Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
955 results
1.57s
Untitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · May 20, 1996
This is so since to give the board of supervisors confirmation or veto power of the court's candidate would in effect make the board the joint appointing power. (Cf. Wetherbee v. … (See Anderson v. Superior Court (1995) 11 Cal.4th 1152, 1166; People v. Davenport (1985) 41 Cal.3d 247, 264; Carlos v. Superior Court (1983) 35 Cal.3d 131, 147-148; Rowe v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Mar 20, 1997
In Buckley v. … Buckley v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Jun 24, 1987
The Question of Sanctions Under the decision of Mazzola v. … Davis' representation of Graham while on the county board appears to be an isolated incident rather than a persistent practice. Sparks v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Aug 23, 1990
(See generally CBS, Inc. v. … While the burden is upon the Board to justify withholding the plans and specifications (see CBS, Inc. v. Block, supra, 42 Cal.3d 646, 652; New York Times Co. v. Superior Court, supra, 218 Cal.App.3d 1579, 1584; Braun v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Mar 3, 2000
(Campagna v. City of Sanger (1996) 42 Cal.App.4th 533 , 538 ; Millbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of Millbrae (1968) 262 Cal.App.2d 222 , 236-237 ; see also Stigall v. … However, the commissioner's spouse is compensated as the city's representative on the governing board of the joint powers agency.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · May 23, 1997
the board members' current terms. … Cory , supra , 27 Cal.3d at 540 ; Betts v. Board of Administration , supra , 21 Cal.3d at 866 ; 70 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen., supra , 218.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Aug 28, 1990
In Genser v. … Chapman v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Mar 23, 1993
In Schaefer v. … As indicated in Schaefer v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Dec 7, 1988
(Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247, 256; Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El Segundo (1977) 19 Cal.3d 152, 163; Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645.) … (Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 8 Cal.3d 247, 256; Great Lakes Properties, Inc. v. City of El Segundo, supra, 19 Cal.3d 152, 163; Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal., supra, 51 Cal.2d 640, 645.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Dec 23, 1997
In Hill v. … (See Public Employees Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1985) 167 Cal.App.3d 797, 806-807.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Aug 18, 1998
(Mazzola v. City and County of San Francisco (1980) 112 Cal.App.3d 141.) … (Housing Authority v. City of L.A. (1982) 38 Cal.2d 853, 862.) The board of supervisors is a separate body and has no role to play in the commissioners' hiring decisions. (§ 34278.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Jul 11, 2001
At the end of the transition period implementing the new programs, the Library of California Board ("Board") will "file a written notice with the Secretary of the Senate and the Chief Clerk of the Assembly notifying the Legislature … A special library is defined in subdivision (v) of section 18810 as follows: "`Special library' means a library that is maintained by a parent organization to serve a specialized clientele; or an independent library that
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Jul 26, 1999
(See Hall v. City of Taft (1956) 47 Cal.2d 177, 183; City of Orange v. Valenti (1974) 37 Cal.App.3d 240, 244; Town of Atherton v. … v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Apr 11, 1990
Fund v. Riley (1937) 9 Cal.2d 126, 134-135; Burum v. State Compensation Ins. Fund (1947) 30 Cal.2d 575, 579-582; San Francisco v. Boyd (1941) 17 Cal.2d 606, 618-620; Kennedy v. … As noted in California State Employees' Assn. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Oct 8, 1999
(Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment Housing (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1379 , 1386 .) In ascertaining legislative intent, we turn first to the language used (Tracy v. … (Harris v. Capital Growth Investors XIV (1991) 52 Cal.3d 1142 , 1159 .) "`Words must be construed in context, and statutes must be harmonized, both internally and with each other, to the extent possible.'" (Woods v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Jan 13, 1994
(See County of Santa Clara v. Deputy Sheriffs' Assn. (1992) 3 Cal.4th 873; Beck v. County of Santa Clara (1988) 204 Cal.App.3d 789.) … (Reuter v. Board of Supervisors (1934) 220 Cal. 314, 320-321; Kelly v. Kane (1939) 34 Cal.App.2d 588, 591; More v. Board of Supervisors (1916) 31 Cal.App. 388, 392-393.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Apr 30, 1995
(County of Alameda v. State Board of Control (1993) 14 Cal.App.4th 1096, 1107; Burnsed v. State Bd. of Control (1987) 189 Cal.App.3d 213, 217.) … (County of Alameda v. State Board of Control, supra, 14 Cal.App.4th at 1107.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Jan 27, 1995
Distributing Co. v. … The Supreme Court noted in Flynn v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Aug 31, 1994
(See San Mateo City School District v. Public Employment Relations Board, supra, 33 Cal.3d at 866.) … Ward v. Hickey (1st Cir. 1993) 996 F.2d 448; Bradley v. Pittsburgh Board of Education (3d Cir. 1990) 910 F.2d 1172; Kirkland v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Oct 8, 1992
While a school district board must designate a civic center area at each school (Danskin v. San Diego Unified Sch. Dist. (1946) 28 Cal.2d, 536, 540; Goodman v. … (Payroll Guaranty Association v. Board of Education, 27 Cal.2d 197, 203.) . . . ."
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna