Case law

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 5, 1998

(Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d 432, 463; In re Richard E. (1978) 21 Cal.3d 349, 354; 80 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 155, 157 (1997).) … (Rich v. State Board of Optometry (1965) 235 Cal.App.3d 591, 607; accord, Silva v. Superior Court (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 562, 570; see also California Mfrs. Assn. v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 15, 1999

(See Walters v. Weed (1988) 45 Cal.3d 1, 7; Smith v. Smith (1955) 45 Cal.2d 235, 239; DeMiglio v. Mashore (1992) 4 Cal.App.4th 1260, 1268; Fenton v. … Our analysis relied primarily on the case of Klose v. Superior Court (1950) 96 Cal.App.2d 913.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Oct 21, 1987

period and under such conditions as the board may determine. … (Geftakys v. State Personnel Board (1982) 138 Cal.App.3d 844, 859.) 5 This conclusion applies as well to contractors for charter as well as general law counties. (64 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 234, 237-238 (1981).)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 18, 2022

Proc., § 803; Nicolopulos v. City of Lawndale (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 1221, 1225; People ex rel. Pennington v. City of Richmond (1956) 141 Cal.App.2d 107, 117. 4 International Assn. of Fire Fighters v. … IV, § 403(c). 9 Ibid. 10 People v. Standish (2006) 38 Cal.4th 858, 869. 11 See People ex rel. Jacobs v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 7, 1990

See Brown v. Davis (N.J. Superior Ct., 1984) 495 A.2d 900; Kugler v. Ryan (Mo. App., 1984) 682 S.W.2d 47; Bering v. Share (Wash., 1986) 721 P.2d 918; Crozer Chester Medical Center v. May (Pa. … Like the courts in New Jersey (see Brown v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jun 30, 1998

(DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc. (1992) 2 Cal.4th 593, 601.) … In Lungren v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 10, 1991

ROCHE : Deputy Attorney General : : ______________________________________________________________________________ THE STATE BOARD OF CORRECTIONS … Code, § 29602; County of Sonoma v. Santa Rosa (1894) 102 Cal 426; Washington Township Hosp. Dist. v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jan 18, 1990

(D'Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners (1974) 11 Cal.3d 1, 17.) … (D'Amico v. Board of Medical Examiners, supra, at p. 17; emphases by the court.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · May 2, 1995

Relator challenges the City's appointment by its Board of Water and Power ("Board") of William McCarley ("Defendant"), who is not a registered engineer, as the general manager and chief engineer of the Department. … Superior Court (1991) 53 Cal.3d 442, 460; Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing Com. (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1379, 1388-1389; Board of Supervisors v. Lonergan (1980) 27 Cal.3d 855, 866; Industrial Indemnity Co. v.

Opinion No. (1999)

California Attorney General Reports · Dec 22, 1999

In contrast, section 667.7 provides an "indeterminate" prison sentence of "life" with the Board of Prison Terms exercising discretion in determining when to grant parole. … While the statements in these cases may be considered dicta (see Trope v. Katz (1995) 11 Cal.4th 274 , 275 ; Kyle v. Carmon (1999) 71 Cal.App.4th 901 , 912 , fn. 10; Hubbard v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1989

(People v. Woodhead (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1002, 1010.) … (See Parrott v. Rogers (1980) 103 Cal.App.3d 377, 383.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Apr 30, 1986

Assn. v. Public Utilities Com. (1979) 24 Cal.3d 836, 844; Fields v. … (Kaiser Steel Corp. v. State Board of Equalization (1979) 24 Cal.3d 188, 192.)

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · May 25, 2023

Davis v. … Appeals Bd., supra, 30 Cal.3d at pp. 339-340 (Legislature violated separation of powers by authorizing the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board to discipline attorneys practicing before the Board with only a limited avenue

Opinion No. (2000)

California Attorney General Reports · Jan 27, 2000

(People v. McCaskey (1985) 170 Cal.App.3d 411 , 416 ; accord, People v. Jenkins (1995) 35 Cal.App.4th 669 , 673-674 .) … (See Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. Guardino (1995) 11 Cal.4th 220 , 238-242 ; Rossi v. Brown (1995) 9 Cal.4th 688 , 697-698 ; Referendum Committee v.

Opinion No. (1997)

California Attorney General Reports · Aug 5, 1997

Thus, in an application to the Workers' Compensation Appeals Board for compensation benefits, "[e]ither party may be present at any hearing, in person, by attorney, or by any other agent. . . ." (Lab. … Such activity constitutes the practice of law even if conducted before an administrative board or commission. ( Baron v. City of Los Angeles , supra , 2 Cal.3d at 543 .)

Opinion No. (2005)

California Attorney General Reports · Feb 7, 2005

(Carman v. Alvord (1982) 31 Cal.3d 318 , 325 .) … (Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. v. County of Orange, supra, 110 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1382-1383 ; Valentine v. City of Oakland, supra, 148 Cal.App.3d at p. 149 .) As the Supreme Court stated in Carman v.

Opinion No. (1998)

California Attorney General Reports · Feb 13, 1998

Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553 , 570 .) … In Roney v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · May 11, 1999

(Harris v. … (Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing Com. (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1379, 1387; accord, Long Beach Police Officers Assn. v. City of Long Beach (1988) 46 Cal.3d 736, 743; Sand v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Mar 14, 1986

(Yellin v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance (1985) 174 Cal.App.3d 1040, 1058-1059; Gore v. … Rather that is a determination for the Board of Dental Examiners to make upon expert testimony as to such. (Gore v. Board of Medical Quality Assurance, supra, 110 Cal.App.3d at 196; Thole v.

Untitled California Attorney General Opinion

California Attorney General Reports · Jul 15, 1992

(See Irwin v. County of Yuba (1898) 119 Cal. 686, 690; L.A. Whse. Co. v. Los Angeles (1934) 139 Cal.App. 368, 371; compare 53 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 113 (1970) and 2 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 69 (1943).) … However, if the county board of supervisors has exercised it option pursuant to subdivision (c) to assess an additional penalty, a different conclusion is reached.