Case law

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Sep 16, 1996

(See United States v. La Salle National Bank (1978) 437 U.S. 298; See v. City of Seattle (1967) 387 U.S. 541; Reisman v. Caplin (1964) 375 U.S. 440; Parris v. Zolin (1996) 12 Cal.4th 839; People v. … Molino (1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 46; Board of Medical Quality Assurance v. Gheradini (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 669; Fielder v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 15, 1993

(Burden v. Snowden (1992) 2 Cal.4th 556, 562.) … (Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing Com. (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1379, 1387.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 29, 1996

(See West v. State of California (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 753, 760; State of California v. Superior Court (1984) 150 Cal.App.3d 848, 855; Camp v. Board of Supervisors (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 334, 348.) … (See McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm'n (1995) ___ U.S. ___, 115 S.Ct. 1511, 1516-1517, 131 L.Ed.2d 426; Zablocki v. Redhail (1978) 434 U.S. 374, 388; California Transport v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 22, 2022

Pennington v. City of Richmond (1956) 141 Cal.App.2d 107, 117. 8 International Assn. of Fire Fighters v. … these reasons, the application for leave to sue in quo warranto is GRANTED. 22 105 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 65, 68 (2022) (granting leave to sue in quo warranto to challenge the appointment of a member of the Orange County Board

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 31, 1988

Code, § 19959; Marsh v. … (See Martin v. City of Los Angeles, supra, 162 Cal.App.3d 559, 563-565; Deukmejian v. CHE, Inc., supra, 150 Cal.App.3d 123, 135; Marsh v. Edwards Theatres Circuit, Inc., supra, 64 Cal.App.3d 881, 886-888; People v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · May 27, 1987

(See Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown (1981) 29 Cal.3d 168, 180; City and County of San Francisco v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (1978) 22 Cal.3d 103, 113; Methodist Hosp. of Sacramento v. … (People v. Black (32 Cal.3d 1, 5; accord People v. Craft (1986) 41 Cal.3d 554, 560.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Sep 30, 1998

In Schaefer v. … (Cf., Neigel v. Superior Court (1977) 72 Cal.App.3d 373, 378; People v. Finkelstin (1950) 98 Cal.App.2d 545, 557-558; 10 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 34, 35 (1947).)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 21, 1990

Heller Western, Inc. v. … Eng'rs, Inc. v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 30, 1993

In Biakanja v. … (Fletcher v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 13, 1999

On November 22, 1995, defendant was elected to a four-year term as a member of the board of directors of the District. … Code, § 22.2; Matt v. Horstmann (1950) 36 Cal.2d 388, 391-392; People ex rel. Chapman v. Rapsey (1940) 16 Cal.2d 636, 640-644; Eldridge v. Sierra View Local Hospital Dist. (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 311, 319.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 8, 1993

(Napa Valley Educators' Assn. v. Napa Valley Unified School Dist. (1987) 194 Cal.App.3d 243, 251.) In Meyer v. … Again in Ventura v.

Opinion No. (1999)

California Attorney General Reports · May 28, 1999

(See Coffee v. Superior Court (1905) 147 Cal. 525 , 530 ; Los Angeles Free Press, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1970) 9 Cal.App.3d 448 , 457 ; Pitchess v. … (See Johnson v. State of California (1968) 69 Cal.2d 782 , 793-797 ; Gates v. Superior Court (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 481 , 503 , 506-507 ; Newton v. County of Napa (1990) 217 Cal.App.3d 1551 , 1560 ; Constance B. v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 21, 1992

Recently in Crown Motors v. … (Sunset Amusement Co. v. Board of Police Commissioners (1972) 7 Cal.3d 64, 72; Cal. Const., art. XI, § 7.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · May 18, 1995

(Benny v. City of Alameda (1980) 105 Cal.App.3d 1006, 1010.) … Board of Supervisors (1977) 66 Cal.App.3d 191, 194).

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Nov 17, 1998

(See Paramount Convalescent Center, Inc. v. Department of Health Care Services (1975) 15 Cal.3d 489, 494-497; In re Christensen (1890) 85 Cal. 208, 214.) … (Baughman v. Medical Board of California (1995) 40 Cal.App.4th 398, 402; Evans v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1994) 21 Cal.App.4th 958, 967.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 1, 1987

(Blank v. … State Board of Optometry, supra, 139 Cal.App.2d 78, 91, held: 'An excessive charge [to the patient] is not an element of the offense.' (Italics added.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 26, 1989

(Kesler v. … (People v. Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512, 530.) Until a new technique has appellate endorsement the reliability of the technique must be proved by the testimony of qualified experts. (People v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 13, 1987

In Lagiss v. … Board of Park Commrs. (1936) 13 Cal.App.2d 625, 635.) The primary application of this theory has been where the Legislature has 'imposed' an obligation upon local governments by statute.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 20, 1994

Hurley (1975) 421 U.S. 338; Townsend v. Swank (1971) 404 U.S. 282; Lewis v. Martin (1970) 397 U.S. 552; Rosado v. Wyman (1970) 397 U.S. 397; King v. … (Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. Superior Court (1976) 16 Cal.3d 392, 419.)" 1.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 24, 1991

WEISKOPF : Deputy Attorney General : : ______________________________________________________________________________ THE FRANCHISE TAX BOARD has … (See Cooley v.