Case law

Jameson v. Board of Dental Examiners

118 Cal. App. 105 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 2, 1931

(Burnham v. Terrell, 97 Tex. 309 [ 78 S. W. 500 ], To the same effect are Weaver v. Devendorf, 3 Denio (N. Y.), 117; Fausler v. Parsons, 6 W. Va. 486 [ 20 Am. Rep. 431 ]; Williams v. Weaver, 75 N. Y. 30; Chrisman v. … All intendments are in favor of the accused (Messner v. Board of Dental Examiners, 87 Cal.

Nast v. State Board of Equalization

46 Cal. App. 4th 343 · California Court of Appeal · May 8, 1996

The Franchise Tax Board (FTB) rejected those objections. The State Board of Equalization (SBE) agreed with FTB. Nast asked SBE to reconsider. It declined. … The petitioner relies strongly on Laisne v. State Board of Optometry, 19 Cal.2d 831 . . . .

Savoy Club v. Board of Supervisors

12 Cal. App. 3d 1034 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 19, 1970

Webster v. Board of Dental Examiners (1941) 17 C2d 534, 537, 110 P2d 992, 994 .” There is one further deviation in the Silver decision from the California view respecting due process in such matters. … In DeMartini v.

Angelier v. State Board of Pharmacy

58 Cal. App. 4th 592 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 16, 1997

(James v. Board of Dental Examiners (1985) 172 Cal.App.3d 1096, 1105 [ 218 Cal.Rptr. 710 ].) … (Mansell v. Board of Administration (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 539, 544 [ 35 Cal.Rptr.2d 574 ].) 9 These same arguments were made by the plaintiff in Schneider v.

Varanelli v. Structural Pest Control Board

1 Cal. App. 3d 217 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 1969

(See Doyle v. Board of Barber Examiners, supra, 219 Cal.App.2d at pp. 505-515.) In Daniel v. Family Security Life Ins. … (See also, Rosenblatt v. California State Board of Pharmacy, 69 Cal.App.2d 69 [ 158 P.2d 199 ]; People v. Jordan, 172 Cal. 391, 398-400 [ 156 P. 451 ].)

Yee Chuck v. Board of Trustees

179 Cal. App. 2d 405 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 4, 1960

Defendant, the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University (Stanford), claims error in giving and refusing instructions. … The presence on flat land of an old floor of an outhouse with some stones and boards on it would be no warning to anyone that it covered a hole over 30 feet deep and 3 feet square, especially when there were other boards

Morales v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

186 Cal. App. 3d 283 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 8, 1986

Fund v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. … We note that respondents do not contend that applicant’s work was required pursuant to an order of the board of supervisors. In Pruitt v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

Sakotas v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

95 Cal. Rptr. 2d 153 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 26, 2000

(Kenneally v. Medical Board, supra, 27 Cal.App.4th at pp. 495-496, fn. omitted.) Sakotas, no more than Dr. Kenneally, does not belong to a suspect class. … Sakotas would have the result of her constitutional attack on section 3208.3, subdivision (b)(1) determined by Brown v.

Rowen v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

119 Cal. App. 3d 633 · California Court of Appeal · May 28, 1981

(Chosick v. Reilly (1954) 125 Cal.App.2d 334, 338 [ 270 P.2d 547 ]; see also, Griggs v. Board of Trustees (1964) 61 Cal.2d 93, 98 [ 37 Cal.Rptr. 194 , 389 P.2d 722 ].) … or any member thereof,’ and is a power which may not be delegated by the appeals board to a referee.”

Vela v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

22 Cal. App. 3d 513 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 29, 1971

(Garza v. Workmen's Comp. App. Bd., supra.) However, both the referee and the appeals board “must accept as true the intended meaning of [evidence] both uncontradicted and unimpeached.” (McAllister v. Workmen's Comp. … Fund v. Ind. Acc.

