Case law

Fox v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

4 Cal. App. 4th 1196 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 24, 1992

(Reich, Adell, Crost & Perry v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 225, 236 [ 160 Cal.Rptr. 218 ].) The Board has exclusive jurisdiction over medical liens (§§ 5300, subd. (b), 5304; Bell v. … Carr, M.D., Inc. v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (Maciel) (1987) 52 Cal.Comp.Cases 534, writ denied, the Board also denied the lien of a claimant who had failed twice to appear. Board rule 10562 (Cal.

Gorman v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

133 Cal. App. 3d 998 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 19, 1982

affirm the order of the Board. … Fund v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd. (1972) 26 Cal.App.3d 200, 204 [ 103 Cal.Rptr. 29 ].) The Board properly construed the applicable statutory provisions; its order is affirmed. Morris, P.

Shipley v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

7 Cal. App. 4th 1104 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 1992

In Carreiro v. … Allowing the board to subsequently deny the petition by operation of law under section 5909 makes no sense. Our position is bolstered by State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Workers’ Comp.

Power v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

179 Cal. App. 3d 775 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 2, 1986

(Place v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1970) 3 Cal.3d 372, 378 [ 90 Cal.Rptr. 424 , 475 P.2d 656 ].) Here, the Board expressly relied on Dr. … Applicant relies on Lamb v. Workmen’s Comp.

Cavanaugh v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

255 Cal. App. 2d 181 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 18, 1967

BROWN (Gerald), P. J. The Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board filed an order March 9, 1967, in its Santa Ana office, denying.George Cavanaugh’s petition for-eommu *178 tation. … The board determined he. filed it too late. The board is correct if Labor Code, section 5903’s 20 days are measured from March 9,1967. Petitioner relies upon Taylor v. Industrial Acc.

Russ v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

125 Cal. App. 3d 834 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 19, 1981

(See § 101; see also, e.g., California Human Resources Dept. v. Java (1971) 402 U.S. 121, 125 [ 28 L.Ed.2d 666, 670 , 915 S.Ct. 1347 ]; Gillum v. … (Morse v. Municipal Court (1974) 13 Cal.3d 149, 156 [ 118 Cal.Rptr. 14 , 529 P.2d 46 }; People v. Baker (1968) 69 Cal.2d 44, 50 [ 69 Cal.Rptr. 595 , 442 P.2d 675 ]; People v.

Rodriguez v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

21 Cal. App. 4th 1747 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1994

On the issue of whether applicant needs further medical treatment, the Board, relying on Taylor v. Workers’ Comp. … In Carter v.

Vienna v. California Horse Racing Board

133 Cal. App. 3d 387 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 1, 1982

(Sandstrom v. Cal. Horse Racing Board, supra, 31 Cal. 2d at p. 409 ; Jones v. Superior Court, supra, 114 Cal. App.3d at p. 730 .) … (See Sandstrom v. Cal. Horse Racing Board, supra, 31 Cal. 2d at p. 412 .)

Hamilton v. State Board of Education

117 Cal. App. 3d 132 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 20, 1981

(See People v. Rodgers (1978) 79 Cal.App.3d 26, 30 [ 144 Cal.Rptr. 602 ]; Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247, 256 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 761 , 502 P.2d 1049 ].) … Assn. v.

Soby v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

26 Cal. App. 3d 555 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 29, 1972

Code, § 3202; Laeng v. Workmen’s Comp. … The take nothing award is annulled, and the case is remanded to the board. Brown (H. C.), J., and Caldecott, J., concurred.

Hollingsworth v. Board of Medical Examiners

188 Cal. App. 2d 172 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 11, 1961

As said in Hawker v. … (Hawker v. People of the State of New York, supra.) It is true that appellants introduced before the board much persuasive evidence that they were men of good moral character.

Tellis v. Contractors' State License Board

93 Cal. Rptr. 2d 734 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 17, 2000

Tellis relies on Terminix Co. v. Contractors’ State etc. … Even if they were warranty repairs, under Mickelson Concrete Co. v. Contractors’ State License Bd., supra, 95 Cal.App.3d 631 and Viking Pools, Inc. v.

BOARD OF PRISON TERMS v. Superior Court

31 Cal. Rptr. 3d 70 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 5, 2005

In People v. … In People v.

Sparks v. Board of Dental Examiners

25 Cal. App. 2d 341 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 15, 1938

(Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 6 Cal. (2d) 557 [ 59 Pac. (2d) 119 ] ; Whitten v. California State Board of Optometry, 8 Cal. (2d) 444 *342 [ 65 Pac. (2d) 1296 ] ; Jacobs v. … Board of Dental Examiners, 24 Cal. App. (2d) 359 [ 75 Pac. (2d) 96 ]; MacCracken v. Board of Medical Examiners, 24 Cal. App. (2d) 58 [74 Pac. (2d) 289]; O’Donnell v. Board of Medical Examiners, 22 Cal.

Rich v. State Board of Optometry

242 Cal. App. 2d 598 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 1, 1966

(See also Harris v. Alcoholic Beverage etc. Appeals Board, 61 Cal.2d 305 [ 38 Cal.Rptr. 409 , 392 P.2d 1 ].) … Our references hereafter to the “Board” include these individuals as well. 2 The proceeding before the trial judge constituted a trial de novo. (See Laisne v.

Gellie v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

171 Cal. App. 3d 917 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 30, 1985

Although the board should strive to fairly balance the injured employee’s right to prompt payment with the avoidance of harsh sanctions inflicted upon the employer (Gallamore v. Workers’ Comp. … Franczak v. Liberty Mut. Ins.

Telish v. Cal. State Personnel Board

California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 2015

(Coleman v. Department of Personnel Administration (1991) 52 Cal.3d 1102, 1125.) Any factual finding by the Board “which is not specifically attacked is to be accepted as true.” (Black v. … (Lorimore v. State Personnel Board (1965) 232 Cal.App.2d 183, 189; accord Wilson v. State Personnel Bd. (1976) 58 Cal.App.3d 865, 877; Flowers v. State Personnel Bd. (1985) 174 Cal.App.3d 753, 759; Larson v.

Chambers v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

33 Cal. App. 3d 923 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 13, 1973

Brown, 366 U.S. 599, 603-607 [ 6 L.Ed.2d 563, 566-569 , 81 S.Ct. 1144 ]; Thomas v. Collins, 323 U.S. 516, 530 [ 89 L.Ed. 430, 440 , 65 S.Ct. 315 ]; Valentine v. … (Braun feld v. Brown, supra, 366 U.S. 599 .) A statute making it a crime for an 18-year-old girl'to sell literature in public places was upheld, although it was her religious duty to do so. (Prince v.

Arboleda v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

253 Cal. App. 2d 481 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 11, 1967

Council v. Industrial Acc. Com., supra, 94 Cal.App.2d 65 ; Schreifer v. Industrial Acc. Com., supra, 61 Cal.2d 289 .) In the case of Los Angeles Jewish etc. Council v. Industrial Acc. … Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Board (1967) 66 Cal. 2d 944 [ 59 Cal.Rptr. 622 , 428 P.2d 606 ].)

Cortez v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

38 Cal. Rptr. 3d 922 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 8, 2006

(Swedlow, Inc. v. Workers’ Comp. … The Board reasoned that former section 4062 applied for injuries prior to January 1, 2005, under the reasoning of Godinez v.