Case law

Garrett v. Swanton

216 Cal. 220 · California Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1932

W. 115 ] ; Bell v. City of Fayette, 325 Mo. 75 [ 28 S. W. (2d) 356 ] ; Kasch v. Miller, 104 Ohio St. 281 [ 135 N. E. 813 ]; McClain v. Regents of University, 124 Or. 629 [ 265 Pac. 412 ] ; Barnes v. … In Shelton v.

Murray v. Murray

115 Cal. 266 · California Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1896

Bank v. … (Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U. S. 733 ; Brown v. Campbell, 100 Cal. *276 641 ; 38 Am. St. Rep. 314 .)

Dutton v. Warschauer

21 Cal. 609 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1863

(See Nagle v. Macy, 9 Cal. 426 ; Haffley v. Maier, 13 Id. 13 ; Koch v. Briggs, 14 Id. 256; Clark v. Baker, Id. 612; Johnson v. Sherman, 15 Id.) … (Lestrade v. Barth, 19 Cal. 660 ; Hunter v. Watson, 12 Id. 404; Pritchard v. Brown, 4 New Hamp. 404.)

Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Industrial Accident Commission

44 Cal. 2d 604 · California Supreme Court · May 27, 1955

Brown, Attorney General, Donald D. Stoker and W. B. Thayer, Deputy Attorneys General, for Petitioner. Everett A. Corten, Benjamin L. Wolfe and T. Groezinger for Respondents. SCHAUER, J. … Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com., 29 Cal.2d 79 [ 172 P.2d 884 ].)

Heard v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n

25 Cal. 2d 322 · California Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1944

Code, §§ 100, 101, 103,105; Estate of Puett, 1 Cal.2d 131, 133 [ 33 P.2d 825 ] ; see Eaton v. … Brown, 193 U.S. 411, 413 [ 24 S.Ct. 487 , 48 L.Ed. 730 ] ; Rest.: Property: Future Interests, parts 3 and 4, § 241, comment (a) and comments on subsee. (2), § 242, comments (a), (b) and (c); Wigmore, Evidence (2d ed.) §§

Security First National Bank v. Fairbank

62 Cal. 2d 213 · California Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1965

(See Lewis v. Hill, 387 Ill. 542 [ 56 N.E.2d 619 ]; In re Estate of Bierstedt, 254 *217 Iowa 772 [ 119 N.W.2d 234 ]; Walsh v. Gillespie, 338 Mass. 278 [ 154 N.E.2d 906 ]; Morse v. … (Decorative Carpets, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization, 58 Cal.2d 252, 256 [ 23 Cal.Rptr. 589 , 373 P.2d 637 ]; see also Model Probate Code, § 231 (Simes 1946).)

Levy v. Superior Court

15 Cal. 2d 692 · California Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1940

In Harper v. … v.

Lonicki v. Sutter Health Central

74 Cal. Rptr. 3d 570 · California Supreme Court · Apr 7, 2008

The Moore-Brown-Roberti Family Rights Act (Gov. … (See Stekloff v. St. John’s Mercy Health Systems (8th Cir. 2000) 218 F.3d 858 .)

Title G. Etc. Co. v. Railroad Commission

168 Cal. 295 · California Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1914

(See Hatch v. Consumers’ Co., 17 Idaho, 204 , [40 L. R. A. (N. S.) 263, 104 Pac. 670 ] ; Consumers’ Co. v. Hatch, 224 U. S. 148 , [ 56 L. Ed. 703 , 32 Sup. Ct. Rep. 465]; Pocatello W. Co. v. … Standley, 7 Idaho, 518 , [ 61 Pac. 518 ] ; Bothwell v. Consumers’ Co., 13 Idaho, 568 , [24 L. R. A. (N. S.) 485, 92 Pac. 533 ] ; Montgomery v. McDade (Ala.), 60 South. 797 ; Pine Bluff v. Toney, 96 Ark. 345 , [Ann.

Rannard v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.

26 Cal. 2d 149 · California Supreme Court · Mar 20, 1945

(Bergen v. Tulare County Power Co., 173 Cal. 709 [ 161 P. 269 ]; Barbieri v. Law, 209 Cal. 429 [ 287 P. 464 ]; Taylor v. Oakland Scavenger Co., 12 Cal.2d 310 [ 83 P.2d 948 ]; Latky v. … Brown, 114 Cal.App. 239 [ 299 P. 753 ], which appear to require a high degree of particularity in the pleading of negligence.

