Case law

In Re Richardson

15 Cal. 2d 536 · California Supreme Court · May 27, 1940

copy of the record of conviction of Jerome Lyman Richardson, in an action numbered 27812 in the District Court of the United States, in and for the Northern District of New York, entitled, “The United States of America v. … Shafer v. State Bar, 215 Cal. 706 [ 12 Pac. (2d) 957 ].”

California Canning Peach Growers v. Williams

11 Cal. 2d 233 · California Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1938

The cases cited by appellant—California Canning Peach Growers v. Downey, 76 Cal. App. 1 [ 243 Pac. 679 ]; California Canning Peach Growers v. Harris, 91 Cal. … App. 654 [ 267 Pac. 572 ]; California Canning Peach Growers v. Bardell & Oregoni, 132 Cal.

Renee J. v. Superior Court

110 Cal. Rptr. 2d 828 · California Supreme Court · Aug 16, 2001

Citing Board of Trustees v. … We agree generally that the presence or absence of commas is a factor to be considered in interpreting a statute (see Board of Trustees v.

Ex parte Miller

82 Cal. 454 · California Supreme Court · Jan 2, 1890

The principal ground of the application is, that the petitioner, upon a trial for a violation of an ordinance of the board of supervisors of Sutter County, was by the justice’s court denied a jury, and upon a trial by the … Law Mag. 789 et seq.; Ex parte Brandon, 45 Ark. 143 ; Tormey v. Barr, 75 Iowa, 758 ; Zelle v. McHenry, 51 Iowa, 572 ; Kelly v. People, 115 Ill. 583 ; 56 Am. Rep. 184 .)

J. L. Mott Iron Works v. West Coast Plumbing Supply Co.

113 Cal. 341 · California Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1896

I directed it to the board of trustees of the West Coast Plumbing Supply Company, and I probably put it on the desk there. I don’t know. Q. … The case of Norton v. Atchison etc. R. R. Co., 97 Cal. 388 ; 33 Am. St. Rep. 198 , is not in point.

Notten v. Mensing

3 Cal. 2d 469 · California Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1935

(See 5 Browne on Statute of Frauds, sec. 457a.) In the section last cited, Mr. … (Seymour v. Oelrichs, supra, p. 796 .) In Anderson v. Hubble, 93 Ind. 570, 576 [ 47 Am.

Ham v. Grapeland Irrigation District

172 Cal. 611 · California Supreme Court · May 25, 1916

(Montgomery v. Tutt, 11 Cal. 307 .) … (Hughson v. Crane, 115 Cal. 415 , [ 47 Pac. 120 ]; Stinson v. Alessandro Irr. Dist., 135 Cal. 389 , [ 67 Pac. 496, 1034 ]; Leeman v. Perris Irr. Dist., 140 Cal. 540 , [ 74 Pac. 24 ].)

StorMedia Inc. v. Superior Court

84 Cal. Rptr. 2d 843 · California Supreme Court · May 27, 1999

BROWN, J., Dissenting.—For the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Diamond Multimedia Systems, Inc. v.

Strouse v. Police Court

85 Cal. 49 · California Supreme Court · Jul 25, 1890

San Francisco, on April 24, 1890, charging the petitioner with a misdemeanor in having transacted and carried on the business of selling meat without having first taken out a license, as required by an ordinance of the board … (Levy v. Wilson, 69 Cal. 105 .) Application for writ denied. Sharpstein, J., McFarland, J., Fox, J., and Thornton, J., concurred.

North Bloomfield Gravel Mining Co. v. Keyser

58 Cal. 315 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1881

It arrests the proceedings of any tribunal, corporation, board, or person, where such proceedings are without or in excess of the jurisdiction of such tribunal, corporation, board, or person.” “ § 1103. … Co. v. Ells, 40 Ga. 87 . (See also, Ex parte Greene et al., 29 Ala. 52 ; Hutson v. Lowry, 2 Va. Cases, 42.)

Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc. v. Dana Corp.