Stover v. Stevens

21 Cal. App. 261 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 19, 1913

(Knox v. Higby, 76 Cal. 264 , [18 Pac. 381]; Henry v. Southern Pacific R. R. Co., 50 Cal. 176 .) … with the statute of frauds, citing Freeman v.

Ulrich v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

50 Cal. App. 3d 643 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 14, 1975

In Ruk v. … Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1966) 65 Cal.2d 438 at page 445 [ 55 Cal.Rptr. 254 , 421 P.2d 102 ], (Cf. Kerley v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

Leamon v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

190 Cal. App. 3d 1409 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 7, 1987

The Board, relying upon Judson Steel Corp. v. Workers’ Comp. … We have examined the record and conclude that the Board’s findings on these points are supported by substantial evidence. II-V * Disposition The decisions of the Board are affirmed. Evans, Acting P.

Clemmens v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

261 Cal. App. 2d 1 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 14, 1968

(Western Metal Supply Co. v. Pillsbury, 172 Cal. 407 [ 156 P. 491 , Ann.Cas. 1917E 390] [night watchman found dead from gunshot wound]; Western Grain etc. Co. v. … Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 86 Cal.App.2d 726 [ 195 P.2d 919 ] [an explosion]; Madin v. Industrial Acc. Com., 46 Cal. 2d 90 [ 292 P.2d 892 ] [runaway bulldozer]; Truck Insurance Exchange v. Industrial Acc.

Humphrys v. Board of Dental Examiners

87 Cal. App. 205 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 30, 1927

The accusation is in substance identical with that considered in Messner v. Board of Dental Examiners, ante, p. 199 [ 262 Pac. 58 ]. … (Osborne v. Baughman, 85 Cal. App. 224 [ 259 Pac. 70 ].) The demurrer to the petition is overruled and the order suspending petitioner’s license to practice dentistry is annulled.

Chu v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

49 Cal. App. 4th 1176 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 1, 1996

See also Beauchamp v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1968) 259 Cal.App.2d 147, 153-154 [ 66 Cal.Rptr. 352 ] (Beauchamp), Donovan v. Workers’ Comp. … (Rulbalcava v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 220 Cal.App.3d at p. 908 .) The Board relied solely on Dr. Reiss’s opinion.

Martinez v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

101 Cal. Rptr. 2d 406 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 15, 2000

The jurisdiction of the appeals board in these cases shall be a continuing jurisdiction within this period. ...” … (Poole v. Workers’ Comp.

Packer v. Board of Medical Examiners

37 Cal. App. 3d 63 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 1974

(Yakov v. Board of Medical Examiners (1968) 68 Cal.2d 67, 69 [ 64 Cal.Rptr. 785 , 435 P.2d 553 ]; Magit v. Board of Medical Examiners (1961) *69 57 Cal.2d 74, 80 [ 17 Cal.Rptr. 488 , 366 P.2d 816 ].) … (Merrill v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1969) 71 Cal.2d 907, 915 [ 80 Cal.Rptr. 89 , 458 P.2d 33 ]; Yakov v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, 68 Cal.2d at p. 69 ; Collins v. Board of Medical Examiners (1972) 29 Cal.

Bartosh v. Board of Osteophatic Examiners

82 Cal. App. 2d 486 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 20, 1947

Co. v. Reed Orchard Co., 177 Cal. 249, 254 [ 170 P. 426 ]; People v. Crossley, 261 Ill. 78 [ 103 N.E. 537, 540]; Crohn v. Kansas City etc. Co., 131 Mo. 313 [ 109 S.W. 1068, 1070 ]; Savage v. … Wallace, 165 Ala. 572 [ 51 So. 605, 607 ] ; Culver v. People, 161 Ill. 89 [ 43 N.E. 812, 814 ] ; City of Charlston v. Johnston, 170 Ill. 336 [ 48 N.E. 985, 986 ]; Town of Cicero v.

Baroid v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

121 Cal. App. 3d 558 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 14, 1981

Council v. Ind. Acc. Com. … Co. v. Workers’ Comp.