Case law

Costa v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

77 Cal. Rptr. 2d 289 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 30, 1998

(Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d at p. 180 .) … (Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d at pp. 180-181.)

Morehouse v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

154 Cal. App. 3d 323 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 10, 1984

Code, tit. 8, ch. 4.5, § 10447; see Ray v. Industrial Acc. … prosecutor.” 4 City of Anaheim v.

Morris v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

34 Cal. App. 3d 1002 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 30, 1973

(See King v. California Unemployment Ins. Appeals Board, 25 Cal.App.3d 199, 204 [ 101 Cal.Rptr. 660 ].) … (Byrd v. Savage, 219 Cal.App. 2d 396, 402 [ 32 Cal.Rptr. 881 ]; Sica v. Board of Police Commissioners, 200 Cal.App.2d 137, 142 [ 19 Cal.Rptr. 277 ]; Strode v.

Schoenen v. Board of Medical Examiners

245 Cal. App. 2d 909 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 26, 1966

(Dare v. Board of Medical Examiners, 21 Cal.2d 790 [ 136 P.2d 304 ] ; Russell v. Miller, 21 Cal.2d 817 [ 136 P.2d 318 ] ; Sipper v. Urban, 22 Cal.2d 138 [ 137 P.2d 425 ].) … (Dare v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, at p. 799; Id., at pp. 805-809 (concurring and dissenting opinion of Traynor, J.); Ashdown v. State of Calif.

Verga v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

70 Cal. Rptr. 3d 871 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 25, 2008

The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (the WCAB) concluded that Rosemary Verga was not entitled to compensation for psychiatric injury while employed by United Airlines. … Prior to enactment of the statute, this court held in Albertson’s, Inc. v. Workers’ Comp.

Flores v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

36 Cal. App. 3d 388 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 27, 1973

Respondents rely on Marshall v. Ransome Concrete Co., 33 Cal.App. 782 [ 166 P. 846 ], Danziger v. Industrial Acc. Com., 109 Cal.App. 71 [ 292 P. 525 ], and Gallegos v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … The decision of the appeals board is annulled, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings consistent with the views expressed herein. Franson, J., concurred. See Solari v.

Munoz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

19 Cal. App. 3d 144 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 6, 1971

(Bloomington-Bedford Stone Co. v. Phillips, 65 Ind.App. 189 [ 116 N.E. 850 ].)” … Co. v. Industrial Acc.

Leeth v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

186 Cal. App. 3d 1550 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 14, 1986

Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. … (Stewart v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1978) 80 Cal.App.3d 172, 179 [ 143 Cal.Rptr. 641 ]; also see Landrum v. Superior Court (1981) 30 Cal.3d 1, 14 [ 177 Cal.Rptr. 325 , 634 P.2d 352 ]; Moyer v.

McLeod v. Board of Pension Commissioners

14 Cal. App. 3d 23 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 30, 1970

Superior Court (1959) 53 Cal.2d 236, 244 [ 1 Cal.Rptr. 158 , 347 P.2d 294 ]; Jacobs v. Board of Supervisors (1893) 100 Cal. 121, 128-129 [ 34 P. 630 ]; Gong v. … (Klench v. Board of Pension Fund Comrs. (1926) 79 Cal. App. 171, 179 [ 249 P. 46 ].)

People Ex Rel. Brown v. Tri-Union Seafoods, LLC

171 Cal. App. 4th 1549 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 11, 2009

First, relying heavily on Nicolle-Wagner v. … Sander Greenland. 15 A poster is a large sheet of paper displayed on a board that contains summaries of findings through a combination of text, figures and photographs.

Board of Pilot Commissioners v. Superior Court

218 Cal. App. 4th 577 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 1, 2013

(Hochstetler v. … (See Forsham v.

Todd v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

198 Cal. App. 3d 757 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 18, 1988

The Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board agreed with the judge and denied reconsideration. We granted the applicant’s petition for a writ of review. … (Meyer v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1984) 157 Cal.App.3d 1036, 1044 [ 204 Cal.Rptr. 74 ].) The Board’s order denying reconsideration is affirmed. Kline, P. J., and Benson, J., concurred.

Toccalino v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

128 Cal. App. 3d 543 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 8, 1982

In Anderson v. Workers’ Comp. … The board upheld this finding of the hearing judge. In Smith v. Workers’ Comp.

Dyer v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

22 Cal. App. 4th 1376 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 1994

VII, §§ 2, 3; Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 193 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ].) … Code, §§ 19180, 19584; Wallace v. State Personnel Board (1962) 204 Cal.App.2d 759, 763-764 [ 22 Cal.Rptr. 614 ]).

Ashley v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

37 Cal. App. 4th 320 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 1, 1995

(King v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1991) 231 Cal.App.3d 1640, 1646-1647 [ 283 Cal.Rptr. 98 ].) … (Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].) In order to determine the legislative intent in enacting the statute, we turn first to the actual language of the statute itself.

Javor v. State Board of Equalization

73 Cal. App. 3d 939 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 5, 1977

Section 6451. 3 Holland Furnace Co. v. State Board of Equalization (1960) 177 Cal.App.2d 672 [ 2 Cal.Rptr. 606 ]. The Board asserts that Javor v. … Tally v. Ganahl (1907) 151 Cal. 418, 421 [ 90 P. 1049 ]; Gyerman v.

Johnson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

163 Cal. App. 3d 770 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 17, 1985

(Muznik v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1975) 51 Cal.App.3d 622, 635 [ 124 Cal.Rptr. 407 ]; accord Hamilton v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 587, 592-593 [ 155 Cal.Rptr. 721 ]; Hart v. Workers’ Comp. … But here the board’s only error was that it did not make a finding on the factual issue presented. Moreover, here the evidence is so clear that no factual issue is raised. The question is one of law. (Cf. Dimmig v.

Vierra v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

65 Cal. Rptr. 3d 423 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 31, 2007

(See Finnegan v. Schrader (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 572, 583 [ 110 Cal.Rptr.2d 552 ]; Board of Education v. … Board of Supervisors (1992) 2 Cal.4th 571, 577 [ 7 Cal.Rptr.2d 245 , 828 P.2d 147 ].) “This principle applies whether the specific provision was passed before or after the general enactment.” (Miller v.

Martin v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

59 Cal. App. 4th 333 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 19, 1997

Attorney-client Privilege When this court ordered the WCAB to determine whether the witness statements requested by Martin were privileged, we referred the board to D. I. Chadbourne, Inc. v. … Co. v.

Morgan v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

85 Cal. App. 3d 710 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 24, 1978

Fund v. Industrial Acc. Com. (Hutchinson), supra, 59 Cal.2d 45 ; Mercier v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd., supra, 16 Cal.3d 711 ; State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd. … Fund v. Workers’ Comp. Appeals Bd.