Case law

Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court

207 Cal. App. 3d 552 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1989

(Governing Board v. Mann (1977) 18 Cal.3d 819, 828 [ 135 Cal.Rptr. 526 , 558 P.2d 1 ].) c. Application here. Preliminarily, Madera Community Hospital v. … (Governing Board v. Mann, supra, 18 Cal.3d at p. 828 .)

Cano v. State Board of Control

7 Cal. App. 4th 1162 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 1992

of Control (Board). … (People v. Woodhead (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1002 , *1165 1007-1008 [ 239 Cal.Rptr. 656 , 741 P.2d 154 ].)

Rucker v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

82 Cal. App. 4th 151 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 13, 2000

The Board has the power to amend its decision on the basis of the evidence previously submitted, but only after fully apprising the parties of the evidence to be considered. (See Fidelity & Cas. Co. of New York v. … (Kopitske v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1999) 74 Cal.App.4th 623 , 633 [ 88 Cal.Rptr.2d 216 ]; Edgar v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 1, 10-11 [ 76 Cal.Rptr.2d 83 ]; but see Ritchie v. Workers’ Comp.

Light v. State Water Resources Control Board

226 Cal. App. 4th 1463 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 16, 2014

(Dunn-Edwards Corp. v. South Coast Air Quality Management Dist. (1993) 19 Cal.App.4th 536, 545– 546, fn. 5; see Bayside Timber Co. v. Board of Supervisors (1971) 20 Cal.App.3d 1, 11.) … (Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Board of Equalization (2013) 57 Cal.4th 401, 415.)

California Teachers' Ass'n v. Governing Board

169 Cal. App. 3d 35 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 7, 1985

In Abbott v. … Board of Administration (1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 590, 594 [ 163 Cal.Rptr. 182 ]). In Longshore v.

Hodge v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

123 Cal. App. 3d 501 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 4, 1981

(Garcia v. Industrial Acc. … Cole modified the rule in Witt v. Jackson, supra, and Roe v. Workmen’s Comp.

Holt v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

187 Cal. App. 3d 1257 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 1, 1986

Petitioner seeks review of a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (the Board) after denial of his petition for reconsideration of the Board’s decision to adopt the report and recommendation of the workers’ … Upon a review of the entire record, we find the Board’s decision to be amply supported by substantial evidence. (LeVesque v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1970) 1 Cal.3d 627, 637 [ 83 Cal.Rptr. 208 , 463 P.2d 432 ].)

Kidwell v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

33 Cal. App. 4th 1130 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 3, 1995

’s opinion in Ezzy v. … Citing Taylor v. Workers’ Comp.

Lewis v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

56 Cal. App. 3d 938 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 1976

In view of the controversial nature of the medical issue, the board is to be commended and not faulted for obtaining additional evidence on the medical problem before it. (Zozaya v. Workmen’s Comp. … (See e.g., Turner v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd., 42 Cal.App.3d 1036, 1043 [ 117 Cal.Rptr. 358 ]; see also Greenberg v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd., 37 Cal.App.3d 792, 798-799 [ 112 Cal.Rptr. 626 ]; Stephens v.

Abraham v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

6 Cal. Rptr. 3d 820 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 25, 2003

(Id. at pp. 912-913; see also Pizarro v. … Another Supreme Court case, Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v.

Lavin v. California Horse Racing Board

57 Cal. App. 4th 263 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 22, 1997

(Killian v. City *268 and County of San Francisco (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d 1, 7 [ 143 Cal.Rptr. 430 ]; Shoban v. Board of Trustees (1969) 276 Cal.App.2d 534, 541 [ 81 Cal.Rptr. 112 ].) E. … (Sandstrom v. Cal. Horse Racing Board (1948) 31 Cal.2d 401, 407-408 [ 189 P.2d 17 ]; accord, So. Cal. Jockey Club v. Cal. Horse Racing Bd. (1950) 36 Cal.2d 167, 170-171 [ 223 P.2d 1 ].)

