Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
955 results
1.93s
California Attorney General Opinion 23-201
California Attorney General Reports · Jun 26, 2024
Rojas (2023) 15 Cal.5th 561, 568; People v. Curiel (2023) 15 Cal.5th 433, 461; People v. Valencia (2017) 3 Cal.5th 347, 360. 34 People v. Snook (1997) 16 Cal.4th 1210, 1215; see Lungren v. … Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d 432, 443 (“It is a well-settled principle of statutory construction that the word ‘may’ is ordinarily construed as permissive, whereas ‘shall’ is ordinarily construed as mandatory . .
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Sep 8, 2022
Code Regs., tit. 15, § 2449.4 [Board of Parole Hearings].) The term is also commonly used in connection with local summary criminal history information (see Pen. … Assn. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Sep 12, 1996
In Michael v. … (See Board of Trustees v. Leach (1968) 258 Cal.App.2d 281, 287.) Such is no longer the case.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Sep 8, 2022
Code Regs., tit. 15, § 2449.4 [Board of Parole Hearings].) The term is also commonly used in connection with local summary criminal history information (see Pen. … Assn. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Jan 9, 2009
BROWN JR. Attorney General CONSTANCE L. LeLOUIS Supervising Deputy Attorney General DANIEL G. STONE Deputy Attorney General THE HONORABLE S. … See People v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Opinion 21-1001
107 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 32 · California Attorney General Reports · Mar 20, 2024
Deukmejian v. … George Deukmejian v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Aug 24, 2023
Brown-Dempsey (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 421, 434-436. 41 Sen. Assem. Com. on Public Safety Analysis, Rep. on Sen. Bill No. 416 (2005-2006 Reg. Sess.), as amended March 29, 2005, p. 1, italics added; see Mt. Hawley Ins. … Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Jun 19, 1986
(See Cook v. … Board etc. of Cal. (1938) 26 Cal.App.2d 183, 185; Note, The California Public Records Act: The Public's Right of Access to Governmental Information (1976) 7 Pacific L.J. 105, 121-125; see also American Civil Liberties Union
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Sep 29, 2022
Code, §§ 11164-11174.3; see Dwight R. v. Christy B. (2013) 212 Cal.App.4th 697, 707; Castillo v. County of Los Angeles (C.D. Cal. 2013) 959 F.Supp.2d 1255, 1260. 3 Stecks v. … (a); Dwight R. v. Christy B., supra, 212 Cal.App.4th at p. 708; Arce v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Dec 1, 1987
(Brown v. Ferdon (1936) 5 Cal.2d 226, 230.) … V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Sep 29, 2022
Code, §§ 11164-11174.3; see Dwight R. v. Christy B. (2013) 212 Cal.App.4th 697, 707; Castillo v. County of Los Angeles (C.D. Cal. 2013) 959 F.Supp.2d 1255, 1260. 3 Stecks v. … (a); Dwight R. v. Christy B., supra, 212 Cal.App.4th at p. 708; Arce v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Dec 1, 1988
(See Marin County Board of Realtors v. Palsson (1976) 16 Cal.3d 920, 925.) Under both California and federal law, agreements fixing or tampering with prices are illegal "per se." … In People v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Jul 28, 1987
The principal rules were summarized in Moyer v. Workmen's Comp. … People v. Knowles, (1950) 35 Cal 2d 175, 182.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Sep 14, 1989
(See, Danville Fire Protection Dist. v. Duffel Financial & Constr. Co, supra, 58 Cal.App.3d 245; People v. Wheeler, supra, 30 Cal.App.3d 282; Baum Electric Co. v. … When they do so, the District's board is "deemed a legislative body and the district . . . deemed a local agency." (§ 13869.) 11.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Feb 9, 1994
U.S. v. American Tel. & Tel. Co., 552 F.Supp. 131 (D.D.C. 1982), aff'd. sub nom Maryland v. United States, 460 U.S. 1001 (1983). 4. … See U.S. v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna