Case law

Ferroggiaro v. Board of Public Works

52 Cal. App. 393 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1921

Plaintiff instituted this proceeding against the board of public works of the city and county of Sari Francisco, and the members thereof, and the city and county of San Francisco, a municipal corporation, to restrain them … In support of the proposition reliance is had upon such cases as Davidow v. Griswold, 23 Cal. App. 188, 192 , [ 137 Pac. 619 ]; San Leandro v. Le Breton, 72 Cal. 170, 175 , [ 13 Pac. 405 ]; Berton v.

Betsworth v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

26 Cal. App. 4th 586 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 1994

In its informal reply, the Board acknowledges that a petition for reconsideration is not a prerequisite to our review. (Rowen v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 633, 637 [ 174 Cal.Rptr. 185 ]; Marcus v. … In any event, this court is not bound by the Board’s decisions on questions of law. (E.g., Western Electric Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 629, 644 [ 160 Cal.Rptr. 436 ]; City of Los Angeles v.

Stokes v. Board of Permit Appeals

52 Cal. App. 4th 1348 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 24, 1997

(Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1996) 12 Cal.4th 533, 540, fn. 1 [ 48 Cal.Rptr.2d 778 , 907 P.2d 1324 ], (Hansen); Halaco Engineering Co. v. … (Sunset Amusement Co. v. Board of Police Commissioners (1972) 7 Cal.3d 64, 71-72 [ 101 Cal.Rptr. 768 , 496 P.2d 840 ].)

Chrysler Corp. v. New Motor Vehicle Board

12 Cal. App. 4th 621 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 15, 1993

The court cited City of Coronado v. … Owners’ Assn. v.

Worthington v. State Board of Control

266 Cal. App. 2d 697 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 22, 1968

(Crow v. P.E.G. Constr. Co., Inc. (1957) 156 Cal.App.2d 271, 277 [ 319 P.2d 47 ]; Newman v. Albert (1959) 170 Cal.App.2d 678, 683 [ 339 P.2d 588 ]; 42 Cal.Jur.2d, Release, § 10, p. 702.) … of Control. 1 Neither the statutes nor the Board of Control rules (title 2, Cal.

Allstate Insurance v. State Board of Equalization

169 Cal. App. 2d 165 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 1959

Exch. v. State Board of Equalization, 26 Cal.2d 772 [ 161 P.2d 222 ], provided that of “savings” credited to the insured, the management of the company should receive a commission. … Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 47 gal.2d 384 [ 303 P.2d 1034 ].) The facts in Duel v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins.

Jackson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

35 Cal. Rptr. 3d 256 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 2005

board’s decisions.” … (Johnson v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 163 Cal.App.3d at p. 776 .) Thus, in Geoghegan v.

Board of Supervisors v. Phillips

212 Cal. App. 2d 815 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 8, 1963

(Sehorn v. Williams, 110 Cal. 621, 623 [ 43 P. 8 ]. … When a claim is clearly chargeable against the county, and within the jurisdiction of the board to allow or reject, its decision is final, and the auditor has no discretion to disregard it. (Walton v.

Albertson's, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

131 Cal. App. 3d 308 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 29, 1982

(Deziel v. Difco, supra, 268 N.W.2d at p. 18 .) The limitation by the board finds support in a feature of California’s workers’ compensation law. … The board’s reservation comports with the still persisting California requirement that “‘the employment itself must be a positive factor influencing the course of disease.’ [Citation.]” (Bingham *317 v. Workmen’s Comp.

Bareilles v. State Water Resource Control Board

California Court of Appeal · Dec 16, 2025

(Le Strange v. City of Berkeley (1962) 210 Cal.App.2d 313, 323; see also Alborzi v. … Bareilles v. State Water Resources Control Board et al.

Hernandez v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF STOCKTON

25 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 2, 2004

A Court Control over Desegregation May Be Phased Out In 1954, the United States Supreme Court, in Brown v. … (Brown v. Board of Ed. of Topeka (1955) 349 U.S. 294, 301 [ 99 L.Ed. 1083, 1106 , 75 S.Ct. 753 ].) *1172 In 1968, in Green v.

Jensen v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

136 Cal. App. 3d 1042 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 26, 1982

Fund v. Industrial Acc. Com. 1961) 56 Cal.2d 681, 684 [16 Cal.Rprt. 359, 365 P.2d 415 ]; Gay v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1979) 96 Cal.App.3d 555 [ 158 Cal.Rptr. 137 ]; Franklin v. Workers’ Comp. … (See Zenith Insurance Co. v. Workers’ Comp.

Jordt v. California State Board of Education

35 Cal. App. 2d 591 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 24, 1939

. — Respondent, an osteopathic physician and surgeon duly licensed by the Board of Osteopathic Examiners on August 27, 1930, filed his petition for a writ of mandate against appellant Board, directing said Board to issue … It is admitted by appellant Board that if petitioner possessed a license from the State Board of Medical Examiners they would issue the said credentials to him.

Knight v. Board of Administration

148 Cal. App. 3d 973 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 14, 1983

In Lee v. … (Lee v. Board of Administration, supra, 130 Cal.App.3d at p. 129 , italics in original.)

Webster v. State Board of Control

197 Cal. App. 3d 29 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 18, 1987

We must determine if the Board’s determinations are supported by substantial evidence in light of the whole record. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5, subd. (c); Blazevich v. … (Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 647 [ 335 P.2d 672 ]; Bodinson Mfg. Co. v. California E. Com. (1941) 17 Cal.2d 321, 325 [ 109 P.2d 935 ]; Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Workers' Comp.

Sorey v. Board of Supervisors

11 Cal. App. 2d 315 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 20, 1936

V, sec. 19), and this authority has been exercised by the ordinance previously mentioned. … In the case of Bank of Italy v.

Bundsen v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

147 Cal. App. 3d 106 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 20, 1983

Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (Egan) (1966) 65 Cal.2d 429, 433 [ 55 Cal.Rptr. 248 , 421 P.2d 96 ].) … Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (Coakley), supra, 68 Cal.2d at p. 13 .)

Flanzer v. Board of Dental Examiners

220 Cal. App. 3d 1392 · California Court of Appeal · May 30, 1990

(Crandell v. Fox (1978) 86 Cal.App.3d 760, 763-764 [ 150 Cal.Rptr. 426 ]; Housman v. Board of Medical Examiners (1948) 84 Cal.App.2d 308, 312 [ 190 P.2d 653 ].) … (c); Bixby v. Pierno (1971) 4 Cal.3d 130, 146 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 234 , 481 P.2d 242 ]; Housman v.

Mayer v. Board of Police Commissioners

136 Cal. App. 534 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1934

writ of numdamus, directing that the respondent be restored to duty upon the police department of the city of Los Angeles and that he be paid accrued salary from the date of his alleged attempted suspension therefrom, the board … (Shannon v. City of Los Angeles, 205 Cal. 366 [ 270 Pac. 682 ]; Curtin v. Board of Police Commrs., 74 Cal. App. 77 [ 239 Pac. 355 ], and cases cited therein.) Appellants’ second contention: The petition shows laches.

Young v. State Water Resources Control Board

219 Cal. App. 4th 397 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 4, 2013

In Temescal Water Co. v. … In Meridian, Ltd. v.