Case law

Risley v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners

60 Cal. App. 2d 32 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 1943

This case may be said to be a sequel to Wallis v. Board of Civil Service Commrs., (1938) 11 Cal.2d 430 [ 80 P.2d 972 , 81 P.2d 428 ] (and see also Austin v. … Wheeler, (1935) 10 Cal.App.2d 108, 115 [ 51 P.2d 436 ]; Jordan v. Retirement Board, (1939) 35 Cal.App.2d 653, 656, 657 [ 96 P.2d 973, 976 ]; Sweesy v. Los *41 Angeles etc.

Brant v. Retirement Board of San Francisco

57 Cal. App. 2d 721 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 22, 1943

Retirement Board of S. F., 43 Cal.App.2d 254 [ 110 P.2d 714 ] ; Walker v. City of San Gabriel, 20 Cal.2d 879 [ 129 P.2d 349 ].) … As was said in Reese v.

Wilkinson v. Board of Supervisors

57 Cal. App. 2d 345 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 26, 1943

Petitioner urges that the Social Welfare Board acted in excess of its powers in granting the rehearing. This seems a point of considerable force (see Olive Proration etc. Com. v. … (California Highway Com. v. Riley, 192 Cal. 97, 112 [ 218 P. 579 ]; Walton v. McPhetridge, 120 Cal. 440 [ 52 P. 731 ].)

Bruce v. Civil Service Board

6 Cal. App. 2d 761 · California Court of Appeal · May 7, 1935

Appeal from the Superior Court of the County of Alameda enjoining examination by Civil Service Board.

Duong v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

169 Cal. App. 3d 980 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 1, 1985

(Accord, Parfait v. Deroche (La.App. 1977) 356 So.2d 1051, 1053 .) The same result is reached in Hansen v. … The petition of respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board for review by the Supreme Court was denied September 11, 1985. 1 Contrast Jose Astorga v. Campbell Industries, et al., 83 S.D. 79443 , with Aguayo v.

Arenstein v. California State Board of Pharmacy

265 Cal. App. 2d 179 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 26, 1968

(Kramer v. State Board of Accountancy, 200 Cal.App.2d 163, 177 [19 Cal.Rptr.226].) … Following Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners, 32 Cal.2d 301, 308 [ 196 P.2d 20 ], and Yakov v.

Andersen v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

149 Cal. App. 4th 1369 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 19, 2007

(Patton v. Governing Board (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d 495 [ 143 Cal.Rptr. 593 ] [no payment to local government employee for accumulated sick leave prior to commencement of disability retirement]; accord, Campbell v. … Marsille v.

Toczauer v. State Board of Registration

20 Cal. App. 3d 1067 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 1971

Appellant’s principal contentions 1 are that the trial court erred in not applying its independent judgment and that, in any event, the findings of the board are not supported by substantial evidence. Under Bixby v. … The trial court therefore properly limited its review of the board’s action to the question whether the findings of the board were supported by substantial evidence. (Bixby v. Pierno, supra, p. 146 .)

Newton v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

17 Cal. App. 4th 147 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 14, 1993

On June 8, 1992, the WCJ submitted his report on reconsideration to the Board, recommending that the Board deny employer’s petition, citing Trevino and an unpublished appellate decision from the Sixth District, Jones v. … Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 9 Cal.3d 848, 852 .) Technically deficient pleadings, if they give notice and are timely, normally do not deprive the Board of jurisdiction to hear a matter. (See Bland v.

Jones v. California Horse Racing Board

185 Cal. App. 3d 984 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 23, 1986

Section 19573 entitles an excluded patron to an administrative hearing before the Board. (See Morton v. Hollywood Park, Inc. (1977) 73 Cal.App.3d 248, 254 [ 139 Cal.Rptr. 584 ].) … Aroney v. California Horse Racing Bd. (1983) 145 Cal.App.3d 928 [ 193 Cal.Rptr. 708 ] considered a racetrack patron’s mandamus challenge of the Board’s decision upholding his exclusion from the track.

