Case law

People v. Boyer

48 Cal. 3d 247 · California Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1989

(Dunaway v. New York (1979) 442 U.S. 200, 216-217 [ 60 L.Ed.2d 824, 838-839 , 99 S.Ct. 2248 ]; Brown v. Illinois (1975) 422 U.S. 590, 602-604 [ 45 L.Ed.2d 416, 426-428 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 ].) … (Taylor v. Alabama (1982) 457 U.S. 687, 690 [ 73 L.Ed.2d 314, 319 , 102 S.Ct. 2664 ], quoting Brown, supra, 422 U.S. at p. 602 *269 [ 45 L.Ed.2d at p. 426 ], which in turn quotes Wong Sun v.

Guinn v. McReynolds

177 Cal. 230 · California Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1918

The section then proceeded as follows: ‘ ‘ The expense thereof shall be a county charge, and the board of supervisors shall allow and pay the same out of the general fund of the county. … In California Loan and Trust Co. v.

Younger v. Jordan

42 Cal. 2d 757 · California Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1954

(Bank of California v. Superior Court, 16 Cal.2d 516, 521-522 [ 106 P.2d 879 ]; California Cotton Credit Corp. v. Superior Court, 122 Cal.App. 404, 407 [ 10 P.2d 176 ]; Hershey v. … Cole, 130 Cal.App. 683, 701 [ 20 P.2d 972 ]; Ash v. Superior Court, 33 Cal.App. 800, 803-804 [ 166 P. 841 ].) In Ash v.

Moulton v. Moulton

182 Cal. 185 · California Supreme Court · Feb 3, 1920

(Schuyler v. Broughton, 70 Cal. 282 , [ 11 Pac. 719 ]; Flourney v. Flourney, 86 Cal. 286 , [ 21 Am. St. Rep. 39 , 24 Pac. 1012 ]; Heney v. Pesoli, 109 Cal. 53 , [ 41 Pac. 819 ]; Dyment v. … Nelson, 166 Cal. 38 , [ 134 Pac. 988 ] ; Nilson v. Sarment, 153 Cal. 524 , [ 126 Am. St.

Cox v. City of Oakland

California Supreme Court · Jan 23, 2025

(Prang v. Los Angeles County Assessment Appeals Board (2024) 15 Cal.5th 1152, 1170 (Prang).) … People ex rel Brown v. Tehama County Bd. of Supervisors (2007) 149 Cal.App.4th 422 (Tehama), which plaintiff relies on heavily, does not support its position.

Calpetro Producers Syndicate v. Chas M. Woods Co.

206 Cal. 246 · California Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1929

The whole writing with respect to the transaction read as follows: “This is to certify that I have sold to William Miller my brown Maltese Jack, for $1,000. N. Van Tassel.” … .” *253 In Peterson v. Chaix, 5 Cal.

East Bay Municipal Utility District v. Railroad Commission

194 Cal. 603 · California Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1924

Co. v. … A. 755, 28 Pac. 272, 675 ]; Bettencourt v. Industrial Acc. Com., 175 Cal. 559 [166 Pac. 323]; Robertson v. Library Trustees, 136 Cal. 403 [ 69 Pac. 88 ]; Mesmer v. Board etc., 23 Cal.

Lacoe v. Industrial Accident Commission

211 Cal. 82 · California Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1930

The case of Catto v. Plant, 106 Conn. 236 [ 137 Atl. 764 ], is much re *85 lied upon in this connection. … The intention here is plainly to exclude employments of a personal as distinguished from an industrial character, for domestic service as such is not excluded; such employment in hotels, apartments and boarding-houses is

People v. Johnson

10 Cal. 3d 868 · California Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1974

(See People v. West, 3 Cal.3d 595, 607-608 [ 91 Cal.Rptr. 385 , 477 P.2d 409 ]; People v. Smith, 22 Cal.App.3d 25, 30 [ 99 Cal.Rptr. 171 ].) … See also People v. Barajas, 26 Cal.App.3d 932, 937 [ 103 Cal.Rptr. 405 ].

Ferris v. Coover

10 Cal. 589 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1858

S. v. … In the case of Charles Covillaud et al. v. The United States, before the Board of Land Commissioners, in which Covillaud et al. claimed under the grant to John A. Sutter, the deposition of Governor Juan B.

