Case law

Coffey v. Shiomoto

60 Cal. 4th 1198 · California Supreme Court · Apr 6, 2015

In Burg v. … Group v.

Schreifer v. Industrial Accident Commission

61 Cal. 2d 289 · California Supreme Court · May 5, 1964

In Robinson v. … Co. v. Industrial Acc.

People v. Fields

35 Cal. 3d 329 · California Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1983

Assuming, as I must in light of Hovey v. … As in People v.

People v. Rosenstein-Cohn Cigar Co.

131 Cal. 153 · California Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1900

Did you organize a board of directors then by the election of officers? A. I think so. Q. Did you commence business? A. Tes, sir.” … (People v. Dashaway Assn., 84 Cal. 119 .) It is said in the above case that cases of forfeiture are divided into two classes: “1.

Northwestern Mutual Fire Ass'n v. Pacific Wharf & Storage Co.

187 Cal. 38 · California Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1921

(Klopper v. Levy, 98 Cal. 525 , [ 33 Pac. 444 ] ; King v. Davis, 34 Cal. 100 ; Barbour v. Flick, 126 Cal. 628, 632 , [ 59 Pac. 122 ]; Rudel v. County of Los Angeles, 118 Cal. 281 , [ 50 Pac. 400 ] ; Fernandez v. … W. 977 ] ; Dieterle v.

People v. Luker

63 Cal. 2d 464 · California Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1965

In People v. … Pursuant to Escobedo v.

Curtin v. Arroyo Ditch & Water Co.

147 Cal. 337 · California Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1905

There is a provision in the by-laws as follows: “It shall be in the discretion of the board of directors to withhold the water from any person failing to pay any assessment after ■the same has become, delinquent according … Appellant cites Mahoney v. Bostwick, 96 Cal. 54 , [ 31 Am. St. Rep. 175 , 30 Pac. 1020 ], as sustaining his. contention.

Bealmear v. Southern Cal. Edison Co.

22 Cal. 2d 337 · California Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1943

Thompson, supra, a statute penalizing such acts as throwing a switch, removing a rail, or placing any obstruction on any railroad with the intention of derailing any train, boarding a train with the intention of robbing the … (See People v. Shotwell, supra; People v. Frank, 28 Cal. 507 ; People v. Twedt, supra; People v. Clemett, supra.)

Burke v. Chrostowski

46 Cal. 2d 444 · California Supreme Court · May 4, 1956

Code, §15038), leaving defendant in the position of “a mere trustee” (Ruppe v. Utter, 76 Cal.App. 19, 25 [ 243 P. 715 ]; also Vangel v. Vangel, 116 Cal.App.2d 615, 628 [ 254 P.2d 919 ]; Vangel v. … (Bruce v. Bruce, 71 Cal.App.2d 641, 644 [ 163 P.2d 95 ]; Maslow v. Maslow, 117 Cal.App.2d 237, 243 [ 255 P.2d 65 ]; see also Hamilton v. Pacific Elec. Ry. Co., 12 Cal.2d 598, 602-603 [ 86 P.2d 829 ].)

Harriman v. Tetik

56 Cal. 2d 805 · California Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1961

(Ward v. Taggart, supra, at p. 742 ; see Panopulos v. Maderis, 47 Cal. 2d 337, 341 [ 303 P.2d 738 ].) … Code, §§ 24070-24074; see Martin v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Appeals Board, 52 Cal.2d 259, 261-262, 264 [ 341 P.2d 291 ]; Rishwain v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 162 Cal.App.2d 207 [ 328 P.2d 473 ].)

People v. Nelson

53 Cal. 4th 367 · California Supreme Court · Jan 12, 2012

In Davis v. … (E.g., People v. Martinez, supra, 47 Cal.4th at p. 952; People v.

People v. Antick

15 Cal. 3d 79 · California Supreme Court · Aug 26, 1975

The home needed landscaping and repairs and defendant agreed to do this work in exchange for room, board and a small salary, ranging from $50 to $200 per month. … In People v.

In Re Scott

52 Cal. 3d 968 · California Supreme Court · Jan 14, 1991

(Young v. … In Furey v.

People v. Comingore

20 Cal. 3d 142 · California Supreme Court · Nov 3, 1977

(People v. Camden (1976) 16 Cal.3d 808, 815 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 438 , 548 P.2d 1110 ]; People v. Stephenson (1974) 10 Cal.3d 652, 661 [ 111 Cal.Rptr. 556 , 517 P.2d 820 ]; People v. … (People v. Ruster (1976) 16 Cal.3d 690, 696 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 153 , 548 P.2d 353 ]; Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].)

Cohen v. Wright

22 Cal. 293 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1863

C. 503; Brown’s Case, 1 How., Miss., 303; Rice v. Commonwealth, 18 B. Monroe, 472.) … And these views are sustained by Patterson v. Board of Supervisors of Yuba County ( 13 Cal. 182 ); Wynehamer v. The People (3 Kernan, 431); Cochran v. Van Surley ( 20 Wend. 383 ).

Strauss v. Horton

46 Cal. 4th 364 · California Supreme Court · Jun 17, 2009

(See Crawford v. Board of Education (1976) 17 Cal.3d 280, 310 [ 130 Cal.Rptr. 724 , 551 P.2d 28 ].) … (Accord, Crawford v. Los Angeles Board of Education (1982) 458 U.S. 527, 546 [ 73 L.Ed.2d 948 , 102 S.Ct. 3211 ] (conc. opn. of Blackmun, I.)

Westerfeld v. New York Life Insurance

129 Cal. 68 · California Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1900

Code, sec. 1566 ; Morrison v. Lods, 39 Cal. 381 ; Bohall v. Diller, 41 Cal. 532 ; Herman v. Haffenegger, 54 Cal. 161 ; Wainwright v. Weske, 82 Cal. 193 . … See, also, the following, most of which are quite in point: Gould v. Cayuga Bank, 86 N.Y. 75 ; Graham v. Meyer, 99 N.Y. 611 ; Yeomans v. Bell, 151 N.Y. 230 ; Potter v. Monmouth Ins. Co., 63 Me. 440 ; Brown v.

Boysaw v. Superior Court

96 Cal. Rptr. 2d 531 · California Supreme Court · Jun 8, 2000

Opinion BROWN, J. Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari to review an order adjudging him in direct contempt of court. … In Bloom v.

Klein v. United States

50 Cal. 4th 68 · California Supreme Court · Jul 26, 2010

v. … Brown (1990) 50 Cal.3d 189 [ 266 Cal.Rptr. 491 , 785 P.2d 1183 ] [plaintiff injured when he ran his motorcycle into a fence on defendant’s property]; Delta Farms Reclamation Dist. v.

Matter of Application of Richardson

170 Cal. 68 · California Supreme Court · Apr 16, 1915

(See County of Plumas v. Wheeler, 149 Cal. 764 , [ 87 Pac. 909 ].) … The ease of Seattle v. Denchor, 58 Wash. 501 , [137 Am St. Rep. 1076, 28 L. R. A. (N.