Case law

Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

228 Cal. App. 2d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 17, 1964

He appealed to the appeals board and the board reversed the department’s decision. … (Blatz Brewing Co. v. Collins, 69 Cal.App.2d 639 [ 160 P.2d 37 ].) In American Distilling Co. v.

Phillips v. Board of Police Commissioners

240 Cal. App. 2d 410 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 1966

Daniel v. … (Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los Angeles, 57 Cal.2d 515, 522 [ 20 Cal.Rptr. 638 , *416 370 P.2d 342 ]; Doyle v. Board of Barber Examiners, 219 Cal.App.2d 504, 513 [ 33 Cal.Rptr. 349 ].)

Cox v. Board of Retirement

27 Cal. App. 3d 135 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 10, 1972

Phillipson v. … This court in Lesem v. Board of Retirement, 183 Cal.App.2d 289 [ 6 Cal.Rptr. 608 ], held that under the special circumstances of that case the retired employee might change his election.

Kobelin v. Board of Retirement

8 Cal. App. 3d 1057 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 23, 1970

The retirement board cites Allan v. Board of Administration (1942) 55 Cal.App.2d 815 [ 131 P.2d 604 ], as support for its position. … (See Dribin v. Superior Court (1951) 37 Cal.2d 345, 351 [ 231 P.2d 809 , 24 A.L.R.2d 864 ].) The judgment is affirmed. Kingsley, Acting P. J., and Dunn, J., concurred.

Morton v. Board of Registered Nursing

235 Cal. App. 3d 1560 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 1991

rather than quasi judicial action” (DiGenova v. … The board’s discretion under Business and Professions Code section 2759 is virtually unfettered and clearly authorized the action it took. (See Bryce v.

Rubino v. Board of Trustees

191 Cal. App. 2d 366 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1961

In Hagginwood Sanitary District v. … (Brown v. Aguilar, 202 Cal. 143 [ 259 P. 735 ].)” We do not believe that the decisions relied upon by appellants are determinative of the instant appeal.

Erickson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

12 Cal. App. 3d 388 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 27, 1970

Factual determinations of the board must be upheld if, upon examination of the entire record, there is substantial evidence in their support. (LeVesque v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … The board, however, “ ‘must accept as true the intended meaning of [evidence] both uncontradicted and unimpeached.’ ” (LeVesque v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra, at p. 639.)

Williams v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

88 Cal. Rptr. 2d 798 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 18, 1999

(DuBois v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1993) 5 Cal.4th 382, 387-388 [ 20 Cal.Rptr.2d 523 , 853 P.2d 978 ].) … (Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1985) 165 Cal.App.3d 633, 638 [ 211 Cal.Rptr. 683 ].) Of note is Applebee’s Restaurant v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1998) 63 Cal.Comp.Cases 840 (writ den.).

Dickey v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

224 Cal. App. 3d 1460 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 5, 1990

We hold the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (the Board) erred in awarding temporary disability indemnity at less than the statutory maximum rate for the portion of the temporary disability attributable to applicant’s … The Board’s decision in this regard is inconsistent with the express language of Labor Code section 4458 and the purposes of that section as explained in Meredith v. Workers’ Comp.

Huston v. State Personnel Board

13 Cal. App. 2d 707 · California Court of Appeal · May 8, 1936

These appointments were made by the State Board of Equalization, which board also fixed the class and grade of position, duties to be performed and salaries to be paid, and had to do with the administration or enforcement … We believe this contention, as well as all other questions raised by petitioners, has been determined adversely to them in the case of Kennedy v.

McIver v. Board of Directors

7 Cal. App. 2d 754 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 6, 1935

This is an application for a writ of mandate compelling the respondents, as the Board of Directors of the Imperial Irrigation District, to meet and count all of the votes cast at an election held in said district on February … With the exception of the names of the candidates and the office in question, the material facts herein are identical with those in the case of Barry v.

Rodgers v. State Personnel Board

California Court of Appeal · Sep 9, 2022

(Brown v. … (See Brown, supra, 166 Cal.App.3d at p. 1164, fn. 4 [noting that section 19575.5 authorizes “amendment of the charging document only prior to the submission of the appeal for decision by the board”].)

Kearl v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance

189 Cal. App. 3d 1040 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 5, 1986

(Cooper v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 49 Cal.App.3d at p. 941 .) B. … (Rivard v. Board of Pension Commissioners, supra, 164 Cal.App.3d at pp. 412-413.)

Weisman v. Board of Building & Safety Commissioners

85 Cal. App. 493 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 19, 1927

The respondents herein petitioned the superior court for an order to compel the Board of Building and Safety Commissioners of the City of Los Angeles and the chief inspector of that board to issue a permit to erect a building … It was decided to *495 the contrary in the early case of Pimental v. San Francisco, 21 Cal. 351 . The same rule has been recognized in subsequent cases, among them City of San Luis Obispo v.

Sandoval v. State Personnel Board

225 Cal. App. 3d 1489 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 4, 1990

W. v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance, supra, 169 Cal.App.3d at p. 230 .) … W. v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance, supra, 169 Cal.App.3d at p. 232 .)

Jones v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

267 Cal. App. 2d 302 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 8, 1968

However, such findings are contrary to those made by the board in the earlier proceedings, which findings are res judicata (Dow Chemical Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … (Tanenbaum v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1935) 4 Cal.2d 615, 617 [ 52 P.2d 215 ].) The board relies, too, on the following statement in State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Industrial Acc.

Rinaldo v. Board of Medical Examiners

5 Cal. App. 2d 345 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 19, 1935

(Winning v. Board of Dental Examiners, 114 Cal. App. 658 [ 300 Pac. 866 ].) It cannot be said herein that there was no competent evidence upon which to base the judgment of the board. … (Farmers’ & Merchants’ Bank v. Board of Equalization, 97 Cal. 318 [ 32 Pac. 312 ].)

Robertson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

112 Cal. App. 4th 893 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 21, 2003

We annul the decision and order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) that found the offer of the alternative position satisfied Company’s VR obligation. We remand the matter to the WCAB. … In the appeal, the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ), relying on Anzelde v. Workers’ Comp.

Johnson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

76 Cal. Rptr. 2d 422 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 1998

[Citation.]’ ” (Mote v. Workers’ Comp. … (Pereira v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1987) 196 Cal.App.3d 1, 6 [ 241 Cal.Rptr. 302 ]; accord, Webb v. Workers’ Comp.

Ostrager v. State Board of Control

99 Cal. App. 3d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 29, 1979

He filed an application for assistance with the respondent board which administers California’s victims of crime statute. … (McDonald v. Board of Election (1969) 394 U.S. 802, 809 [ 22 L.Ed.2d 739, 745-746 , 89 S.Ct. 1404 ]; McGowan v. Maryland (1961) 366 U.S. 420, 425-426 [ 6 L.Ed.2d 393, 398-399 , 81 S.Ct. 1101 ].)” (Adams v.