Case law

Stockton & Visalia Railroad v. City of Stockton

51 Cal. 328 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1876

Co. v. Commissioners of Lyons Co. (6 Nev. R. 71), cited by counsel, repugnant to these views. … We had a similar question before us in the case of the People v. Supervisors of Alameda ( 45 Cal. 395 ).

Gibson v. County of Mendocino

16 Cal. 2d 80 · California Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1940

(Meindersee v. Meyers, 188 Cal. 498 [ 205 Pac. 1078 ] ; Smith v. Southern Pac. Co., 201 Cal. 57 [ 255 Pac. 500 ] ; Hayward v. Downer, 65 Cal. App. 450 [ 224 Pac. 265 ].)” … (Watson v. City of Alameda, 219 Cal. 331 [ 26 Pac. (2d) 286 ] ; Meyer v. City of San Rafael, 22 Cal. App. (2d) 46, 48 [ 70 Pac. (2d) 533 ].)

San Marcos Water District v. San Marcos Unified School District

42 Cal. 3d 154 · California Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1986

(Spring Street Co. v. City of Los Angeles (1916) 170 Cal. 24, 29 .) The court in Solvang Mun. Improvement Dist. v. Board of Supervisors (1980) 112 Cal. … (Hoyt v. Board of Civil Service Commrs. (1942) 21 Cal.2d 399, 402 [ 132 P.2d 804 ].)

McDonald v. Agnew

122 Cal. 448 · California Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1898

In Vrooman v. … Respondent cites Deidesheimer v. Brown, 8 Cal. 339 ; Lyman v. Milton, 44 Cal. 630 , and Kent v.

Freeman v. River Farms Co.

5 Cal. 2d 431 · California Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1936

Co. v. Moore, 183 Cal. 497, 502 [ 191 Pac. 905 , 11 A. L. … (Winterfield v. Cream City B. Co., 96 Wis. 239 [ 71 N. W. 101 ].)”

Butte Co. v. Boydstun

2 Cal. Unrep. 699 · California Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1886

The question of necessity is settled by the board of supervisors, and, having so determined, it is not a question for the court to pass on: Tehama Co. v. Bryan, 68 Cal. 57 , 8 Pac. 673 . Judgment affirmed.

In Re Clark

51 Cal. 2d 838 · California Supreme Court · Apr 3, 1959

Brown, Attorney General, William E. James, Assistant Attorney General, James Don Keller, District Attorney (San Diego), and Claude B. Brown, Deputy District Attorney, for Respondent. McCOMB, J. … (People v. O'Donnell, 37 Cal.App. 192, 196 [ 174 P. 102 ].) Second.

Evarts v. Weise

176 Cal. 218 · California Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1917

See, also, Sweetser v. Pacheco, 172 Cal. 137 , [ 155 P. 639 ].) … The ballot was therefore properly counted for Weise. ( Turner v. Wilson, 171 Cal. 600 , [ 154 P. 2 ]; Sweetser v. Pacheco, 172 Cal. 137 , [ 155 P. 639 ].) 2.

Dore v. Southern Pac. Co.

163 Cal. 182 · California Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1912

The judgment of a majority of said board was to be conclusive. … The board of arbitration made an award, fixing the value of the respective parcels of land in question.

Lord v. Dunster

79 Cal. 477 · California Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1889

Van Horn, 9 Gal. 207; Saunders v. Haynes, 13 Cal. 152 ; Dorsey v. Barry, 24 Cal. 449 ; Casgrave v. Howland, 24 Cal. 457 ; Norwood v. Kenfield, 34 Cal. 332 ; Keller v. … The official returns of the board of supervisors gave Lord 140 votes in this precinct and Dunster 175 votes, a majority of 35 votes for Dunster.

Rideout v. City of Los Angeles

185 Cal. 426 · California Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1921

(Gibson v. Board of Supervisors, 80 Cal. 359 , [ 22 Pac. 225 ].) Being identical in nature and in points raised, the two cases were consolidated for trial. … (People v. Prewett, 124 Cal. 7 , [ 56 Pac. 619 ]; State v. Board of Supervisors , 35 N. J.

People v. Camacho

98 Cal. Rptr. 2d 232 · California Supreme Court · Jul 27, 2000

BROWN, J. I fully concur in the determination to affirm the Court of Appeal’s judgment reversing the denial of defendant’s suppression motion. … Woods (1999) 21 Cal.4th 668, 692-696 [ 88 Cal.Rptr.2d 88 , 981 P.2d 1019 ] (dis. opn. of Brown, J.); see also Comment, Fourth Amendment Protection for Juvenile Probationers in California, Slim or None?

Townsend v. State Bar

210 Cal. 362 · California Supreme Court · Sep 30, 1930

In Alpers *365 v. Hunt, 86 Cal. 78, 88 [ 21 Am. St. Rep. 17 , 9 L. R. … The recommendation of the Board of Governors is that petitioner be suspended for the period of one year and we are disposed to adopt that recommendation.

American Airlines, Inc. v. County of San Mateo

12 Cal. 4th 1110 · California Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1996

(Western Air Lines v. Board of Equalization, supra, 480 U.S. at p. 131 [94 L.Ed.2d at pp. 120-121] [relying on legislative history of 4-R Act in interpreting former § 1513(d)]; Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc. v. … (Western Air Lines v. Board of Equalization (1987) 480 U.S. 123, 125 [ 94 L.Ed.2d 112, 116-117 , 107 S.Ct. 1038 ]; State Bd. of Equal, v. American Airlines, Inc. (Colo. 1989) 773 P.2d 1033, 1034-1035, fn. 1 .)

Consolidated Rock Products Co. v. City of Los Angeles

57 Cal. 2d 515 · California Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1962

(Miller v. Board of Public Works, supra, p. 486.) … (See Rubin v. Board of Directors, 16 Cal.2d 119, 126 [ 104 P.2d 1041 ].)

Pacific Ready-Cut Homes, Inc. v. Seeber

205 Cal. 690 · California Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1928

Brown, and C. W. Brown as owners, respectively, in said actions. H. … Co. v.

Vannucci v. Pedrini

217 Cal. 138 · California Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1932

Bank v. Sadler, 1 Cal. App. 189, 197 [ 81 Pac. 1029 ].) Many authorities from other jurisdictions are to the same effect. (Sterling Loan & Investment Co. v. Litel, 75 Colo. 34 [ 223 Pac. 753 ]; Nicholson v. … Cas. 699] ; Moses v. Soule, 63 Misc. Rep. 203 [ 118 N. Y. Supp. 410 ]; Bloomingdale et al. v. Bloomingdale et ux., 107 Misc. Rep. 646 [ 177 N. Y. Supp. 873 ]; Baumohl v. Goldstein, 95 N. J.

Renee J. v. Superior Court

110 Cal. Rptr. 2d 828 · California Supreme Court · Aug 16, 2001

Citing Board of Trustees v. … We agree generally that the presence or absence of commas is a factor to be considered in interpreting a statute (see Board of Trustees v.

People v. Searcey

121 Cal. 1 · California Supreme Court · May 28, 1898

The sections of the code declaring what that duty is evidently either have not been closely studied by the board, or no real effort has been made to follow the law there laid down. … The principle justifying such a course is well outlined in People v. Wells, 100 Cal. 459 .

Anstead v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.

201 Cal. 198 · California Supreme Court · May 4, 1927

In the case of Brown v. … In Stoner v. Security Trust Co., 47 Cal.