holding "provision forfeiting plaintiff's 8 pension rights if he works for a competitor restrains him from engaging in a lawful 9 business and is therefore void"
How later courts described this case
- holding "provision forfeiting plaintiff's 8 pension rights if he works for a competitor restrains him from engaging in a lawful 9 business and is therefore void"
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
The Court:
We are satisfied, from the record, that the conditions precedent upon which the respondent was entitled to have the bonds issued to it, had all been performed by it, before the commencement of this proceeding, and therefore that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed. (Nevada Bank v. Steinmetz, 10 P. C. L. J. 459.)
Judgment affirmed.
McKee, Myrick, and Thornton, JJ., dissented.