Case law

Williams v. Public Employment Relations Board

204 Cal. App. 4th 1119 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 13, 2012

(See Abood v. Detroit Board of Education (1977) 431 U.S. 209, 234-235 [ 52 L.Ed.2d 261 , 97 S.Ct. 1782 ].) … Lehnert v.

Hahn v. State Board of Equalization

87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 282 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 28, 1999

(Milligan v. … Code, §§ 452, 459; State Bd. of Equalization v.

Anaconda Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

130 Cal. App. 3d 15 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 24, 1982

(Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax Bd., supra, 117 Cal.App.3d 988, 998 ; Standard Register Co. v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, 259 Cal.App.2d 125, 136 .) … (Coca-Cola Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization (1945) 25 Cal.2d 918, 921 [ 156 P.2d 1 ]; also see Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 647 [ 335 P.2d 672 ]; Container Corp. of America v.

Sobiniak v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

156 Cal. App. 3d 448 · California Court of Appeal · May 25, 1984

On March 9, 1982, a board referee ordered that UEF be joined as a party defendant. … The order of respondent Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board denying reconsideration is affirmed. Gilbert, J., and Abbe, J., concurred.

Redmond v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

36 Cal. App. 3d 302 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 27, 1973

We have concluded that the board’s decision is not supported by substantial evidence in light of the entire record. In Garza v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … Our function on appellate review is to determine whether the decision of the board is supported by substantial evidence in light of the entire record. (LeVesque v. Workmen’s Comp. App.

Fahmy v. Medical Board of California

38 Cal. App. 4th 810 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 26, 1995

(Id. at p. 189; see also Brown v. State Personnel Bd. (1985) 166 Cal.App.3d 1151, 1159 [ 213 Cal.Rptr. 53 ] [“ ‘[d]elay is not a bar unless it works to the disadvantage or prejudice of other parties.’ ”].) … the Medical Board to act. 4 *817 Fahmy and the trial court relied on the case of Brown v.

Ceridian Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board

102 Cal. Rptr. 2d 611 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 18, 2001

The Board relies primarily on a footnote in a 65-year-old Supreme Court case. In Colgate v. … (a) & (b).) 4 The Board thus misspeaks when it cites United States v.

Smyers v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

157 Cal. App. 3d 36 · California Court of Appeal · Jun 12, 1984

In late 1982 employer discontinued the payments for housekeeping services relying upon the Board’s decision in Keil v. … (Keil v. State of California, supra, 46 Cal.Comp.Cases at pp. 701-702, italics in original.) The Board in formulating the Keil rule looked at section 4600 in a strict definitional sense.

Wall v. Board of Regents, UC

38 Cal. App. 2d 698 · California Court of Appeal · May 2, 1940

The court cannot substitute its judgment for that of the directors. ’ ’ (Hamilton v. United Laundries, 111 N. J. Eq. 78 [ 161 Atl. 347 ]; Harris v. Brown, 6 Fed. (2d) 922; McConoughey v. … Nothing in the petition indicates that the grievances of the petitioner have ever been made known to any member of the board of regents or that a demand upon the board of regents would have been futile.

Barron v. Board of Dental Examiners

44 Cal. App. 2d 790 · California Court of Appeal · May 15, 1941

(See Webster v. Board of Dental Examiners, 17 Cal. (2d) 534 [ 110 Pac. (2d) 992 ] ; Semler v. Oregon State Board, 294 U. S. 608 [55 Sup. Ct. 570, 79 L. Ed. 1086 ].) … (Donovan v. Board of Police Commrs., 32 Cal. App. 392, 403 [ 163 Pac. 69 ]; see, also, Horstmeyer v. Trial Board, 21 Cal. App. (2d) 533 [ 69 Pac. (2d) 1021 ].)

Jones v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

20 Cal. App. 3d 124 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 20, 1971

The ruling by the Board plainly is subject to our independent review. (Crown City Lodge, etc. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 10 Cal.App.2d 83, 86 [ 51 P.2d 143 ]; Van Horn v. Industrial Acc. … employee: Olsen v.

Royster v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

40 Cal. App. 3d 412 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 2, 1974

This rule is expressed in Young v. Industrial Acc. … If, therefore, the statement which the commission quotes from Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corp. v. Industrial Acc.

MacOmber v. State Social Welfare Board

175 Cal. App. 2d 614 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 27, 1959

McAllister v. … No. 5 v.

Matteson v. State Board of Education

57 Cal. App. 2d 991 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 7, 1943

The state credential is issued by the State Board of Education, through the Commission of Credentials; the other by the local board of education; and the state school law confers upon each board the power to revoke or suspend … by law for the hearing of charges for the revocation or suspension of a certificate by a county board of education”; that “the county board of education, after such hearing, shall report to the state board ... its findings

Hooker v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

36 Cal. App. 3d 698 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 14, 1974

Co. v. Ind. Acc. … The board’s reasoning in the above decision is persuasiye and in accord with the conclusions expressed herein. In Chavez v. Workmen’s Comp.

Sautter v. Contractors' State License Board

124 Cal. App. 2d 149 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 1954

(Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners, 32 Cal.2d 301, 308 [ 196 P.2d 20 ]; Manning v. Watson, 108 Cal.App.2d 705, 712 [ 239 P.2d 688 ].) … (Moran v. Board of Medical Examiners, 32 Cal.2d 301 [ 196 P.2d 20 ].) It may be said here as was said in Norwood v.

National Asian American Coalition v. Brown

California Court of Appeal · Jul 10, 2018

(California School Boards Assn. v. State (2011) 192 Cal.App.4th 770, 788.) … (California School Boards Assn. v. State, supra, 192 Cal.App.4th at p. 788.)

Edgar v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

246 Cal. App. 2d 660 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 28, 1966

(Consolidated Western Steel Div. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 205 Cal.App.2d 275, 278 [23 Cal.Rptr. 147]; Pullman Co. v. Industrial Acc. … Co. v. Industrial Acc.

Janzen v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

61 Cal. App. 4th 109 · California Court of Appeal · Dec 30, 1997

. — Petitioner, Stephanie Janzen, seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board) dismissing her application for death benefits. … (See Raps v. Raps (1942) 20 Cal.2d 382, 384-385 [ 125 P.2d 826 ]; 2 Witkin, op. cit. supra, Jurisdiction, § 198, pp. 763-764.) Relying on Goodwine v.

Smith v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

123 Cal. App. 3d 763 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 21, 1981

In Eagles Home Assn. v. Indus. Acc. … Shipbuilding Corp. v. Ind. Acc. Com. (1946) *775 27 Cal.2d 536, 541-542 [ 165 P.2d 669 ]; Riskin v. Ind. Acc. Com. (1943) 23 Cal.2d 248, 254 [ 144 P.2d 16 ].) The decision of the board is affirmed. Franson, Acting P.