Case law

Davis v. Franchise Tax Board

71 Cal. App. 3d 998 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 26, 1977

The Franchise Tax Board and the State Board of Equalization denied their claim. The trial court sustained the taxing agencies and plaintiffs appeal. … (Travis v. Yale & Towne Manufacturing Co., supra, 252 U.S. at pp. 80-81 [64 L.Ed. at pp. 469-470]; Maxwell v. Bugbee, supra, 250 U.S. at p. 543 [63 L.Ed. at pp. 1132-1133]; see also Morey v.

Johnson v. Board of Education

179 Cal. App. 3d 593 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 1, 1986

Respondent contends that Education Code section 35160 expressly supersedes Pasadena School Dist. v. Pasadena (1913) 166 Cal. 7 [ 134 P. 985 ] and Grigsby v. … The Supreme Court acknowledged this change in Hartzell v.

Stevens v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

241 Cal. App. 4th 1074 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 28, 2015

(See Lyng v. Payne (1986) 476 U.S. 926, 942; Walters v. … Hersh, Counsel 28 Counsel for Amicus Curiae Haight Brown & Bonesteel LLP, Theodore A.

Brown v. North Ventura Road Development Co.

216 Cal. App. 2d 227 · California Court of Appeal · May 15, 1963

Brown, in the sum of Twenty Thousand ($20,000.00) Dollars, .... 9. … Brown, in the sum of Five Thousand ($5,000.00) Dollars. ... 10. That plaintiff, Oran W.

Gray v. State Personnel Board

166 Cal. App. 3d 1229 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 25, 1985

(Blake v. State Personnel Board (1972) 25 Cal.App.3d 541, 550 [ 102 Cal.Rptr. 50 ].) … In Ackerman v.

Banks v. Board of Pharmacy

161 Cal. App. 3d 708 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 8, 1984

(Owens v. City of Signal Hill (1984) 154 Cal.App.3d 123, 128 [ 201 Cal.Rptr. 70 ].) … (Froid v. Fox (1982) 132 Cal.App.3d 832, 837 [ 183 Cal.Rptr. 461 ].) It is not, however, inevitably true.

Brown v. Beach House Design & Development

California Court of Appeal · Nov 21, 2022

(E.g., Toland v. … (See, e.g., Browne v. Turner Construction Co. (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 1334, 1345.)

Shellenberger v. Board of Equalization

147 Cal. App. 3d 510 · California Court of Appeal · Sep 28, 1983

Dist. v. State Bd. of Equalization, supra, 22 Cal.3d at p. 245 ; State of South Dakota v. Brown (1978) 20 Cal.3d 765, 777 [ 144 Cal.Rptr. 758 , 576 P.2d 473 ]; Bakkenson v. … (Board of Supervisors v. Lonergan, supra, 27 Cal.3d at p. 866 ; State Bd. of Equalization v. Board of Supervisors (1980) 105 Cal.App.3d 813, 822 [ 164 Cal.Rptr. 739 ].)

Aughenbaugh v. Board of Supervisors

139 Cal. App. 3d 83 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 12, 1983

(Shouse v. Quinley (1935) 3 Cal.2d 357, 360 [ 45 P.2d 701 ]; Hershey v. Cole (1933) 130 Cal.App. 683, 688 [ 20 P.2d 972 ]; Louisiana ex rel. Hubert v. … As stated in City of Venice v.

Schatz v. Franchise Tax Board

81 Cal. Rptr. 2d 719 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 26, 1999

(In re Black (10th Cir. 1986) 787 F.2d 503, 505 ; but see Grogan v. Garner (1991) 498 U.S. 279, 283, 286-287 [ 111 S.Ct. 654, 657, 659-660 , 112 L.Ed.2d 755, 762, 764-765 ].) … (Former § 19049, [formerly § 18597]; see King, supra, 961 F.2d at p. 1425 , for a summary of the former statutory scheme cited above; see also Dupuy v.

Wilson v. State Personnel Board

39 Cal. App. 3d 218 · California Court of Appeal · May 17, 1974

The State Personnel Board and the Director of the Department of Human Resources Development have appealed from a judgment directing issuance of a writ of mandate to vacate an order of the board which dismissed respondent … (Blake v. State Personnel Bd., supra, 25 Cal.App.3d 541, 553 .)

