Case law

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · May 13, 1992

In People v. … Lundin v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 9, 1992

A district is governed by a board of three or five directors. (Gov. Code, §§ 61200, 61300.) … (See, e.g., City of Campbell v. Mosk (1961) 197 Cal.App.2d 640, 648-649; 36 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 317, 320 (1960).)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jan 13, 1995

(Walnut Creek Manor v. Fair Employment & Housing Com. (1991) 54 Cal.3d 245, 268.) "[W]hen a special and general statute are in conflict, the former controls." (Agricultural Labor Relations Board v. … (See California Equalization Board v. Sierra Summit (1989) 490 U.S. 844, 848-849; South Carolina v. Baker (1988) 485 U.S. 505, 515-527.) In United States v.

Opinion No. (2005)

California Attorney General Reports · Feb 8, 2006

In Bryan v. … "(e) A motorized scooter operated on public streets shall at all times be equipped with an engine that complies with the applicable State Air Resources Board emission requirements."

Opinion No. (2004)

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 22, 2004

Franchise Tax Bd. v. … Superior Court (1985) 164 Cal.App.3d 526 , 537 , fn. 5 [Franchise Tax Board's independent statutory authority to investigate and issue subpoenas "is substantially identical" to authority granted under sections 11180-11191

Opinion No. (1998)

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 29, 1998

(See Long Beach Police Officers Assn . v. City of Long Beach (1976) 61 Cal.App.3d 364 , 373-374 ; People v. Piorkowski (1974) 41 Cal.App.3d 324 , 327-330 ; People v. … (See Safer v. Superior Court (1975) 15 Cal.3d 230 , 237-238 ; State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co . v. Department of Motor Vehicles (1997) 53 Cal.App.4th 1076 , 1082 ; Board of Trustees v.

Opinion No. (2003)

California Attorney General Reports · Sep 4, 2003

Board of Supervisors (1977) 69 Cal.App.3d 228 , 241-242 .) Section 26602 states: "The sheriff shall . . . investigate public offenses which have been committed." Police officers have similar powers. (§ 41601 .) … In Moran v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 5, 1995

(See Samuels v. Hite (1950) 35 Cal.2d 115, 116; Younger v. Board of Supervisors (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 864, 872; 28 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 127, 129 (1956).) … Term Limits, Inc. v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Feb 26, 1991

(State Board of Education v. Levit (1959) 52 Cal.2d 441, 462; Mosk v. Superior Court (1979) 25 Cal.3d 474, 495.) … In 1869, in People v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 20, 1994

(Moore v. California State Board of Accountancy (1992) 2 Cal.4th 999, 1012.) "In determining intent, we look first to the language of the statute, giving effect to its `plain meaning.'" (Kimmel v. … (a); Smith v. County of Los Angeles (1989) 211 Cal.App.3d 188, 197).

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 1, 1994

(Lusardi Construction Co. v. … Brailsford v. Blue (1962) 57 Cal.2d 335, 338; Immel v. Langley (1959) 52 Cal.2d 104, 106; Donnellan v. Hite (1956) 139 Cal.App.2d 43, 46.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Sep 15, 1988

Section 51350, for example, states in part: "A county which provides services through its appropriate departments, boards, commissions, officers or employees, to any city pursuant to contract or as … particular service, either as a direct or an indirect overhead charge, any portion of those costs which are attributable to services made available to all portions of the county, as determined by resolution of the board

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 25, 1995

(Moore v. Panish (1982) 32 Cal.3d 535, 544; Stout v. Democratic County Central Com. (1952) 40 Cal.2d 91, 94; Azevedo v. Jordan (1965) 237 Cal.App.2d 521, 528.) … (Smith v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 30, 1987

(Valdez v. Federal Mut. Ins. Co. (1969) 272 Cal.App.2d 223, 227.) … (People v. Carskaddon (1957) 49 Cal.2d 423, 427; and see People v. Bradley (1983) 146 Cal.App.3d 721, 725; 20 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 16, 17 (1952).)

Opinion No. (1997)

California Attorney General Reports · Jan 24, 1997

In Nielsen v. … In Keely v. State Personnel Board (1975) 53 Cal.App.3d 88 , the court upheld the discharge of a state prison guard for owning a liquor store.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 18, 1998

(Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Orange County Employees Retirement System (1993) 6 Cal.4th 821, 826.) The words are to be given "their usual and ordinary meaning." (DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 593, 601.) … (O'Brien v. Dudenhoeffer (1993) 16 Cal.App.4th 327, 334; see People v. Cruz (1996) 13 Cal.4th 764, 773- 774, fn. 5.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 4, 1991

In Schaefer v. … As noted in Neigel v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 5, 1990

ANALYSIS The board of supervisors of a county has established an equal employment opportunity grievance procedure for county employees. … (See City of Fresno v. Superior Court, supra, 205 Cal.App.3d 1459, 1472; City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal Court, supra, 202 Cal.App.3d 371, 378-381; City of Redding v.

Opinion No. (1999)

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 6, 1999

In Board of Supervisors v. Local Agency Formation Com. (1992) 3 Cal.4th 903 , 912 , the court observed: ". . . … In Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 31, 1996

Iowa Utilities Board v. Federal Communications Commission, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS (8th Cir. 1996). 35 Harris Rept., supra, at 25. … Indus., 104 F.T.C. 852 (1984). 118 Republic of Texas Corp. v. Board of Governors of the Fed.