Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filterscal

10,000+ results

1.91s

  • Bradpiece v. State Bar

    10 Cal. 3d 742 · California Supreme Court · Feb 6, 1974

    Honoroff v. … Rptr. 657 , 454 P.2d 329 ]; Yapp v. State Bar (1965) supra, 62 Cal.2d 809, 817 ; Demain v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Joost v. Bennett

    123 Cal. 424 · California Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1899

    of supervisors, and certain members composing said board, of the city and county of San Francisco, to declare and order vacated the franchise for railroad purposes granted to the said corporation. … (See, on this subject, Gurnee v. Maloney, 38 Cal. 85 ; 99 Am. Dec. 352 ; Firebaugh v. Burbank, 121 Cal. 186 ; Estate of Kasson, 119 Cal. 489 ; Estate of Kruger, ante, p. 391.)

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Appeal of S. O. Houghton

    42 Cal. 35 · California Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1871

    In Knowles v. … The very able Judge who wrote the opinion in Knowles v. Yeates evidently felt that the case of Conant v.

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Lowe v. Yolo Cty. Consol. Water Co.

    157 Cal. 503 · California Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1910

    In Bradley v. Iowa Central Ry. Co., 111 Iowa, 562 , [ 82 N. … of directors, who, as said in Maynard v.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Steiner v. State Bar

    68 Cal. 2d 707 · California Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1968

    Petitioner contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the board’s findings. … Findings of fact made by local administrative committees and disciplinary boards are not binding on this court, which may weigh the evidence upon which the findings rest. (Zitny v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Lemoge Electric v. County of San Mateo

    46 Cal. 2d 659 · California Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1956

    Mills v. Schulba, 95 Cal. … Nevertheless, on February 2d, the board by resolution accepted the erroneous bid.

    Cited 90 timesPublished
  • Ames v. Empire Star Mines Co., Ltd.

    17 Cal. 2d 213 · California Supreme Court · Jan 31, 1941

    This principle is further supported by the California cases (Van Ness v. Rooney, 160 Cal. 131 [ 116 Pac. 392 ]; Chicago Quartz M. Co. v. Oliver, 75 Cal. 194 [ 16 Pac. 780 , 7 Am. St. Rep. 143 ]; Brown v. Luddy, 121 Cal. … (Van Ness v. Rooney, supra; Brown v. Luddy, supra.)

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Slater v. McAvoy

    123 Cal. 437 · California Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1899

    (Woerner’s American Law of Administration, secs. 351, 352, 536; Balch v. Hooper, 32 Minn. 138 ; Giles v. Brown, 60 Ga. 658 .) … (Tudhope v. Potts, 91 Mich. 490 ; Tudhope v. Avery, 106 Mich. 149 ; Farrington v. Secor, 91 Iowa, 606 ; Fulgham v. Herstein, 77 Ala. 496 ; Moore v. Armstrong, 9 Port. 697 ; State v. Porter, 9 Ind. 342 ; Curtis v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Ventura County v. Clay

    114 Cal. 242 · California Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1896

    (Bailey v. Sloan, 65 Cal. 387 .) … This point has been considered, but the following cases relating to the duty and responsibility of the treasurer may be added: Merriam v. Board of Supervisors, 72 Cal. 517 ; Linden v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Topley v. Zeeman

    216 Cal. 182 · California Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1932

    I just saw the ends of boards”. … (Mairo v. Yellow Cab Co., 208 Cal. 350, 351 [ 281 Pac. 66 ] ; California Packing Corp. v. Lopez, 207 Cal. 600, 603 [64 A. L. R. 1412, 279 Pac. 664 ]; Bannister v. Los Angeles Ry.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • People v. Brendlin

    45 Cal. Rptr. 3d 50 · California Supreme Court · Jun 29, 2006

    In response to the deputy’s inquiry, defendant falsely identified himself as Bruce Brown. … (See United States v. Drayton, supra, 536 U.S. at pp. 203-204 [no seizure occurred when officers boarded the bus and began questioning passengers].)