22 Cal. Rptr. 3d 352 · California Supreme Court · Dec 23, 2004

Opinion BROWN, J. … The dissent relies on Aas v. Superior Court, supra, 24 Cal.4th 627 and the concurring and dissenting opinion of Justice Brown in Jimenez v.

Lawrence v. Doolan

68 Cal. 309 · California Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1885

As we understand the decision of this court in Randall v. … (People v. Edwards, 9 Cal. 292 .)

Crow v. Hildreth

39 Cal. 618 · California Supreme Court · Jul 5, 1870

A breach of the contract by the party bound to perform is an essential part of the cause of action, and must be alleged in the complaint ( Brown v. … This variance was fatal. ( Gregory v. Haworth , 25 Cal. 653 ; Seale v. Emerson, Id. 293; Gyle v. Schoenbar , 23 Id. 538; Stout v. Coffin , 28 Id. 65; Masten v. Griffing , 33 Id. 111; Hathaway v. Ryan , 35 Id. 188.)

Griffith v. State Bar

40 Cal. 2d 470 · California Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1953

Kelley-V anderbush and custody of their children. Mrs. … Kelley-V anderbush had been advised that a warrant for her arrest for bigamy had been issued.

Alhambra Addition Water Co. v. Richardson

72 Cal. 598 · California Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1887

But while this doctrine as to the effect of statutes of limitation still obtains with respect to rights resting in contract (McCormick v. Brown, 36 Cal. 184 ; Grant v. … Stockmon, 36 Cal. 540 ; San Francisco v. Fulde, 37 Cal. 352 ; *601 Williams v. Sutton, 43 Cal. 73 ; Sharp v. Blankenship, 59 Cal. 289 ; Johnson v. Brown, 63 Cal. 393 .)

Sullivan v. State Bar

52 Cal. 2d 747 · California Supreme Court · Oct 6, 1959

(Sullivan v. State Bar, 45 Cal.2d 112 [ 287 P.2d 778 ].) In a second proceeding, which involved proof of nine charges of similar misconduct, he was suspended for three years. (Sullivan v. … The Board of Governors thereafter recommended that he be disbarred.

Ernst v. Ganahl

166 Cal. 493 · California Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1913

Justice Melvin in Brown v. Mason, 155 Cal. 155 , [12 L. R. A. (N. S.) 328, 99 Pac. 867 ]. (See, also, Roper v. Rosenfeld, 145 Cal. 677, 678 , [ 79 Pac. 354 ] ; Sibbald v. Bethlehem etc. Co., 83 N. Y. 378 , [ 38 Am. … (See Brown v. Mason, 155 Cal. 155 , [12 L. R. A. (N. S.) 328, 99 Pac. 867 ]; Sibbald v. Bethlehem etc. Co., 83 *500 N. Y. 378, [ 38 Am. Rep. 441 ].)

Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.

32 Cal. Rptr. 3d 436 · California Supreme Court · Aug 11, 2005

(Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education (2005) 544 U.S. 167 [ 161 L.Ed.2d 361 , 125 S.Ct. 1497, 1508 ].) … Ser. (2d Cir. 1999) 180 F.3d 426, 446 ; Brown v. Brody (D.C. Cir. 1999) 339 U.S. App. D.C. 233 [ 199 F.3d 446, 458 ].)

Johnson v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.

154 Cal. 285 · California Supreme Court · Sep 11, 1908

A four-board fence skirted Hollister Avenue on the south. … Co. v. Miller, 98 Tex. 270 , [ 83 S. W. 182 ]; Singleton v. Southwestern R. R. Co., 70 Ga. 464 , [ 48 Am. Rep. 574 ]; Abbott v. Johnstown etc. R. R. Co., 80 N. Y. 27 , [ 36 Am. Rep. 572 ]; Railroad Co. v. Brown, 84 U.

Hoen v. Simmons

1 Cal. 119 · California Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1850

We think not, and so held in Harris v. Brown, (ante, p. 98.) There is no doubt about the correctness of that decision.