Case law

Santa Cruz Railroad v. Board of Supervisors

62 Cal. 239 · California Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1882

(Nevada Bank v. Steinmetz, 10 P. C. L. J. 459.) Judgment affirmed. McKee, Myrick, and Thornton, JJ., dissented.

Dobbins v. Board of Supervisors of Yuba County

5 Cal. 414 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1855

Tieberg v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

2 Cal. 3d 931 · California Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1970

Lassie filed a petition for reassessment with the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (hereafter called the board) contending that the writers were independent contractors. … In Bartels v.

Dalton v. Board of Water Commissioners

1 Cal. Unrep. 776 · California Supreme Court · May 6, 1873

That fact is a jurisdictional fact: Gilmer v. Lime Point, 19 Cal. 47 ; Contra Costa R. R. v. Moss, 23 Cal. 329 .

City of Pomona v. State Board of Equalization

53 Cal. 2d 305 · California Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1959

judicially construed as “not a tax on the sale or because of the sale but ... an excise tax for the privilege of conducting a retail business measured by the gross receipts from sales. ’ ’ (Livingston Rock & Gravel Co. v. … In the agreements which the cities and county entered into with the Board of Equalization for the board’s administration of the local sales taxes, the cities and county agreed that “the Board shall prescribe and adopt such

American Civil Liberties Union v. Board of Education

55 Cal. 2d 906 · California Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1961

. — Petitioners seek a writ of mandate to compel the Board of Education of the City of San Diego to grant their application for the use of certain school buildings in San Diego in which to hold a series of monthly public … As in the companion Los Angeles School Board case (L. A. 25788, ante, p. 167 [ 10 Cal.Rptr. 647 , 359 P.2d 45 ]), petitioners refused to furnish the required “Statement of Information” (Ed.

State Board of Chiropractic Examiners v. Superior Court

201 Cal. 108 · California Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1927

In Suckow v. … Riley, 187 Cal. 121 [ 200 Pac. 1042 ]; Anderson v. Board of Dental Examiners, 27 Cal. App. 336 [ 149 Pac. 1006 ]; Dyment v. Board of Medical Examiners, 57 Cal. App. 260 [ 207 Pac. 409 ].)

Townsend v. State Bar

36 Cal. 2d 631 · California Supreme Court · Jan 23, 1951

The Board of Governors, after consideration of the record found: Although Townsend never claimed more than 40 per cent of the amounts collected, he did not unqualifiedly tender or pay Brown any part of the amount collected … The petitioner contends that the record does not support the findings of fact of the Board of Governors.

Wilson v. Board of Directors of Veterans' Home

138 Cal. 67 · California Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1902

The trial court sustained the demurrer on the authority of Oroville and V. R. R. Co. v. … See, also, Oroville and V. R. R. Co. v. Plumas County, 37 Cal. 354 .) Here the benefit of the act or duty which it is claimed should be performed is purely personal. The judgment should be affirmed.

People ex rel. Moore v. Board of Supervisors

45 Cal. 692 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1873

By the Court: The provision of the Act providing for the government of the County of Sacramento (Stats. 1863, p. 503), which declares that the Board of Supervisors shall be a body politic and corporate, does not make that … The Board of Supervisors did not exceed its jurisdiction, in passing the order dividing the county into the requisite number of Supervisor Districts. Order affirmed.

Gough Industries, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization

51 Cal. 2d 746 · California Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1959

Co. v. State Board of Equalization, 136 Cal. … Terminal Co. v.

Industrial Indemnity Exchange v. State Board of Equalization

26 Cal. 2d 772 · California Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1945

Co. v. Richardson, 192 Cal. 369 [ 219 P. 1003 ].) … The subscribers must act through the governing board of the exchange organization. The status of an exchange and its subscribers is discussed in Mitchell v.

Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Franchise Tax Board

7 Cal. 3d 544 · California Supreme Court · Jul 13, 1972

(Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, 3 Cal.3d 745, 749-753 .) … (Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board, supra, 3 Cal.3d 745, 749-750 ; italics omitted.)

Barclays Bank International, Ltd. v. Franchise Tax Board

2 Cal. 4th 708 · California Supreme Court · May 11, 1992

In Container Corp. v. … And in Exxon Corp. v.

National Geographic Society v. State Board of Equalization

16 Cal. 3d 637 · California Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1976

Defendant Board of Equalization of the State of California (Board) appeals from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff National Geographic Society (Society) ordering that defendant refund certain use taxes to plaintiff. … The Board agreed to postpone collection of the remainder until this action determined the constitutionality of the asserted liability.

Pacific Lumber Co. v. State Water Resources Control Board

38 Cal. Rptr. 3d 220 · California Supreme Court · Jan 30, 2006

(See Wells v. … (c), 459; see also Brown v. City of Los Angeles (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 155, 172, fn. 10 [ 125 Cal.Rptr.2d 474 ]; Dunn-Edwards Corp. v.

City of Long Beach v. Board of Supervisors

50 Cal. 2d 674 · California Supreme Court · Aug 12, 1958

(See City of Los Angeles v. Ford, 12 Cal.2d 407 [ 84 P.2d 1042 ]; Smith v. City of Santa Monica, supra, 162 Cal. 221 ; People v. Board of Supervisors, 126 Cal.App. 670 [ 15 P.2d 209 ].) … (People v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 126 Cal.App. 670 .)

Shaeffer v. State Bar of Cal.

220 Cal. 681 · California Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1934

Brown to a deed and attached his own notarial certificate purporting to certify to the acknowledgment thereof by Beatrice L. Brown. … If the attorney through neglect or otherwise fails to make a complete disclosure, he may be unable on a review to show that the decision of the board is erroneous. (Stafford v.

Cadierque v. Duran

49 Cal. 356 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1874

The plaintiff in 1871 filed a protest against the approval of the location made by Duran; and on the 8th of January, 1872, defendant Brown also filed a like protest; and on the 12th of January, 1872, the plaintiff applied … to a transfer to Brown of Duran’s right to purchase the lands from the State.

City of Burbank v. State Water Resources Control Board

26 Cal. Rptr. 3d 304 · California Supreme Court · Apr 4, 2005

EPA v. California ex rel. … (See Solid Waste Agency v.