People v. Stanley

47 Cal. Rptr. 3d 420 · California Supreme Court · Aug 24, 2006

(People v. Brown (2004) 33 Cal.4th 382, 402 [ 15 Cal.Rptr.3d 624 , 93 P.3d 244 ] (Brown).) Unanimity is required only as to the appropriate penalty. (People v. … (Brown, supra, 33 Cal.4th at p. 401 ; People v. Lenart (2004) 32 Cal.4th 1107, 1136 [ 12 Cal.Rptr.3d 592 , 88 P.3d 498 ]; People v.

Imperial Merchant Services, Inc. v. Hunt

47 Cal. 4th 381 · California Supreme Court · Aug 10, 2009

(Lara v. Board of Supervisors (1976) 59 Cal.App.3d 399, 408-409 [ 130 Cal.Rptr. 668 ].) CRS argues that “[w]here . . . … (Lara v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 59 Cal.App.3d at p. 408 .)

Gyerman v. United States Lines Co.

7 Cal. 3d 488 · California Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1972

Bayer also stated that there is “[n]o way whatsoever” for a longshoreman to remove the cargo once it is stacked three pallet boards high, with 30 or more stacks per pallet board, without exposing himself to danger. … (Gyerman v.

Clugston v. Garretson

103 Cal. 441 · California Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1894

“And further answering, defendant avers: “That at the time at which said words were spoken by him certain litigation was pending between plaintiff and this defendant, with others, over an election of a board of directors … Chamberlin v. Vance, 51 Cal. 75 ; Fleming v. Albeck, 67 Cal. 226 ; Thompson v. Barkley, 27 Pa. St. 263. I think the complaint is sufficient to stand the test of a general demurrer. '2.

City of Santa Cruz v. Southern Pac. R.R.

163 Cal. 538 · California Supreme Court · Aug 19, 1912

(Jones v. Petaluma, 36 Cal. 238 . See, also, Davoust v. Alameda, 149 Cal. 74 , [9 Ann. Cas. 847, 5 L. R. A. (N. S.) 536, 84 Pac. 760 ]; Arnold v. San Jose, 81 Cal. 618 , [ 22 Pac. 877 ].) 2. … (Ward v. Mulford, 32 Cal. 372 ; Oakland v. Oakland W. F. Co., 118 Cal. 182 , [ 50 Pac. 277 ]; People v. Kerber, 152 Cal. 733 , [ 125 Am. St. Rep. 93 , 93 Pac. 878 ].)

Mannix v. R. L. Radke Co.

166 Cal. 333 · California Supreme Court · Oct 16, 1913

Two coats of hair mortar 30c. per yard sand finish 27c per yard two coats of brown mortar “Thomas Mannix.” … The decisions of this court in Laidlaw v. Marye, 133 Cal. 170 , [ 65 Pac. 391 ], and Congdon v.

Jones v. Gunn

149 Cal. 687 · California Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1906

Soc. v. … Brown, 119 Cal. 299 , [ 63 Am. St. Rep. 108 , 51 Pac. 2 , 542], cannot matter to appellants, since in the course pursued by the court there was no invasion of any of their rights.

Kimic v. San Jose-Los Gatos Interurban Ry.

156 Cal. 379 · California Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1909

(Harrison v. Sutter St. Ry. Co., 134 Cal. 549 , [ 66 Pac. 787 ]; Tompkins v. Clay St. R. R. Co., 66 Cal. 163 , [ 4 Pac. 1165 ].) … (See Davey v. Southern Pacific Co., 116 Cal. 330 , [ 48 Pac. 117 ]; People v. Wallace, 89 Cal. 166 , [ 26 Pac. 650 ]; Parker v. Smith, 4 Cal. 105 .)

Original Mining & Milling Co. v. San Joaquin Light & Power Corp.

220 Cal. 152 · California Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1934

He undoubtedly had the implicit confidence of his business associates, including the members of the board of directors of the plaintiff mining company. … (Ryder v. Bamberger, 172 Cal. 791, 799 [ 158 Pac. 753, 756 ].)

People v. Lapierre

205 Cal. 462 · California Supreme Court · Nov 5, 1928

(People v. Yeager, 194 Cal. 452, 483 [ 229 Pac. 40 ]; People v. Brown, 59 Cal. 345 ; People v. Kauffman, 152 Cal. 331 [ 92 Pac. 861 ]; People v. Arnold, 199 Cal. 471, 487 [ 250 Pac. 168 ].) … The rule and its exception are stated in People v.