Coelho v. State Personnel Board

209 Cal. App. 3d 968 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 23, 1989

{Griffith v. Department of Public Works (1956) 141 Cal.App.2d 376, 381 [ 296 P.2d 838 ].) … If the evidence was insufficient to justify disciplinary sanctions against Coelho, the Board had a legal duty to revoke the adverse action. 2 (See, e.g., City of Torrance v.

Atherton v. Board of Supervisors

176 Cal. App. 3d 433 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 6, 1986

(Atherton v. Board of Supervisors (1983) 146 Cal.App.3d 346 [ 194 Cal.Rptr. 203 ].) … (Cox v. United States Dept, of Justice (D.C.Cir. 1979) 601 F.2d 1 ; Marschner v. Dept, of State (D.Conn. 1979) 470 F.Supp. 196 .) Disapproving the reasoning of these cases, the court in Barrett v.

Cleeves v. Board of Education

22 Cal. App. 2d 183 · California Court of Appeal · Jul 26, 1937

(Abraham v. Sims, 2 Cal. (2d) 698 [ 42 Pac. (2d) 1029 ] ; Mitchell v. Board of Trustees, 5 Cal. App. (2d) 64 [42 Pac. (2d) 397] ; Fidler v. Board of Trustees, 112 Cal. App. 296 [ 296 Pac. 912 ].) … Counsel for petitioner refer to the action of the board, after the reduction in his salary, in retaining certain probationary employees and allowing their status to become permanent and cite the case of Lotts v.

Wylie v. State Personnel Board

93 Cal. App. 2d 838 · California Court of Appeal · Oct 3, 1949

(Stockton v. Department of Employment, 25 Cal.2d 264 [ 153 P.2d 741 ]; Ahlstedt v. Board of *842 Education, 79 Cal.App.2d 845 [ 180 P.2d 949 ].) This was the so-called common law rule of California. (Ward v. … Marshall, 96 Cal. 155 [ 30 P. 1113 , 31 Am.St.Rep. 198 ]; Pennycook v. Boyle, 26 Cal.App. 301 [ 146 P. 895 ]; O’Neill v. Williams, 53 Cal.App. 1 [ 199 P. 870 ].)

Borchers v. Franchise Tax Board

151 Cal. App. 3d 504 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 31, 1984

The Court of Appeal in South Coast Co. v. … Our view is buttressed by a line of decisions of the State Board of Equalization. Contemporary administrative constructions of statutes are entitled to great weight. (Select Base Materials v.

Stimpel v. State Personnel Board

6 Cal. App. 3d 206 · California Court of Appeal · Mar 31, 1970

to the board as to the cause of his absence and his failure to obtain leave therefor, and the board finds that he is ready, able, and willing to resume the discharge of the duties of his position.” … In Sherbert v. Verner (1963) 374 U.S. 398 [ 10 L.Ed.2d 965 , 83 S.Ct. 1790 ] a Seventh Day Adventist was denied unemployment compensation benefits by South Carolina because she was unavailable for work on Saturdays.

Matthews v. Board of Supervisors

203 Cal. App. 2d 800 · California Court of Appeal · May 21, 1962

The questioned constitutionality of a similar ordinance was thoroughly discussed in Tustin Heights Assn. v. Board of Supervisors, supra, at pages 633, 634 and 635. … J., Brown, J., concurred.

Alexander v. State Personnel Board

95 Cal. Rptr. 2d 324 · California Court of Appeal · Apr 28, 2000

(Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 181-183 [ 172 Cal.Rptr. 487 , 624 P.2d 1215 ], fn. omitted (Brown).) … (Pinion v. State Personnel Board (1938) 29 Cal.App.2d 314, 319-320 [ 84 P.2d 185 ]; Allen v. State Board of Equalization (1941) 43 Cal.App.2d 90 [ 110 P.2d 73 ].)

Duncan v. WORKERS'COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD

179 Cal. App. 4th 1009 · California Court of Appeal · Nov 25, 2009

DUNCAN, as Administrator, etc., Petitioner, v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and X.S., Respondents. No. H034040. Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District. November 25, 2009. *1015 Vanessa L. … Accordingly, we annul the decision of the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board.