Case law

Rivera v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

190 Cal. App. 3d 1452 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 8, 1987

The Board granted reconsideration, reversed the WCJ, and reinstated the Bureau’s May 7, 1984, decision terminating rehabilitation benefits. The Board, citing its panel decision in another case (Perez v. … (See Bland v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1970) 3 Cal.3d 324 [ 90 Cal.Rptr. 431 , 475 P.2d 663 ]; Blanchard v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1975) 53 Cal.App.3d 590 [ 126 Cal.Rptr. 187 ]; Beaida v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

Hoppmann v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

226 Cal. App. 3d 1119 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 11, 1991

The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) reversed the workers’ compensation judge (WCJ). … Board correctly states that the payments to petitioner are not necessarily wages just because they are in cash. (Cf. Barragan v. Workers’ Comp.

Sternoff v. State Board of Equalization

103 Cal. App. 3d 828 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 26, 1980

Board, presents somewhat different contentions than do the plaintiffs in Sternoff et al. v. Board. … C 200968—Sternoff et al. v. Board, the judgment is affirmed. In case No. C 205685, Lyon et al. v.

Pebworth v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

10 Cal. Rptr. 3d 832 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 9, 2004

An employee, joined by his employer, petitions for review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, finding that amendments to Labor Code section 4646, 1 effective January 1, 2003, do not apply to injuries occurring … In a Compromise and Release approved by respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) in November 2002, the parties settled all issues except vocational rehabilitation benefits.

Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Board of Equalization

241 Cal. App. 4th 19 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 8, 2015

Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1961) 191 Cal.App.2d 20, 24 [“Sales tax statutes do not impose a tax on services . . .”]; Preston v. … For support, the Board cites Pierce v. Underwood (1987) 487 U.S. 552, 569 (Pierce).

California Teachers Assn. v. Governing Board

45 Cal. App. 4th 1383 · California Court of Appeal · May 30, 1996

The school board filed a timely notice of appeal. … (See James v. Board of Education of Central Dist. No. 1, Etc. (2d Cir. 1972) 461 F.2d 566, 573 (James).)

Allen v. State Board of Equalization

43 Cal. App. 2d 90 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 17, 1941

Petitioners had been certified as eligible for, and had been appointed to, positions of “collector” of State Board of Equalization. … A situation similar to that of petitioners was presented to the court in the case of Pinion v. State Personnel Board, 29 Cal.

Jimenez v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

1 Cal. App. 4th 61 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 22, 1991

(Hofmeister v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1984) 156 Cal.App.3d 848, 852 [ 203 Cal.Rptr. 100 ].) … (Aetna Cas. & Surety Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com. (Charlesworth) (1947) 30 Cal.2d 388, 393 [ 182 P.2d 159 ].)

Maples v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

111 Cal. App. 3d 827 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 6, 1980

Fund v. Industrial Acc. Com. … (Huston v. Workers' Comp.

Abron v. Workmen's Comp. Appeals Board

34 Cal. App. 3d 232 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 12, 1973

Bd., 4 Cal.3d 162, 174-175 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 15 , 480 P.2d 967 ]; Pence v. Industrial Acc. Com., 63 Cal.2d 48, 50-51 [ 45 Cal.Rptr. 12 , 403 P.2d 140 ]; Kaiser Co. v. Industrial Acc. … (See Rogers Materials Co. v. Ind. Acc. Com., 63 Cal.2d 717, 723 [ 48 Cal.Rptr. 129 , 408 P.2d 737 ].)

Board of Retirement v. Superior Court

124 Cal. Rptr. 2d 850 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 5, 2002

(Weber v. Board of Retirement (1998) 62 Cal.App.4th 1440, 1442 [ 73 Cal.Rptr.2d 769 ].) … (Gutierrez v. Board of Retirement (1998) 62 Cal.App.4th 745, 748 [ 72 Cal.Rptr.2d 837 ].) 3 The 31452 exemption was originally enacted as section 32 of the County Employees Retirement Act of 1937.

Steinberg v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

87 Cal. App. 3d 582 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 20, 1978

The cases of King v. California Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd. (1972) 25 Cal.App.3d 199 [ 101 Cal.Rptr. 660 ] and Thornton v. … There the board found that the order was an unreasonable one.

Russ v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

125 Cal. App. 3d 834 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 19, 1981

(See § 101; see also, e.g., California Human Resources Dept. v. Java (1971) 402 U.S. 121, 125 [ 28 L.Ed.2d 666, 670 , 915 S.Ct. 1347 ]; Gillum v. … (Morse v. Municipal Court (1974) 13 Cal.3d 149, 156 [ 118 Cal.Rptr. 14 , 529 P.2d 46 }; People v. Baker (1968) 69 Cal.2d 44, 50 [ 69 Cal.Rptr. 595 , 442 P.2d 675 ]; People v.

Hanna v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

32 Cal. App. 3d 719 · California Court of Appeal · May 31, 1973

The referee concluded the claim was untimely, and the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board upheld the referee's conclusion. … (See Chavez v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd., 31 Cal.App.3d 5 [ 106 Cal.Rptr. 853 ].)

MCA, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board

115 Cal. App. 3d 185 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1981

Four such cases are: Burgess v. State, 71 Cal.App.2d 412 , 162 P.2d 855 (1945); Burnham v. Franchise Tax Board, 172 Cal.App.2d 438 , 341 P.2d 833 (1959); Clemens v. Franchise Tax Board, 172 Cal. … App.2d 446 , 341 P.2d 838 (1959); Crocker-Anglo National Bank v. Franchise Tax Board, 179 Cal.App.2d 591 , 3 Cal.Rptr. 906 (1960). “d.

Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

191 Cal. App. 3d 127 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 16, 1987

Goodman v. … A purported finding by the Board or its referee on a question of law is not binding on the appellate court.” (Meyer v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1984) 157 Cal.App.3d 1036, 1042 [ 204 Cal.Rptr. 74 ].)

Sakotas v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

95 Cal. Rptr. 2d 153 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 26, 2000

(Kenneally v. Medical Board, supra, 27 Cal.App.4th at pp. 495-496, fn. omitted.) Sakotas, no more than Dr. Kenneally, does not belong to a suspect class. … Sakotas would have the result of her constitutional attack on section 3208.3, subdivision (b)(1) determined by Brown v.

Humphrys v. Board of Dental Examiners

87 Cal. App. 205 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 1927

The accusation is in substance identical with that considered in Messner v. Board of Dental Examiners, ante, p. 199 [ 262 Pac. 58 ]. … (Osborne v. Baughman, 85 Cal. App. 224 [ 259 Pac. 70 ].) The demurrer to the petition is overruled and the order suspending petitioner’s license to practice dentistry is annulled.

Hayssen v. Board of Zoning Adjustments

171 Cal. App. 3d 400 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 22, 1985

(Horn v. County of Ventura (1979) 24 Cal.3d 605, 614 [ 156 Cal.Rptr. 718 , 596 P.2d 1134 ]; San Diego Bldg. Contractors Assn. v. … (Horn v. County of Ventura, supra, 24 Cal.3d at p. 618 .) A case-by-case determination of the constitutional adequacy of notice thus continues to be the rule. *406 Appellants rely on Schroeder v.

Amaro v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

65 Cal. App. 3d 715 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 6, 1977

De Somov was followed by Boren v. … Portland Cement Co. v. Cal. Unemp. Ins.