Case law

Cavanaugh v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

255 Cal. App. 2d 181 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 18, 1967

BROWN (Gerald), P. J. The Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board filed an order March 9, 1967, in its Santa Ana office, denying.George Cavanaugh’s petition for-eommu *178 tation. … The board determined he. filed it too late. The board is correct if Labor Code, section 5903’s 20 days are measured from March 9,1967. Petitioner relies upon Taylor v. Industrial Acc.

Donovan v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

138 Cal. App. 3d 323 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 1982

The board apparently seized on portions thereof to reach their result. We need not analyze the sufficiency of such evidence for the board erroneously placed the burden of proof upon the wrong party. (Burnight v. … {Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1982) 31 Cal.3d 715 [ 182 Cal.Rptr. 778 , 644 P.2d 1257 ].)

Thornton v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

204 Cal. App. 4th 1403 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 17, 2012

Near the end of Thornton’s term as chairperson of the Board, the Board’s executive director offered her a job as an ALJ for the Board. … Brody v.

Vienna v. California Horse Racing Board

133 Cal. App. 3d 387 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 1, 1982

(Sandstrom v. Cal. Horse Racing Board, supra, 31 Cal. 2d at p. 409 ; Jones v. Superior Court, supra, 114 Cal. App.3d at p. 730 .) … (See Sandstrom v. Cal. Horse Racing Board, supra, 31 Cal. 2d at p. 412 .)

Young v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

37 Cal. App. 3d 606 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 27, 1974

Discussion In reviewing a decision of the California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board, the superior court exercised its independent judgment on the administrative evidence (Lacy v. California Unemployment Ins. … (See Douglas Aircraft Co. v. California Unemp. Ins. Appeals Board, 180 Cal.App.2d 636, 642 [ 4 Cal.Rptr. 723 ], holding such terminations are not voluntary; see also Cleveland Board of Education v.

Kerin v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

87 Cal. App. 3d 146 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 7, 1978

He also contends it was error to make use of a United States Supreme Court case (Social Security Board v. … The principal case is Social Security Board v. Nierotko, supra 327 U.S. 358 .

Paneno v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

4 Cal. App. 4th 136 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 4, 1992

In Shearer v. … In Southwest Airlines v. Workers’ Comp.

Finot v. Pasadena City Board of Education

250 Cal. App. 2d 189 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 18, 1967

(c); Matthews v. Board of Education, 198 Cal.App.2d 748, 754 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 101 ]; Mitchell v. Board of Trustees, 5 Cal.App.2d 64, 69 [ 42 P.2d 397 ].) … Board of Trustees, 18 Cal.2d 586, 597 [ 116 P.2d 593 ] ; Board of Education v. Swan, 41 Cal.2d 546, 556 [261 P.2d261].)

Fenn v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

107 Cal. App. 4th 1292 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 2003

In his trial brief Fenn relied on City of Sacramento v. … The City relied on Mannetter v.

George v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

179 Cal. App. 4th 1475 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 9, 2009

We have held that “state employees may pursue their claims of employment discrimination with either the Board or the DFEH or both.” (Ruiz v. … In Takahashi v. Board of Education , the prior actions resolved the key issue in the FEHA claim—whether the discharge was for good cause.

Kelley v. State Board of Social Welfare

82 Cal. App. 2d 627 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 26, 1947

(Board of Soc. Welfare v. County of Los *632 Angeles, 27 Cal.2d 81, 86, 89 [ 162 P.2d 630 ].) … C. v. Cleverdon, 16 Cal.2d 788, 791 [ 108 P.2d 405 ].)

Katzin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

5 Cal. App. 4th 703 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 16, 1992

Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1978) 86 Cal.App.3d 1, 3 [ 149 Cal.Rptr. 878 ].) … Code, § 4621; Lamb v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd. (1974) 11 Cal.3d 274, 280-281 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 162 , 520 P.2d 978 ]; Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Acc. Com.

Vandagriff v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

265 Cal. App. 2d 854 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 19, 1968

However, the board made no specific finding the suicide was wilful and deliberate. The board made no finding or statement regarding irresistible impulse. At the time of Burnight v. Industrial Acc. … As stated in Evans v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

Board of Law Library Trustees v. Lowery

67 Cal. App. 2d 480 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 8, 1945

Dist., 92 Cal. 296 [ 28 P. 272, 675 , 29 Am.St.Rep. 106 , 14 L.R.A. 755 ]); municipal utility districts (Morrison v. Smith Bros., Inc., 211 Cal. 36 [ 293 P. 53]); the metropolitan water district (City of Pasadena v. … Chamberlain, 204 Cal. 653 [ 269 P. 630 ]); the toll bridge authority (California Toll Bridge Authority v. Kelly, 218 Cal. 7 [ 21 P.2d 425 ]), and county water districts (Laguna Beach County Water District v.

Rubio v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

165 Cal. App. 3d 196 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 4, 1985

Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (1980) 109 Cal.App.3d 148, 152-153 [ 167 Cal.Rptr. 57 ].) No statute or rule compels the result reached by the Board. … By the language of the rale dismissal is not mandatory but rather discretionary; hence, failure to comply does not deprive the Board of jurisdiction. (Cf., Flamer v.

Shafer v. State Board of Equalization

174 Cal. App. 3d 423 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 1985

Dist. v. … (Haman v. County of Humboldt, supra, 8 Cal.3d at pp. 925-926; Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. County of Alameda, supra, 12 Cal.3d at p. 780 .)

P. ex rel. Alameda County Taxpayers' Assn. v. Brown

California Court of Appeal · Sep 30, 2025

No. 22CV015533) v. DAVID KYLE BROWN, Defendant and Respondent. … Alameda County Taxpayers’ Association, Inc., et al. v. Brown – A168562

Horeczko v. State Board of Registration

232 Cal. App. 3d 1352 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 31, 1991

(Varanelli v. Structural Pest Control Board, supra, 1 Cal.App.3d at p. 222 .) Quoting from a United States Supreme Court case (Williamson v. … (Varanelli v. Structural Pest Control Board, supra, 1 Cal.App.3d at p. 224 ; and see Naismith Dental Corp. v. Board of Dental Examiners (1977) 68 Cal.App.3d 253, 259-263 [ 137 Cal.Rptr. 133 ].)

Fisher v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

62 Cal. App. 3d 924 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 20, 1976

At this point the board believed itself bound by Ruiz v. Industrial Acc. Com., 45 Cal.2d 409 [ 289 P.2d 229 ]. … In this case the appeals board correctly applied section 5406 and the rule of Ruiz v. Industrial Acc. Com. to bar the widow’s claim.

Jones-Hamilton Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

268 Cal. App. 2d 343 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 1968

Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 49 Cal.2d 729, 736 [ 321 P.2d 729 ]; Aguirre v. Southern Pac. Co., 232 Cal.App.2d 636, 642-643 [ 43 Cal.Rptr. 73 ] ; Gibbons & Reed Co. v. … (Dittus v. Cranston, 53 Cal.2d 284, 286 [ 1 Cal.Rptr. 327 , 347 P.2d 671 ] ; Lundberg v. County of Alameda, 46 Cal.2d 644, 652 [ 298 P.2d 1 ]; El Dorado Oil Works v.