People v. Williams

34 Cal. 4th 397 · California Supreme Court · Oct 18, 2004

In People v. … J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., Chin, J., Brown, J., and Moreno, J., concurred. We overruled Tassell on an unrelated point in People v. Ewoldt (1994) 7 Cal.4th 380, 401 [ 27 Cal.Rptr.2d 646 , 867 P.2d 757 ].

Riverside Land Co. v. Jarvis

174 Cal. 316 · California Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1917

Co. v. Spring V. W. … (Gibbs v. Long Island etc. Co., 83 Hun, 92 , [ 31 N. Y. Supp. 406 ]; Mechanics’ Bank v. Merchants’ Bank, 45 Mo. 516 , [ 100 Am. Dec. 388 ]; St. Louis I. Co. v. Goodfellow, 9 Mo. 149 .) In Lum v. American Wheel etc.

Klopstock v. Superior Court

17 Cal. 2d 13 · California Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1941

(Hawes v. Oakland, 104 *17 U. S. 450 [ 26 L. Ed. 827 ]; Difani v. Riverside County Oil Co., 201 Cal. 210 [ 256 Pac. 210 ]; Whitten v. … (Brown v. Critchell, 110 Ind. 31, 34 [ 7 N. E. 888 , 11 N. E. 486 ]; Louisville & N. R. Co. v. Brantley’s Admr., 96 Ky. 297, 302 [ 28 S. W. 477 , 49 Am. St. Rep. 291 ]; Poe v.

Weber v. State Bar

47 Cal. 3d 492 · California Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1988

(Marquette v. State Bar, supra, 44 Cal.3d at p. 266; Maltaman v. State Bar (1987) 43 Cal.3d 924, 958 [ 239 Cal.Rptr. 687 , 741 P.2d 185 ]; cf. Segretti v. … He contends the review board had a “sleazy attitude” and “failed to grasp the basics of this matter,” and asserts that the board’s members “do not understand or comprehend” the meaning of “moral turpitude.”

Johnson v. Ford Motor Co.

29 Cal. Rptr. 3d 401 · California Supreme Court · Jun 16, 2005

In the companion case of Simon v. San Paolo U.S. … Brown, J., concurred.

Hicks v. Michael

15 Cal. 107 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1860

(Const. art. 6, sec. 4; 2 Moorhead & Brown’s Dig. (Ky.) 812; Id. vol. 1, pp. 61, 62.) II. The Court below erred in excluding testimony in support of the complaint. (Pr. Act, sec. 118; Krom v. Hagan, 4 How. Pr. … (Kane v. *113 Whittick, 8 Wend. 229 ; Calder v. Knickerbocker, 2 Cow. 31 ; Campbell v. Stokes, 2 Wend. 145 ; Houghton v. Starr, 4 Id. 175 ; Graham on Jurisdiction, 606.)

City of Gilroy v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court · Jan 15, 2026

Williams v. … Assn. v.

Tynan v. Walker

35 Cal. 634 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1868

Brown, 4 McCord, 423 ; Levering v. Rittenhouse, 4 Wharton, 130 .) … As in Hall v.

Cooper v. Swoap

11 Cal. 3d 856 · California Supreme Court · Jul 2, 1974

Sacramento Newspaper Guild v. … (Ralphs Grocery Co. v. Reimel (1968) 69 Cal.2d 172, 179 [ 70 Cal.Rptr. 407 , 444 P.2d 79 ]; Pitts v. Perluss (1962) 58 Cal.2d 824, 832 [ 27 Cal.Rptr. 19 , 377 P.2d 83 ].)

Cashman v. Root

12 L.R.A. 511 · California Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1891

(Ruchizky v. De Haven, 97 Pa. St. 202; North v. Phillips, 89 Pa. St. 250; Dickson v. Thomas, 97 Pa. St. 278; Gheen v. Johnson, 90 Pa. St. 38.) In Ingraham v. … (Irwin v. Williar, 110 U. S. 510 .)