Case law

Ayala v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

54 Cal. App. 3d 676 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 22, 1976

Appellant relies on Alonso v. … Kline (1973) 412 U.S. 441 [ 37 L.Ed.2d 63 , 93 S.Ct. 2230 ]; Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur (1974) 414 U.S. 632 [ 39 L.Ed.2d 52 , 94 S.Ct. 791 ].

Ryan v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

265 Cal. App. 2d 654 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 12, 1968

The board may not “rest a decision on medical *660 reports that are no longer germane.” (Jones v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra, 68 Cal.2d 476, 480 .) … (Hogeberg v. Industrial Acc. Com., 201 Cal. 169,176 [ 256 P. 413 ].) The board and the insurance fund contend the 1966 order was res judicata on the issue of disability.

Rodriguez v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

30 Cal. App. 4th 1425 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 10, 1994

(Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].) In determining such intent, “[t]he court turns first to the *1432 words themselves for the answer.” (People v. … See, e.g., Edgington v.

Davis v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

43 Cal. App. 3d 71 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 14, 1974

(Maywood Glass Co. v. Stewart, 170 Cal.App.2d 719, 724 [ 339 P.2d 947 ], quoting Boynton Cab Co. v. Neubeck, 237 Wis. 249 [ 296 N.W. 636, 640 ]; Lacy v. California Unemployment Ins. … Delgado v. Unemployment Ins.

Jenkins v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

48 Cal. App. 3d 570 · California Court of Appeal · May 29, 1975

Thus, discretion to commute the award is granted to the board; discretion granted to the board, however, may not be exercised in an arbitrary manner (Garcia v. Industrial Acc. … The policy expressed in Labor Code section 3202 applies equally to “the courts” and to the board (Gross v. Workmen’s Camp. Appeals Bd (1975) 44 Cal.App.3d 397, 402-403 [ 118 Cal.Rptr. 609 ]; Beaida v. Workmen’s Comp.

Schweizer v. Local Joint Executive Board

121 Cal. App. 2d 45 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 3, 1953

Parkimson Co. v. … Market Co. v.

Charles v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

202 Cal. App. 3d 781 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 30, 1988

The appeals board affirmed. We conclude Charles was a firefighter within the meaning of the statute and annul the board’s order. … (See generally San Francisco v. Pacific Tel. & Tel. Co. (1913) 166 Cal. 244, 251 [ 135 P. 971 ]; Marrujo v. Hunt (1977) 71 Cal.App.3d 972, 977 [ 138 Cal.Rptr. 220 ]; People v.

Hinson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

42 Cal. App. 3d 246 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 2, 1974

(Hinojosa v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd., 8 Cal.3d 150, 156-157 [ 104 Cal.Rptr. 456 , 501 P.2d 1176 ].) … There is substantial evidence in the record to support the board’s decision. The order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board is affirmed. Brown (G. A.), P. J., and Gargano, J., concurred.

Fisher v. Board of Police Commissioners

236 Cal. App. 2d 298 · California Court of Appeal · Aug 3, 1965

to the board. … (See Fascination, Inc. v. Hoover, 39 Cal.2d 260, 269 [ 246 P.2d 656 ]; Walters v. Pine Cove County Water Dist., 177 Cal.App.2d 498 [ 2 Cal.Rptr. 253 ]; Sobo v.

Chaplin v. State Personnel Board

California Court of Appeal · Sep 23, 2020

(Ibid.; see also Yamaha Corp. of America v. … (American Coatings Assn. v.

Youngblood v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

216 Cal. App. 3d 764 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 15, 1989

The Board issued its decision denying applicant’s petition for reconsideration on June 6, 1988. Relying on Bekins Moving & Storage Co. v. Workers’ Comp. … on Beaida v.

Pope v. State Board of Equalization

146 Cal. App. 3d 1132 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 14, 1983

(Mooney v. Pickett (1971) 4 Cal.3d 669, 679 [ 94 Cal.Rptr. 279 , 483 P.2d 1231 ]; Gov. Code, § 11342.2.) … (Woods v. Superior Court (1981) 28 Cal.3d 668, 679 [ 170 Cal.Rptr. 484 , 620 P.2d 1032 ]; Simplicity Pattern Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1980) 27 Cal.3d 900, 905 [ 167 Cal.Rptr. 366 , 615 P.2d 555 ].)

Hopkins v. Contractors' State License Board

240 Cal. App. 2d 710 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 11, 1966

In Hope v. Contractors’ etc. … (Boteler v. Robinson, 105 Cal.App. 611 [ 288 P. 135 ].) The judgment is reversed with directions to enter a judgment denying the writ. Brown (Gerald), P. J., and Coughlin, J., concurred.

Finnerty v. Board of Registered Nursing

168 Cal. App. 4th 219 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 13, 2008

(Bixby v. Pierno (1971) 4 Cal.3d 130 , 143-144 & fn. 10 [ 93 Cal.Rptr. 234 , 481 P.2d 242 ]; Yakov v. Board of Medical Examiners (1968) 68 Cal.2d 67, 69 [ 64 Cal.Rptr. 785 , 435 P.2d 553 ] (Yakov): Hildebrand v. … The Board of Registered Nursing is to recover its costs on appeal.

Harold v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

100 Cal. App. 3d 772 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 8, 1980

(Rumbaugh v. Workers’ Comp. … The Wilkinson court reached that result by following the reasoning of the Board’s en banc opinion in Bauer v. County of Los Angeles (1969) 34 Cal.Comp.Cases 594.

Zipton v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

218 Cal. App. 3d 980 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 14, 1990

(Saal v. Workmen’s Comp. Appeals Bd. (1975) 50 Cal.App.3d 291, 297 [123 *988 Cal.Rptr. 506]; Smith v. Workmen's Comp. … . (§ 3202.5; Wehr v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (1985) 165 Cal.App.3d 188, 193 [ 211 Cal.Rptr. 321 ]; California State Polytechnic University v. Workers’ Comp.

McGlinn v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

68 Cal. App. 3d 527 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 4, 1977

Since there is industrial causation, the board improperly denied the claimed benefits by apportioning them to a “non-industrial” cause if one exists. (Granado v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … (Granado v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd., supra, 69 Cal.2d 399 at p. 401.)

Brennfleck v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

265 Cal. App. 2d 738 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 16, 1968

The appeals board ordered a 30-day extension of the time within which it could act on the petition. (Lab. Code, § 5909.) May 22, 1967. Reconsideration was granted by the appeals board. Another hearing was ordered. … review more meaningful (Evans v.

Pennington v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

20 Cal. App. 3d 55 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 17, 1971

(See Stafford v. L. A. etc. Retirement Board (1954) 42 Cal.2d 795 [ 270 P.2d 12 ].) But those sections were repealed in 1959. … Jefferson, J., and Dunn, J., concurred. 1 The opinion of the respondent board and the brief of petitioner discuss the effect of the decisions in City of Palo Alto v. Industrial Acc. Com.

Patterson v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

53 Cal. App. 3d 916 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 19, 1975

In Place v. Workmen's Comp. App. … This procedural demand aims at revealing the basis of the Board’s action, at avoidance of careless or arbitrary action, and at assisting meaningful judicial review. (LeVesque v. Workmen's Comp. App.