Case law

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 7, 1988

State Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 531, 538- 539.) … Board of Permit Appeals (1975) 44 Cal.App.3d 525, 544-545, fn. 15, and cases cited.)" Edwards was followed in People v.

Opinion No. (2001)

California Attorney General Reports · Jan 9, 2001

(People v. DeLaCruz (1993) 20 Cal.App.4th 955 , 963 .) … (Woods v. Young (1991) 53 Cal.3d 315 , 325 ; accord, San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1992) 2 Cal.4th 571 , 577 .)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 21, 1988

(Stillwell v. State Bar (1946) 29 Cal.2d 119, 123; Diachenko v. State of California (1981) 123 Cal.App.3d 932, 938.) … (American Friends Service Com. v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 8, 1991

(Hicks v. Board of Supervisors (1977) 69 Cal.App.3d 228, 241.) … (See also Hicks v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 69 Cal.App.3d at 241.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · May 10, 1995

Code, '' 19952-19954, '' 19995-19999; see generally City and County of San Francisco v. Grant Co. (1986) 181 Cal.App.3d 1085; People Ex Rel. Deukmejian v. CHE, Inc. (1983) 150 Cal.App.3d 123; Marsh v. … (See Norman v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd. (1983) 34 Cal.3d 1, 8; In Re Kelly (1983) 33 Cal.3d 267, 277; Adamson v. Department of Social Services (1988) 207 Cal.App.3d 14, 22.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 14, 1993

(See Ferdig v. State Personnel Board (1969) 71 Cal.2d 96, 103-104 ["Administrative agencies have only the power conferred on them by statute and an act in excess of those powers is void"].) … V, § 13; D'Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1, 14-15; People ex rel. Lynch v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · May 7, 1991

(Younger v. Board of Supervisors (1979) 93 Cal.App.3d 864, 870.) However, where necessary, the Legislature is empowered to deal with regional problems on a regional basis. In People ex rel.Younger v. … Companies (1988) 46 Cal.3d 287, 300; see Knighten v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · May 19, 1987

(Butler v. Compton Junior College Dist., supra; cf. Turlock Irr. Dist. v. White, supra, at 190.) … City & Co. of S.F. (1952) 112 Cal.App.2d 719, 731; Rick v. State Board of Optometry (1965) 235 Cal.App.2d 591, 607), as it is to be inferred that they were intentionally excluded by the specific enumeration.

Opinion No. (2009)

California Attorney General Reports · Sep 24, 2009

BROWN JR. Attorney General TAYLOR S. … Palmer v. Super. Ct. , 103 Cal.

Opinion No. (1999)

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 28, 1999

For the purposes of this subdivision, a person with a disability shall be considered an employee when performing productive work. "(4) Provide in its articles of incorporation that at least two of the directors of its board … Directors who are also employees of the nonprofit corporation shall not participate in or be present at discussions of the board of directors concerned with labor-management contract negotiations. "(5) Provide for disabled

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 4, 1991

See, Fowler v. Smith (1852) 2 Cal. 568; American Canyon Fire Prot. Dist. v. County of Napa (1983) 141 Cal.App.3d 100, 104-106; 67 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 369, 379 (1984); 66 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 293, 295 (1983). … (See, Ford Motor Co. v. County of Tulare (1983) 145 Cal.App.3d 691.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 22, 1999

In contrast, section 667.7 provides an “indeterminate” prison sentence of “life” with the Board of Prison Terms exercising discretion in determining when to grant parole. … While the statements in these cases may be considered dicta (see Trope v. Katz (1995) 11 Cal.4th 274, 275; Kyle v. Carmon (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 901, 912, fn.10; Hubbard v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Feb 4, 1992

In The City of Oakland v. … "(b) Two or more local public entities having the same governing board may be coinsured under a master policy and the total premium may be prorated among those entities.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · May 27, 1987

In Mosk v. … (See State Personnel Bd. v. Fair Employment & Housing Com. (1985) 39 Cal.3d 422, 437-441; Pacific Legal Foundation v. Brown, supra, 29 Cal.3d 168, 193-199.) Here we find no impermissible conflict.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1994

(Byers v. Board of Supervisors (1968) 262 Cal.App.2d 148, 153; 65 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 176, 177 (1982); 57 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 423, 424-425 (1974).) … In City of Santa Barbara v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 9, 1991

(Thornburg v. … In Garza v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 1998

(Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 570.) … (Lesher Communications, Inc. v. City of Walnut Creek, supra, 52 Cal.3d at 541.) In Roney v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · May 19, 2022

Williams, supra, 107 Cal.App. at p. 342; see also State Dept. of Public Health v. Superior Court (2015) 60 Cal.4th 940, 960 (more specific provision controls over more general); People v. … Vanvleck (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 355, 365 (same); Department of Veterans Affairs v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 8, 1986

(California Correctional Officers' Assn. v. Board of Administration (1978) 76 Cal.App.3d 786, 794; 67 Ops.Cal. Atty.Gen. 519, 522 (1984).) … Dist. v. Rodriguez (1973) 411 U.S. 1, 28; Massachusetts Board of Ret. v. Murgia (1976) 427 U.S. 307, 313; Sail'er Inn Inc. v. Kirby (1971) 5 Cal.3d 1, 18) or of a "fundamental right" (cf. San Antonio Ind. Sch. Dist. v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 5, 1997

Such activity constitutes the practice of law even if conducted before an administrative board or commission. (Baron v. City of Los Angeles, supra, 2 Cal.3d at 543.) … (Welfare Rights Org. v. Crisan (1993) 33 Cal.3d 766, 770 [welfare hearings]; Consumers Lobby Against Monopolies v. Pub. Util. Com., supra, 25 Cal.3d at 913-914 [PUC hearings]; Staley v.