Hodgman v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

65 Cal. Rptr. 3d 687 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 12, 2007

Code, *54 § 3209.5; see Henson v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd. (1972) 27 Cal.App.3d 452, 457-462 [ 103 Cal.Rptr. 785 ]; Republic Indemnity Co. of America v. Workers’ Comp. … (Kerley v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1971) 4 Cal.3d 223 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 192 , 481 P.2d 200 ].) The Board denied a penalty because it found the C&R ambiguous. But we have determined that the C&R is not ambiguous.

Gonzales v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

81 Cal. Rptr. 2d 54 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 21, 1999

In assessing these elements, the Board may rely on its general knowledge. (Argonaut Ins. Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., supra, 57 Cal.2d at p. 595 ; West v. Industrial Acc. Com., supra, 79 Cal.App.2d at p. 722 .) … Fund v. Brown (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 188, 199 [ 38 Cal.Rptr.2d 98 ]; Western Electric Co. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 629, 644 [ 160 Cal.Rptr. 436 ].)

Calhoun v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

127 Cal. App. 3d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 22, 1981

Berry v. WCAB (1968), 68 Cal.2d 786 , 33 CCC 352; Zemke v. WCAB (1968), 33 CCC 358. The Board is persuaded that a supplemental report from Dr. … . *7 “The Board believes that additional evidence is required to resolve the issue of apportionment. The Board may not leave undeveloped matters which it identifies as requiring further evidence. Raymond Plastering v.

Conway v. State Water Resources Control Board

235 Cal. App. 4th 671 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 30, 2015

Regional Water Quality Control Boards (Regional Board) regulate the quality of water within their regions under the purview of the State Board. (See City of Arcadia v. … (See Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. (1984) 467 U.S. 837, 844.) Here the EPA approved the Board's TMDL as applied to the lake bed sediment.

Bayside Timber Co. v. Board of Supervisors

20 Cal. App. 3d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 16, 1971

In the case of State Board v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners (1953) 40 Cal.2d 436 [ 254 P.2d 29 ], a Dry Cleaners’ Act of 1945 created a seven-member State Board of Dry Cleaners. … The rationale of State Board v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners, supra, was re *13 cently approved and followed in Blumenthal v. Board of Medical Examiners (1962) 57 Cal.2d 228, 235-236 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 501 , 368 P.2d 101 ].

Barth v. Board of Pension Commissioners

145 Cal. App. 3d 826 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 10, 1983

(Campbell v. Board of Administration (1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 565, 571 [ 163 Cal.Rptr. 198 ]; italics in original; McKeag v. Board of Pension Commrs. (1942) 21 Cal.2d 386, 390 [ 132 P.2d 198 ].) … Board of Pension Commrs. (1941) 18 Cal.2d 427, 431-432 [ 116 P.2d 37 , 136 A.L.R. 800 ], and Dryden v. Board of Pension Commrs. (1936) 6 Cal.2d 575, 578-582 [ 59 P.2d 104 ]. (See also Abbott v.

Scott v. State Board of Equalization

50 Cal. App. 4th 1597 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 22, 1996

Relying on Copren v. … The statute at issue in Copren v.

Garrick v. Board of Pension Commissioners

17 Cal. App. 3d 243 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 28, 1971

If it must, then the board did not proceed in the manner required by law and abused *245 its discretion prejudicially. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5, subd. (b); cf. Siler v. Industrial Acc. … [Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board] and the pension board exist for entirely different reasons and were established to attain wholly independent objectives.” ( 255 Cal.App.2d at p. 414 .)

Yeutter v. California Horse Racing Board

86 Cal. App. 3d 979 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 1978

([Gray v. Whitmore], 17 Cal.App.3d [1] atpp. 21-22 [ 94 Cal.Rptr. 904 ].)” (Purifoy v. State Board of Education, 30 Cal.App.3d 187, 196 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 201 ].) … Jockey Club v. Cal. etc. Racing Bd., 36 Cal.2d 167, 170-171 [ 223 P.2d 1 ], Sandstrom v. Cal. Horse Racing Board, 31 Cal.2d 401, 413 [ 189 P.2d 17 , 3 A.L.R.2d 90 ].)