Case law

Chu v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

49 Cal. App. 4th 1176 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 1, 1996

See also Beauchamp v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1968) 259 Cal.App.2d 147, 153-154 [ 66 Cal.Rptr. 352 ] (Beauchamp), Donovan v. Workers’ Comp. … (Rulbalcava v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 220 Cal.App.3d at p. 908 .) The Board relied solely on Dr. Reiss’s opinion.

Blanchard v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

53 Cal. App. 3d 590 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 9, 1975

(Beaida v. Workmen's Comp. App. … (Frost v. Witter, 132 Cal. 421, 424-425 [ 64 P. 705 ]; Day v. Western Loan & Bldg. Co., 42 Cal.App.2d 226, 232 [ 108 P.2d 702 ]; accord: Doolittle v. McConnell, 178 Cal. 697, 701-704 [ 174 P. 305 ]; Ruiz v.

Gangwish v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

108 Cal. Rptr. 2d 1 · California Court of Appeal · May 22, 2001

The question of delay and the reasonableness of the cause therefor shall be determined by the appeals board in accordance with the facts.” … (Moulton v. Workers’ Comp.

Gale v. State Board of Equalization

264 Cal. App. 2d 689 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 5, 1968

. * David V. Gale sued the State Board of Equalization for refund of motor vehicle transportation license taxes paid to defendant. After appearance by the defendant each party made a motion for summary judgment. … In People v.

Jordan v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

175 Cal. App. 3d 162 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 2, 1985

Our review of the decision of the Board is, of course, confined to a determination of whether, under the relevant law, the decision is supported by substantial evidence. (Judson Steel Corp. v. Workers’ Comp. … Appeals Bd., supra; LeVesque v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1970) 1 Cal.3d 627 [ 83 Cal.Rptr. 208 , 463 P.2d 432 ].)

Baroid v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

121 Cal. App. 3d 558 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 14, 1981

Council v. Ind. Acc. Com. … Co. v. Workers’ Comp.

Rosas v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

16 Cal. App. 4th 1692 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 9, 1993

This standard is not met “by simply isolating evidence which supports the board and ignoring other relevant facts of record which rebut or explain that evidence.” (Garza v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … (City of Santa Ana v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1982) 128 Cal.App.3d 212, 219 [ 180 Cal.Rptr. 125 ].) Ill The Board relied on the opinions of Drs. Ogrod and Whorton in denying reconsideration. But, Dr.

Pettigrew v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

48 Cal. Rptr. 3d 922 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 26, 2006

appeals board acted without or in excess of its powers. … He cites Wright v.

Yee v. State Board of Equalization

16 Cal. App. 2d 417 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 3, 1936

From that judgment the state board appeals. … Kraker v. Superior Court, 15 Cal. App. 651 [ 115 Pac. 663 ], is authority for the proposition that writ of review is the proper remedy herein.

Mihesuah v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

55 Cal. App. 3d 720 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 25, 1976

Division Three of this court granted review, annulled the opinion and order, and remanded the cause to the Board for further proceedings. (Mihesuah v. Workmen’s Comp. … (Hegglin v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra, 4 Cal.3d 162, 172-174.)

McPherson v. Public Employment Relations Board

189 Cal. App. 3d 293 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 11, 1987

Co. v. National L.R. Board, supra, at p. 874.) … N.L.R.B. v. Ford Motor Co. (6th Cir. 1982) 683 F.2d 156 ; National Labor Relations Board v.

Decker v. Board of Health Commissioners

6 Cal. App. 2d 334 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 20, 1935

(Boyd v. Pendegast, 57 Cal. … In the case of Sponogle v.

Nash v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

24 Cal. App. 4th 1793 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 21, 1994

No reason has been presented for second-guessing this assessment of credibility, to which the Board properly deferred. (Garza v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … (See, e.g., Fisk v. Workers’ Comp.

Gallegos v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

273 Cal. App. 2d 569 · California Court of Appeal · May 29, 1969

The opinion of the appeals board noted that both Dr. … In Danziger v. Industrial Acc.

Malloy v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

1 Cal. App. 4th 1658 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 24, 1991

One) held in Southwest Airlines v. Workers’ Comp. … In Hollister Convalescent Hosp., Inc. v.

Carlsen v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

64 Cal. App. 3d 577 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 6, 1976

Bank v. Greenville Nat. Bank, 84 Tex. 40 , 19 S.W. 334 ; Easton v. … In People v.

Allison v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

72 Cal. App. 4th 654 · California Court of Appeal · May 27, 1999

In Hardesty v. … .; and Hardesty was impliedly approved of, on another point, by this division in Ford v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (1994) 59 Cal.Comp.Cases 789, 791, writ denied.

Perry v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

66 Cal. App. 3d 887 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 8, 1977

We note that the above rule was applied by the Board when it was known as the Industrial Accident Commission, in the case of Hoertkorn v. Henry F. Budde Publications, 14 Cal.Comp. Cases 127. … Exchange v. Ind. Acc. Com., 27 Cal.2d 813, 816 [ 167 P.2d 705 ]; Hulbert v. Workmen’s Comp.

Medrano v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

167 Cal. App. 4th 56 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 25, 2008

(See Ritchie v. Workers’ Comp. … (a)(5); Kim v. Workers’ Comp.

Aten v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

75 Cal. App. 3d 113 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 16, 1977

The Wilkinson court reached that result by following the reasoning of the board’s decision in Bauer v. County of Los Angeles (1969) 34 Cal. Comp. Cases 594 . … Upon remand, the board may, if it thinks proper, reject the stipulation apportioning between the two pending cases (see Turner Gas Co. v. *121 Workmen's Comp.