Case law

Glendale Board of Realtors v. Hounsell

72 Cal. App. 3d 210 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 29, 1977

This case presents the question whether the Glendale Board of Realtors (hereafter usually the Board) has violated the Cartwright Act (Bus. & Prof. … Code, §§ 16720, 16726) by generally denying to nonmembers of the Board access to its multiple listing service. 1 We hold that it has on the authority of Marin County Bd. *212 of Realtors, Inc. v.

McMurtry v. State Board of Medical Examiners

180 Cal. App. 2d 760 · California Court of Appeal · May 9, 1960

(Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners, 32 Cal.2d 301, 308 [ 196 P.2d 20 ]; cf. Tringham v. State Board of Education, 50 Cal.2d 507 [ 326 P.2d 850 ]; Backman v. State, 167 Cal.App.2d 82, 87 [ 333 P.2d 830 ]; Sautter v. … (Cooper v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 35 Cal.2d 242, 252 [ 217 P.2d 630 , 18 A.L.R.2d 593 ]; Garfield v. State Board of Medical Examiners, 99 Cal.App.2d 219, 231 [ 221 P.2d 705 ].)

Kaczorowski v. Mendocino County Board of Supervisors

106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 14 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 17, 2001

Bk. v. Superior Court (1942) 19 Cal.2d 409, 415 [ 121 P.2d 729 ]; Lushing v. … If the court had entered a judgment against the Board, that judgment would not bind the Commission and would be vulnerable to collateral attack by the Commission. (Silver v.

Clawson v. Board of Registered Nursing

California Court of Appeal · Dec 17, 2021

(E.g., Shea v. … Third, he makes no reasoned argument that the Board’s finding is not supported by substantial evidence. (Okorie v.

Mesmer v. Board of Public Service Commissioners

23 Cal. App. 578 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 26, 1913

Gunn and People v. … A. 755, 28 Pac. 272, 675 ]; Robertson v. Board of Library Trustees, 136 Cal. 403 , [ 69 Pac. 88 ].)

Hartsuiker v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

12 Cal. App. 4th 209 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 11, 1993

In Nickelsberg v. Workers’ Comp. … [Citations.]’]; Mudd v.

Sassone v. Board of Chiropractic Examiners

201 Cal. App. 2d 165 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 12, 1962

The board adopted the proposed decision as its decision. As above stated, the licensee sought a writ of mandate, requiring the board to vacate the order suspending his license. … In Cozad v.

Young v. Board of Medical Examiners

93 Cal. App. 73 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 3, 1928

(Earle v. Commonwealth, 180 Mass. 579 [ 91 Am. St. Rep. 326 , 57 L. R. A. 292, 63 N. E. 10 ]; Semple v. Schwarz, 130 Mo. App. 65 [ 109 S. W. 633 ].) … It is so held in Minaker v. Adams, 55 Cal. App. 374 [ 203 Pac. 806 ], and cases there cited. The judgment is affirmed. Conrey, P. J., concurred.

Duke v. Worker' Compensation Appeals Board

204 Cal. App. 3d 455 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 7, 1988

record. (§ 5952; Nielsen v. … The WCJ’s finding of compensable injury was supported by solid, credible evidence; the Board properly accorded his finding the great weight to which it was entitled. (Lamb v. Workmen’s Comp.

Bergenstal v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

45 Cal. App. 4th 1272 · California Court of Appeal · May 29, 1996

Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com. (1961) 188 Cal.App.2d 656, 659 [ 10 Cal.Rptr. 566 ].) … (Id., at p. 250.) 6 In a recent federal case (Gomez v.

MacK v. State Board of Education

224 Cal. App. 2d 370 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 28, 1964

There was thus included in the evidence considered by the hearing officer, the board, and the superior court that which was added by judicial notice. In Communist Party v. … (Board of Education v. Mass (1956) 47 Cal.2d 494, 498 [ 304 P.2d 1015 ].)

Gruschka v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

169 Cal. App. 3d 789 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 26, 1985

(Bilyeu v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd. (1982) 130 Cal.App.3d 657, 667 [ 181 Cal.Rptr. 837 ].) … (Amador v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd. (1984) 35 Cal.3d 671, 679, 685 [ 200 Cal.Rptr. 298 , 677 P.2d 224 ].)

Veterans' Welfare Board v. City of Oakland

74 Cal. App. 2d 818 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 7, 1946

the board since May 5,1937, a piece of described real property located in Oakland. … Plaintiffs place considerable reliance on the case of Bacich v. Board of Control, 23 Cal.2d 343 [ 144 P.2d 818 ].

Chaidez v. Board of Administration etc.

California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 2014

Chaidez and the City suggest this case is comparable to the circumstances in Crumpler v. Board of Administration (1973) 32 Cal.App.3d 567. … (City of Pleasanton v. Board of Administration, supra, 211 Cal.App.4th at p. 544.)

Clementine v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners

47 Cal. App. 2d 112 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 2, 1941

(Board of Education v. Common Council, 1 Cal. App. 311, 312 [ 82 Pac. 89 ]; Green v. Jordan, 216 Cal. 318, 319 [ 14 Pac. (2d) 297 ] ; Jones v. Clark, 355 Ill. 527 [ 189 N. E. 870, 872 ] ; State ex rel. Shelton v. … Cook v.

Sidders v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

205 Cal. App. 3d 613 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 30, 1988

Since there is no evidence to support this “observation]” of the board, a decision based on said observation must be annulled. (City of Santa Ana v. Workers’ Comp. … We, therefore, annul the board’s decision on this basis as well. (See City of Santa Ana v. Workers’ Comp.

Board of Pension Commissioners v. Hurlburt

7 Cal. App. 2d 568 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 13, 1935

The effect and interpretation of sections 94 and 95 of the Land Title Act were considered in the case of Rutledge v. … Section 94 can only be given the effect to which it is entitled when read in connection with the rest of the act, which leads inevitably to the conclusion that its provisions are directory only (Rutledge v.

Willamette Industries v. Franchise Tax Board

91 Cal. App. 3d 528 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 3, 1979

. *530 Plaintiff Willamette Industries appeals from a judgment of the Sacramento County Superior Court entered after the court granted defendant Franchise Tax Board’s motion for summary judgment.

Wholesalers Board of Adjusters v. Norton

13 Cal. App. 2d 663 · California Court of Appeal · May 6, 1936

(Leonard v. Home Builders, 174 Cal. 65 [ 161 Pac. 1151 , L. R. A. 1917C, 322]; Browning v. McNear, 145 Cal. 272 [ 78 Pac. 722 ]; Tracy Brick etc. Co. v. Wurster, 44 Cal. App. 652 [ 187 Pac. 125 ].) … (Nevada Land & Investment Corp. v. Sistrunk, 220 Cal. 174 [ 30 Pac. (2d) 389 ]; First Nat. Bank v. Stansbury, 118 Cal. App. 80 [ 5 Pac. (2d) 13 ].)

Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

186 Cal. App. 3d 1451 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 10, 1986

WCAB 37 CCC 674 (1972) (writ denied); Hancock v. WCAB 37 CCC 518 (1972) (writ denied, Hearing denied); Belt v. WCAB 36 CCC 466 (1971) (writ denied); Manning v. … In Gallamore v. Workers’ Comp.