Masters v. Board of Dental Examiners

15 Cal. App. 2d 506 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 16, 1936

Co. v. Carpenter, 10 Cal. App. (2d) 592 [ 52 Pac. (2d) 992 ].) … (Thrasher v. Board of Medical Examiners, 44 Cal. App. 26 [185 Pac. 1006]; Englebretson v. Industrial Acc. Com., 170 Cal. 793 [ 151 Pac. 421 ].) As to count three the judgment is affirmed.

Poppa v. Board of Administration

146 Cal. App. 3d 848 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 1, 1983

The Board of Administration (Board) of the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) appeals from a judgment of the trial *850 court granting Mrs. … Therefore, his survivor was not entitled to the special death benefit. *852 As the Supreme Court said in California Teachers Assn. v.

Grzeskowiak v. Board of Trustees

62 Cal. App. 3d 131 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 20, 1976

Opinion BROWN (G. A.), P. J. … (Rutherford v. Board of Trustees (1974) 37 Cal.App.3d 775, 779-781 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 560 ]; Stewart v. San Mateo Junior College Dist., supra, 37 Cal.App.3d at pp. 347-348.)

Mountain Defense League v. Board of Supervisors

65 Cal. App. 3d 723 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 6, 1977

Opinion BROWN (Gerald), P. J. The Mountain Defense League, an unincorporated association, and Byron F. … Board of Supervisors, 38 Cal.App.3d 497, 518, fn. 18 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 539 ]); or a special use permit (Jones v.

Stokes v. Board of Permit Appeals

52 Cal. App. 4th 1348 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 24, 1997

(Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors (1996) 12 Cal.4th 533, 540, fn. 1 [ 48 Cal.Rptr.2d 778 , 907 P.2d 1324 ], (Hansen); Halaco Engineering Co. v. … (Sunset Amusement Co. v. Board of Police Commissioners (1972) 7 Cal.3d 64, 71-72 [ 101 Cal.Rptr. 768 , 496 P.2d 840 ].)

Jackson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

35 Cal. Rptr. 3d 256 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 2005

board’s decisions.” … (Johnson v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 163 Cal.App.3d at p. 776 .) Thus, in Geoghegan v.

Mayer v. Board of Police Commissioners

136 Cal. App. 534 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1934

writ of numdamus, directing that the respondent be restored to duty upon the police department of the city of Los Angeles and that he be paid accrued salary from the date of his alleged attempted suspension therefrom, the board … (Shannon v. City of Los Angeles, 205 Cal. 366 [ 270 Pac. 682 ]; Curtin v. Board of Police Commrs., 74 Cal. App. 77 [ 239 Pac. 355 ], and cases cited therein.) Appellants’ second contention: The petition shows laches.

Cooper v. State Board of Public Health

102 Cal. App. 2d 926 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 1951

Board of Medical Examiners, 94 Cal.App.2d 751, 757 [ 211 P.2d 389 ]; Moore v. State Board of Equalization, 76 Cal.App. 2d 758, 763-765 [ 174 P.2d 323 ].) … (Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners, 32 Cal.2d 301, 308 [ 196 P.2d 20 ]; Cooper v. State Bd. of Medical Examiners, 35 Cal.2d 242, 246 [ 217 P.2d 630 ]; Southern Cal. Jockey Club, Inc. v. California etc.

Sandoval v. State Personnel Board

225 Cal. App. 3d 1489 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 4, 1990

W. v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance, supra, 169 Cal.App.3d at p. 230 .) … W. v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance, supra, 169 Cal.App.3d at p. 232 .)

Laird v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

147 Cal. App. 3d 198 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 21, 1983

In McCullough v. … The appeals board may relax its rules and conclude part III of this opinion constitutes good cause sufficient to entitle petitioner to have his case reopened should he petition to do so. (See § 5803 and LeBoeuf v.