    Vacated by Brendlin v. California, 551 U.S. 249 (2007)Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Wittenbrock v. Cass

    110 Cal. 1 · California Supreme Court · Nov 7, 1895

    (Citing Brison v. Brison, 75 Cal. 525 ; 7 Am. St. Rep. 189 , and other cases.) We do not think this contention can be sustained. … The case of Bury v. Young, 98 Cal. 446 , 35 Am. St. Rep. 186 , is in many respects very similar to this.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Tiernan v. Trustees of California State University and Colleges

    33 Cal. 3d 211 · California Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1982

    Procedure (2d ed. 1971) Appeal, § 425, p. 4391; Johnston v. … (Abelleira v.

    Cited 268 timesPublished
  • Davis v. Chalfant

    81 Cal. 627 · California Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1889

    The following cases bear more or less directly on the general question as to the sufficiency of the complaint in this case: Long v. Smith, 39 Tex. 160 ; Seay v. Hughes, 5 Sneed, 155 ; Crim v. Handley, 94 U. … S. 652 ; Kern v. Strausberger, 71 Ill. 413 ; Brown v. Wilson, 56 Ga. 534 ; Nicholson v. Patterson, 6 Humph. 394 ; Newman v. Morris, 52 Miss. 402 ; Quinn v. Wetherbee, 41 Cal. 247 ; Boston v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Pratt-Low Preserving Co. v. Jordan

    217 Cal. 292 · California Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1933

    Since 1919 and until April, 1932, petitioner purported to act by and through a board of nine directors. … Cas. 1914C, 655]; Tashiro v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 [ 256 Pac. 545 , 53 A. L. R. 1279].)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Miller v. Heilbron

    58 Cal. 133 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1881

    He demanded of the Board of Assessors that the valuation on his shares should be reduced to one dollar—the sum fixed by his affidavit as the balance of value. The Board of Assessors refused to make the reduction. … In People v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Complete Service Bureau v. San Diego County Medical Society

    43 Cal. 2d 201 · California Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1954

    Co. v. … (See Accounting Corp. v. State Board of Accountancy, 34 Cal.2d 186 [ 208 P.2d 984 ].) In Maloney v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Coleman v. San Rafael Turnpike. Rd. Co.

    49 Cal. 517 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1875

    The evidence tends to prove each of these facts; and these facts establish a sufficient possession, *521 within the rule laid down in Sepulveda v. … , known as the San Bafael Turnpike Boad Company, and their successors in interest, in proportion to the amount of stock held or owned by each, with powers of sale, to sell and convey the same, under the direction of the Board

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • County of San Bernardino v. Harsh California Corp.

    52 Cal. 2d 341 · California Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1959

    Defendant pleaded that the designee of the Secretary of Defense had determined that defendant was entitled to a reduction of $27,759 in its taxes, that notice of this determination had been served on plaintiff’s board of … Alexander, 87 Utah 376 [ 49 P.2d 408, 415-416 ] ; Estate of Quinn, 43 Cal.2d 785 , 787 [ 278 P.2d 692 ]; Koehn v. State Board of Equalization, 50 Cal.2d 432, 435-437 [ 326 P.2d 502 ].)

    Cited 36 timesPublished
  • People v. Fudge

    7 Cal. 4th 1075 · California Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1994

    (Hardy, supra, 2 Cal.4th at p. 205; see People v. Brown (1988) 46 Cal.3d 432, 447-448 [ 250 Cal.Rptr. 604 , 758 P.2d 1135 ].) … (People v. Brown (1993) 6 Cal.4th 322, 337 [ 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 710 , 862 P.2d 710 ]; People v. Lewis (1990) 50 Cal.3d 262, 287 [ 266 Cal.Rptr. 834 , 786 P.2d 892 ].)

    Cited 348 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.