Case law

Heaton v. Marin County Employees Retirement Board

63 Cal. App. 3d 421 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 8, 1976

Moreover, the court in Minor v. … Board of Retirement (1969) 273 Cal.App.2d 124 [ 77 Cal.Rptr. 891 ]; Flaherty v.

Phillips v. Board of Police Commissioners

240 Cal. App. 2d 410 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 1966

Daniel v. … (Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los Angeles, 57 Cal.2d 515, 522 [ 20 Cal.Rptr. 638 , *416 370 P.2d 342 ]; Doyle v. Board of Barber Examiners, 219 Cal.App.2d 504, 513 [ 33 Cal.Rptr. 349 ].)

Breaux v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

217 Cal. App. 3d 730 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 29, 1990

(Cf. *752 Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, supra, 431 U.S. 209, 237 [ 52 L.Ed.2d at p. 285 ].) … Labor Board v.

Leffler v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

124 Cal. App. 3d 739 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 19, 1981

Hodges v. WCAB (1978) 82 Cal.App.3d 894 , 43 C.C.C. 810; Beaty v. WCAB (1978) 80 Cal.App.3d 397 , 43 C.C.C. 444.” The. WCAB, in a two-to-one decision, affirmed this ruling. … Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

Meyer v. State Land Settlement Board

99 Cal. App. 337 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 7, 1929

A board of managers was created, and large appropriations of money were made from time to time to carry out the purposes of the act. (Stats. 1917, p. 1566, 2 Deering’s Gen. Laws 1923, Act 8008.) … It is well said in Carmichael v. Riley, 56 Cal.

Copren v. State Board of Equalization

200 Cal. App. 3d 828 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 26, 1988

The assessor then brought this declaratory relief action against the State Board of Equalization (Board). … People v. Barry (1987) 194 Cal.App.3d 158 , 174 [ 239 Cal.Rptr. 349 ].)

Adams v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

22 Cal. App. 3d 214 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 1971

The decision of the board cannot be based on inferences which are at best speculative and conjectural. (Garza v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd., 3 Cal.3d 312 [ 90 Cal.Rptr. 355 , 475 P.2d 451 ]; Rushing v. Workmen's Comp. … .) *219 The decision of the appeals board is annulled, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed herein. Stone, P. J., and Brown (G. A.), J., concurred.

Zarate v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

99 Cal. App. 3d 598 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 11, 1979

The WCAB lead opinion also noted that in Adams v. Workers’ Comp. … The dissent also pointed out that in Turudich v. Industrial Acc.

Bussear v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

181 Cal. App. 3d 186 · California Court of Appeal · May 20, 1986

The order of the Board is annulled, and the matter is remanded to the Board for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed in this opinion. … (Bekins Moving & Storage Co. v. Workers’ Comp.

Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board

228 Cal. App. 2d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 17, 1964

He appealed to the appeals board and the board reversed the department’s decision. … (Blatz Brewing Co. v. Collins, 69 Cal.App.2d 639 [ 160 P.2d 37 ].) In American Distilling Co. v.

Rodgers v. State Personnel Board

California Court of Appeal · Sep 9, 2022

(Brown v. … (See Brown, supra, 166 Cal.App.3d at p. 1164, fn. 4 [noting that section 19575.5 authorizes “amendment of the charging document only prior to the submission of the appeal for decision by the board”].)

Kingston v. Board of Supervisors

230 Cal. App. 2d 455 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 4, 1964

(See Griffin v. Board of Supervisors, 60 Cal.2d 318, 320 [ 33 Cal. … (See Reynolds v. Sims, supra, 377 U.S. at pp. 579-581 [84 S.Ct. at pp. 1390-1392, 12 L.Ed.2d at pp. 537-539] ; Griffin v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 60 Cal.2d at pp. 754-755.)

Masoni v. Board of Trade of SF

119 Cal. App. 2d 738 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 17, 1953

(Speegle v. Board of Fire Underwriters, 29 Cal.2d 34, 39 [ 172 P.2d 867 ].) … (Compare Speegle v. Board of Fire Underwriters, supra, 29 Cal.2d at page 40 .)

Petersen v. Social Welfare Board

190 Cal. App. 2d 652 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 29, 1961

Petitioners were among the successful parties in the case of Bertch v. Social Welfare Dept., 45 Cal.2d 524 [ 289 P.2d 485 ]. … Petitioners’ appeals to the respondent Social Welfare Board were denied and they thereupon sought review in the superior court. That court sustained the action of the board and their appeals to this court followed.

Nielsen v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

164 Cal. App. 3d 918 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 20, 1985

That is a question of fact to be determined by the Board. (Chambers v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1968) 69 Cal.2d 556, 559 [ 72 Cal.Rptr. 651 , 446 P.2d 531 ]; Pacific Indem. Co. v. Industrial Acc. … Next, relying on a writ denied decision of a three-member panel of the Board in International Paper Co. v. Workers’ Comp.

Kearl v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance

189 Cal. App. 3d 1040 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 5, 1986

(Cooper v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 49 Cal.App.3d at p. 941 .) B. … (Rivard v. Board of Pension Commissioners, supra, 164 Cal.App.3d at pp. 412-413.)

Morton v. Board of Registered Nursing

235 Cal. App. 3d 1560 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 1991

rather than quasi judicial action” (DiGenova v. … The board’s discretion under Business and Professions Code section 2759 is virtually unfettered and clearly authorized the action it took. (See Bryce v.

Risley v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners

60 Cal. App. 2d 32 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 1943

This case may be said to be a sequel to Wallis v. Board of Civil Service Commrs., (1938) 11 Cal.2d 430 [ 80 P.2d 972 , 81 P.2d 428 ] (and see also Austin v. … Wheeler, (1935) 10 Cal.App.2d 108, 115 [ 51 P.2d 436 ]; Jordan v. Retirement Board, (1939) 35 Cal.App.2d 653, 656, 657 [ 96 P.2d 973, 976 ]; Sweesy v. Los *41 Angeles etc.

Silberberg v. Franchise Tax Board

107 Cal. App. 2d 826 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 4, 1951

The legal question presented for decision in this case is the same as stated in Francis v. McColgan, this day decided by this court, No. 18504, ante, p. 823 [ 238 P.2d 70 ].

McBride v. California Board of Accountancy

130 Cal. App. 4th 518 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 21, 2005

The Imposition of Prehearing Costs Does Not Violate Due Process and Does Not Invalidate the Board’s Decision Citing Turney v. Ohio (1927) 273 U.S. 510 [ 71 L.Ed. 749 , 47 S.Ct. 437 ] and Ward v. … That the ALJ’s decision is not reviewable by the Board distinguishes this case from AEP Chapter Housing Ass’n v.