Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
955 results
2.03s
California Attorney General Reports · Dec 29, 2003
Brown Act (§§ 54950-54963), which authorizes local public agencies to hold closed sessions in limited situations, or in the Public Resources Code suggests that these local bodies have any role to play in the Board's closed … Brown Act that would qualify the Board's litigation concerns or real estate negotiations as appropriate subjects for the local bodies' closed sessions; rather, a local body's closed — session discretion is limited to litigation
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Opinion 23-102
107 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 47 · California Attorney General Reports · Apr 18, 2024
(a). 30 See 103 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 42, 43 (2020). 31 Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. Superior Court (2014) 59 Cal.4th 1029, 1037. 32 Halbert’s Lumber, Inc. v. … 44; see Southern California Edison Co. v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Sep 25, 2009
BROWN JR. Attorney General DANIEL G. STONE Deputy Attorney General THE HONORABLE GREGORY J. … Brown , 91 Cal. 523 , 524 (1891) (land purchase application invalid absent evidence that survey was performed by duly appointed deputy of county surveyor); Gates v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Jun 20, 1996
Board of Supervisors (1978) 85 Cal.App.3d 75, 80; Westinghouse Elec. Corp. v. County of Los Angeles (1974) 42 Cal.App.3d 32, 42, fn. 6; Madonna v. County of San Luis Obispo (1974) 39 Cal.App.3d 57, 61; A. F. … There is no mention in the Brown Act of county boards of equalization or county assessment appeals boards.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Sep 22, 2020
Moreno v. … (b)(1), italics added; see 84 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 30, 30- 31 (2001) (under the Brown Act, email may not be used to develop a collective concurrence as to board action); Bagley-Keene Guide, supra, at p. 6 (“serial meeting issues
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Sep 22, 2020
Moreno v. … (b)(1), italics added; see 84 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 30, 30- 31 (2001) (under the Brown Act, email may not be used to develop a collective concurrence as to board action); Bagley-Keene Guide, supra, at p. 6 (“serial meeting issues
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Feb 18, 2010
meeting of the board. … The Brown Act applies both to general law and charter cities. § 54951; San Diego Union v. City Council , 146 Cal.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Mar 24, 1988
(Brown v. Superior Court (1984) 37 Cal.3d 477, 485; California Highway Patrol v. Worker's Compensation Appeals Board (1986) 178 Cal.App.3d 1016, 1024.) We discern nothing in the Ralph M. … Brown Act's silence in this respect. (See generally Sacramento Newspaper Guild v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 263 Cal.App.2d 41.)
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Sep 14, 2004
Brown (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 1264 ("Brown"), the Court of Appeal held that fees charged by a high school district for driver training violated the Constitution since such training was part of the school curriculum and "educational … (Westfall v. Swoap (1976) 58 Cal.App.3d 109 , 114 ; see Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Bd. of Equalization (1998) 19 Cal.4th 1 , 7 , 11-12 ; Smith v. Board of Supervisors (2002) 104 Cal.App.4th 1104 , 1118 .)
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Apr 1, 1987
(Cuttino v. McKinley (1933) 130 Cal.App. 136, 138. See also Raley v. … (Henderson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Jan 16, 2009
BROWN JR. Attorney General TAYLOR S. … App. 4th at 659 ; Fraser-Yamor Agency, Inc. v. Co. of Del Norte , 68 Cal. App. 3d 201 , 215 (1977). 6 Stigall , 58 Cal. 2d at 570 (quoting U.S. v. Miss.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Oct 15, 1997
Brown Act (Gov. … conclusion would be equally applicable to the Monterey County Farm Bureau. 2 All references hereafter to the Government Code are by section number only. 3 We also note that in Henderson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Nov 2, 2021
Lacey v. … Ghafur v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedUntitled California Attorney General Opinion
California Attorney General Reports · Nov 2, 2021
Lacey v. … Ghafur v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Dec 20, 2005
Brown Act (Gov. … message board" constitutes making statements in a public forum, defined as place open to public where information is freely exchanged]; Los Angeles Times Communications v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Opinion 24-1002
California Attorney General Reports · Feb 12, 2026
National Lawyers Guild v. … Brown Act. 58 As such, the board is generally obliged to give the public notice and an opportunity to attend every meeting and to comment on every item of business. 59 And, although the Brown Act allows the board to discuss
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Nov 10, 1997
(See Joiner v. … (See also Lucas v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Opinion 24-1002
109 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 1 · California Attorney General Reports · Feb 12, 2026
National Lawyers Guild v. … Brown Act. 58 As such, the board is generally obliged to give the public notice and an opportunity to attend every meeting and to comment on every item of business. 59 And, although the Brown Act allows the board to discuss
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · May 27, 2008
BROWN JR. Attorney General TAYLOR S. … Code § 1099 (a)(2). 7 City of Stigall v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCalifornia Attorney General Reports · Dec 27, 2005
Brown and Chas. S. Luce are hereby appointed as trustees of the said reclamation district, to act until their successors are qualified. … Superior Court (1999) 21 Cal.4th 883 , 895 ; San Francisco Taxpayers Assn. v. Board of Supervisors (1992) 2 Cal.4th 571 , 577 [`A special act is considered an exception to the general statute']; Woods v.
Cited 0 timesPublished
Ask Donna