Case law

Opinion No.

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 24, 2011

Code § 11180 ; Younger v. … Proc. § 1858 . 22 Gikas v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 28, 1999

subdivision, a person with a disability shall be considered an employee when performing productive work. “(4) Provide in its articles of incorporation that at least two of the directors of its board … Directors who are also employees of the nonprofit corporation shall not participate in or be present at discussions of the board of directors concerned with labor-management contract negotiations.

Opinion No. (2005)

California Attorney General Reports · May 10, 2005

As explained in Noble v. … (People v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 24, 1989

(Cf., Planned Parenthood Affiliates v. Van de Kamp, supra, 181 Cal.App.3d 245, 267; Select Base Materials v. Board of Equalization (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645.) … (People v. Stockton Pregnancy Control Medical Clinic, Inc. (1988) 203 Cal.App.3d 225, 235; Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board (1973) 10 Cal.3d 222, 230; Rich v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 3, 1989

In Fitts v. … (People v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 27, 1993

Younger v. … Younger v.

Opinion No. (2005)

California Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 2005

Governing Board of Rialto Unified School Dist. (1997) 14 Cal.4th 627 , 646 .) … Code, § 3534 ["Particular expressions qualify those which are general"]; Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIV (1991) 52 Cal.3d 1142 , 1159-1160 ; Lawrence v.

Opinion No. (2003)

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 21, 2003

State Personnel Board (1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 572 , 579 ), which is commonly defined as "[a] form of cannabis that consists largely of resin from the flowering tops and sprouts of cultivated female plants" (Stedman's Medical … (People v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 15, 1995

(Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing Com. (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1379, 1387.) … (Webster v. Superior Court (1988) 46 Cal.3d 338, 343.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 20, 1996

(Wildlife Alive v. Chickering (1976) 18 Cal.3d 190, 196; Safer v. Superior Court (1975) 15 Cal.3d 230, 236-238; 76 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 126, 129-130 (1993); 71 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 266, 274 (1988).) … (People v. Zamora (1980) 28 Cal.3d 88, 98; Wildlife Alive v. Chickering, supra, 18 Cal.3d at 196; 76 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 86, 89 (1993); 71 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen., supra, at 274.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · May 4, 1993

(See People v. Stafford Packing Co. (1924) 193 Cal. 719, 730; People v. Marine Products Co. (1947) 77 Cal.App.2d Supp. 929, 934.) … (People v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 20, 1997

Co. v. … In County of Alameda v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Sep 15, 1993

In Beck v. … (Mason v. Hosta (1984) 152 Cal.App.3d 980, 986, emphasis added.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 20, 1996

(See City of Ladue v. Gilleo (1994) 512 U.S. ___ [129 L.Ed.2d 36]; Boos v. Barry (1988) 485 U.S. 312; Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San Diego (1981) 453 U.S. 490; Whitton v. … Brown (1978) 20 Cal.3d 765, 774.) 6 Whether political campaign signs would constitute "advertising" subject to the Act's requirements is beyond the scope of this opinion.

California Attorney General Opinion 23-1001

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 3, 2025

Ottinger, supra, 115 Cal. at p. 456. 86 Id. at p. 458. 87 Ibid. 88 Id. at pp. 458-459. 89 Ibid.; see also, e.g., Brown v. … McKittrick v. Globe-Democrat Pub. Co. (1937) 341 Mo. 862, 875 (“Whether the chance factor is dominant or subordinate is often a troublesome question”). 171 See post, fn. 184; see, e.g., Brown v.

Opinion No. (2003)

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 18, 2003

(People v. … (Board of Medical Quality Assurance v. Gherardini (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 669 , 679-680 ; see Carlson v.

Opinion No. (2006)

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 12, 2006

As we observed in Lybarger [ v. … (See People v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 6, 1992

In Portola Hills Community Assn. v. … (Sunrise Country Club v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 8, 1991

City of Los Angeles (1951) 37 Cal.2d 718; Martin v. County of Contra Costa (1970) 8 Cal.App.3d 856; Gutierrez v. … Indeed, the funding of trial courts has been significantly altered by the recent enactment of the Brown-Presley Trial Court Funding Act, providing a block grant state funding program. (Gov. Code, § 77000, et seq.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 6, 1994

Code, §§ 1801, 6510-6511.)1 An action in quo warranto is maintained "in the interest of the public . . . ." (67 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 151, 153 (1984); see City of Campbell v. … Section 6011 provides: "The board of each corporation which desires to merge shall approve an agreement of merger.