Opinion

Vista Irrigation District v. Board of Supervisors

  • 32 Cal. 2d 477
  • 196 P.2d 926
  • 1948 Cal. LEXIS 238
Court
California Supreme Court
Filed
Aug 30, 1948
Status
Published
Author
Carter
On the bench
Carter
Cited by
7 cases
Authority
More cited than 76.9%

The opinion

CARTER, J.

In this ease petitioner for a writ of mandate is an irrigation district which proceeded under the Irrigation *478 District Law as it existed prior to its amendment in 1947 to include within its boundaries property owned by it. The 1947 amendment and problems similar to those here raised are discussed in County of Mariposa v. Merced Irrigation District, ante, p. 467 [ 196 P.2d 920 ]. However, in this case the district seeks by mandamus to compel the Board of Supervisors of San Diego County to cancel the assessment of taxes on its property, the board having refused to cancel on the ground that the district could not escape taxation of its property formerly outside of its boundaries by annexing it. It is asserted that mandamus is not available as petitioner has an adequate remedy at law. That contention must be sustained. The unavailability of that remedy is settled (Sherman v. Quinn, 31 Cal.2d 661 [ 192 P.2d 17 ]).

The petition for the writ is denied. The alternative writ is discharged.

Gibson, C. J., Shenk, J., Edmonds, J., Traynor, J., Schauer, J., and Spence, J., concurred.

Petitioner’s application for a rehearing was denied September 27,1948. Traynor, J., voted for a rehearing.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.