Case law

County of Alameda v. Board of Retirement

46 Cal. 3d 902 · California Supreme Court · Sep 19, 1988

In Drummey v. … (See Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of Equal. (1936) 6 Cal.2d 557, 559 [ 59 P.2d 119 ].)

Board of Supervisors v. Superior Court

5 Cal. Unrep. 797 · California Supreme Court · Sep 17, 1897

Petition for certiorari to review the judgment of the superior court removing the board of supervisors of the city and county of San Francisco from office in a proceeding under the provisions of the act of March 7, 1881 (

Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Franchise Tax Board

3 Cal. 3d 745 · California Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1970

(See Miller v. McColgan (1941) 17 Cal.2d 432, 437-440 [ 110 P.2d 419 , 134 A.L.R. 1424 ]; Robinson v. McColgan (1941) 17 Cal.2d 423 [ 110 P.2d 426 ].) … Holly Sugar Corp. v.

Reclamation District No. 1500 v. Reclamation Board

197 Cal. 482 · California Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1925

Soc. v. … In the more recent ease of McNutt v.

Wehrle v. Board of Water & Power Commissioners

211 Cal. 70 · California Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1930

(City of South Pasadena v. Pasadena L. & W. Co., 152 Cal. 593 [ 93 Pac. 490 ].) … Co. v. Town of Sausalito, 168 Cal. 587, 598 [ 143 Pac. 767 ].)

Freedom Newspapers, Inc. v. Orange County Employees Retirement System Board of Directors

6 Cal. 4th 821 · California Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1993

(Brown v. Kelly Broadcasting Co. (1989) 48 Cal.3d 711, 724 [ 257 Cal.Rptr. 708 , 771 P.2d 406 ].) … Board of Supervisors (1992) 2 Cal.4th 571, 577 [ 7 Cal.Rptr.2d 245 , 828 P.2d 147 ]; see also Yoffie v. Marin Hospital Dist. (1987) 193 Cal.App.3d 743, 750-753 [ 238 Cal.Rptr. 502 ]; Kennedy v.

Tri-Fanucchi Farms v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

225 Cal. Rptr. 3d 545 · California Supreme Court · Nov 27, 2017

Board (1943) 319 U.S. 533, 540; see Nish Noroian Farms v. … Name of Opinion Tri-Fanucchi Farms v.

Vista Irrigation District v. Board of Supervisors

32 Cal. 2d 477 · California Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1948

The 1947 amendment and problems similar to those here raised are discussed in County of Mariposa v. Merced Irrigation District, ante, p. 467 [ 196 P.2d 920 ]. … However, in this case the district seeks by mandamus to compel the Board of Supervisors of San Diego County to cancel the assessment of taxes on its property, the board having refused to cancel on the ground that the district

Le Febvre v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

69 Cal. 2d 386 · California Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1968

Co. v. Workmen’s Comp. App. Bd. (1967) 66 Cal.2d 944 [ 59 Cal.Rptr. 622 , 428 P.2d 606 ]; Schreifer v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1964) 61 Cal.2d 289 [ 38 Cal.Rptr. 352 , 391 P.2d 832 ] ; Shell Oil Co. v. Industrial Acc. … Co. v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1924) 193 Cal. 413, 419 [ 224 P. 754 ] ; California Cas. Indem. Exchange v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1936) 5 Cal.2d 185 , 186 [ 53 P.2d 758 ] ■ see also Wiseman v. Industrial Acc.

Zurich Insurance v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

9 Cal. 3d 848 · California Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1973

In Subsequent Injuries Fund v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … (See Sutton v. Industrial Acc. Com. (1956) 46 Cal.2d 791, 795-796 [ 298 P.2d 857 ]; Al Gene Sportswear v. Ind. Acc. Com. (1961) 196 Cal.App.2d 709, 712 [ 16 Cal.Rptr. 760 ]; Westvaco etc. Corp. v. Ind. Acc.

Slevin v. Board of Police Fund Commissioners

123 Cal. 130 · California Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1898

Edward Brown & Sons v. City & County of San Francisco

36 Cal. 2d 272 · California Supreme Court · Oct 27, 1950

Thus, in Richardson v. … (See also Warden v. City of South Pasadena (1914), 168 Cal. 612 [ 143 P. 776 ]; Diener v. Shaul (1923), 60 Cal.App. 633, 634 [ 213 P. 706 ]; Cummings v.

Clarke v. Police Life & Health Insurance Board

127 Cal. 550 · California Supreme Court · Feb 8, 1900

A general demurrer to his petition was sustained, and judgment passed in favor of the board. … (Pennie v. Reis, 80 Cal. 266 ; Pennie v. Reis, 132 U. S. 470 ; Clarke v. Reis, 87 Cal. 543 .) By this act it was provided that pensions should be paid to policemen retired after twenty years’ service.

Wallis v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners

11 Cal. 2d 430 · California Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1938

that upon such acquisition this Board should and will exercise the poAver granted to it by said section, in accordance Avith said report.” … The payroll, including the petitioners’ compensation, was certified by the board of water and power commissioners in all respects as required by the rules governing that board, but the civil service commissioners refused

Prantil v. State Bar

23 Cal. 3d 243 · California Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1979

On *247 December 12, 1977, the panel heard Brown’s testimony; at this time Brown was cross-examined by petitioner and members of the board. … The recommendation of the board as to discipline is given great weight. (Fitzpatrick v. State Bar (1977) 20 Cal.3d 73, 87 [ 141 Cal.Rptr. 169 , 569 P.2d 763 ].)

Central Pacific Railroad v. Board of Equalization

34 Cal. 352 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1867

It is not asserted that the evidence produced before the Board was taken in writing, or that it was preserved in any manner whatsoever, or is to be found in any document under the control of the Board or their Clerk. … (Blair v. Hamilton, 32 Cal. 49 ; 14 Cal. 479 ; 15 Cal. 300 .)

Wells, Fargo & Co. v. State Board of Equalization

56 Cal. 194 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1880

(See Houghton v. Austin, 47 Cal. 662 ; People v. Salomon, 46 Ill. 333 .) . As was said by Marshall, C. J., in Mc Cullogh v. … In Voorhees v.

Morning Star Co. v. State Board of Equalization

42 Cal. Rptr. 3d 47 · California Supreme Court · Apr 24, 2006

Citing to our decision in Tidewater Marine Western, Inc. v. … (Engelmann v.

Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

81 Cal. Rptr. 2d 521 · California Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1999

Chevron challenged the Board’s order in a petition for a writ of review. The Court of Appeal affirmed the order of the Board in a published opinion. (Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Workers’ Comp. … Co. v.

Judson Steel Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeals Board

22 Cal. 3d 658 · California Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1978

v. … As the court held in Robinson v.