Case law

O'Keefe v. South End Rowing Club

64 Cal. 2d 729 · California Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1966

(Accord, Smith v. Kern County Land Co. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 205, 208 [ 331 P.2d 645 ]; Speece v. Browne (1964) 229 Cal.App.2d 487, 490-491 [ 40 Cal.Rptr. 384 ]; Clawson v. Stockton Golf etc. … E.g., section 13 of article V provides: “In addition to the powers and duties elsewhere in these By-Laws prescribed, the Board of Directors shall: . . . L.

City of Oakland v. Oakland Water Front Co.

118 Cal. 160 · California Supreme Court · Sep 13, 1897

R. v. … In Ward v.

Wilson v. Superior Court

21 Cal. 3d 816 · California Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1978

This is consistent with our approach in other due process cases such as Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565 (1975); Board of Regents v. Roth, [(1972) 408 U.S. 564 ( 33 L.Ed.2d 548 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 )]; Perry v. … Gee v. Brown (1975) 14 Cal.3d 571, 575, fn. 3 [ 122 Cal.Rptr. 231 , 536 P.2d 1017 ].)

Golding v. R.K.O. Pictures, Inc.

35 Cal. 2d 690 · California Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1950

The captain, sure of his authority, informs the accuser that he is free to try to convince anyone on board ship of the truth of his suspicions. … Universal Pictures Corp., 45 F.2d 119, 122 ; Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp., 81 F.2d 49, 54 ; De Acosta v. Brown, 146 F.2d 408, 410 ; Echevarria v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc., 12 F. Supp. 632, 635 ; Fendler v.

Paso Robles War Memorial Hospital District v. Negley

29 Cal. 2d 203 · California Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1946

(Joint Highway District No. 13 v. Hinman, 220 Cal. 578, 586 [32 P.2d 144]; Stuckenbruck v. Board of Supervisors, 193 Cal. 506 [ 225 P. 857 ] ; Anaheim Sugar Co. v. … Board of Education, 140 Cal. 554 [ 74 P. 44 ]; Galt County Water District v.

Blankenship v. Whaley

142 Cal. 566 · California Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1904

If defendants took with knowledge of plaintiff's right, the other findings of the court clearly establish that this right was *568 sufficient to entitle plaintiff to an execution of .the parol agreement. ” (Blankenship v. … He advised her of the necessity for the work, and, as she testified, told her that he had asked plaintiff, Hudson, and Brown to assist him in the matter, “and they could get water in their turn.”

Carr v. River & Eureka Railroad

21 L.R.A. 354 · California Supreme Court · May 30, 1893

Such was the case of Filer v. New York C. R. R. Co., 49 N. Y. 47 ; 10 Am. … (See also Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Miles, 88 Ala. 256 ; Nichols v. Dubuque & Dakota R’y Co., 68 Iowa, 732 ; Pennsylvania Co. v. Marion, 123 Ind. 422 ; 18 Am. S±. Rep. 330.)

Williams v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit Authority

68 Cal. 2d 599 · California Supreme Court · May 17, 1968

Co. of Newark, N.J. v. Diskin (1967) 255 Cal. App.2d 502, 510 [ 63 Cal.Rptr. 177 ].) Frost v. … rejection thereof by such Board.”

Mappin v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

198 Cal. 733 · California Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1926

(Breske v. Minneapolis etc. Ry. Co., 115 Minn. 386 [ 132 N. W. 337 ].) The case of Chicago Junction Ry. Co. v. Industrial Board, etc., 277 Ill. 512 [ 115 N. … Co. v. Industrial Board, 277 Ill. 512 [ 115 N. E. 647 ], which is one of the eases upon which the appellant herein most strongly relies.

Tu-Vu Drive-In Corp. v. Ashkins

61 Cal. 2d 283 · California Supreme Court · May 5, 1964

At a meeting on October 14, 1960, the board ordered that the written assent of the majority stockholder adopting the bylaw be filed in the corporate minute book. … Spencer v.

Lehn v. City of San Francisco

66 Cal. 76 · California Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1884

(Guerrin v. San Francisco, No. 6090 ; Jessup v. San Francisco, No. 6842.) 2. Section 4072 of the Political Code is inapplicable to the city and county of San Francisco. (Pol. C. 4087.) … In People v.

People v. Lucky

45 Cal. 3d 259 · California Supreme Court · May 16, 1988

(California v. Brown, supra, 479 U.S. at p. 546 [ 93 L.Ed.2d at p. 943 (conc. opn. of O’Connor, J.)].) … Brown, supra, 40 Cal.3d at p. 542 , and fn. 13; see also Caldwell v. Mississippi (1985) 472 U.S. 320, 328-329 [ 86 L.Ed.2d 231, 239 , 105 S.Ct. 2633 ].) In People v.

In Re Calhoun

17 Cal. 3d 75 · California Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1976

Thus, in People v. … Younger v.

In re Hawk

21 Cal. 3d 592 · California Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1978

The board then recommended that Hawk be suspended from the practice of law for two months. … (See Segretti v. State Bar (1976) 15 Cal.3d 878, 891 [ 126 Cal.Rptr. 793 , 544 P.2d 929 ].) *594 It is ordered that Richard E.

In Re the Estate of Hayne

165 Cal. 568 · California Supreme Court · Jun 5, 1913

(Fellows v. Little, 46 N. H. 27; Brown v. Brown, 16 Vt. 197 ; Weatherhead v. Field, 26 Vt. 665 ; Bulkeley v. Noble, 19 Mass. 337 ; Clark v. Warner, 6 Conn. 355 ; Bayles v. Baker, 5 R. I. 460; Wilkinson v. … (Elliott v. Western C. M. Co., 243 Ill. 614 , [134 Am. St. Rep. *575 398, 17 Ann. Cas. 884, 90 N. E. 1104 ]; Sherwood v. Smith, 23 Conn. 521 ; Bradshear v. Cannady, 76 N. C. 448 ; Mitchell v.

Stowell v. Rialto Irrigation Dist.

155 Cal. 215 · California Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1909

Similarly, in Stimson v. … (Township of Rock Creek v. Strong, 96 U. S. 271 ; Dows v. Town of Elmwood, 34 Fed. 114 ; City of South St. Paul v. Lamprecht Bros. Co., 88 Fed. 449 ; Yesler v. City of Seattle, 1 Wash.

Gibson v. County of Mendocino

16 Cal. 2d 80 · California Supreme Court · Aug 21, 1940

(Meindersee v. Meyers, 188 Cal. 498 [ 205 Pac. 1078 ] ; Smith v. Southern Pac. Co., 201 Cal. 57 [ 255 Pac. 500 ] ; Hayward v. Downer, 65 Cal. App. 450 [ 224 Pac. 265 ].)” … (Watson v. City of Alameda, 219 Cal. 331 [ 26 Pac. (2d) 286 ] ; Meyer v. City of San Rafael, 22 Cal. App. (2d) 46, 48 [ 70 Pac. (2d) 533 ].)

Perez v. Sharp

32 Cal. 2d 711 · California Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1948

Gaines v. Canada, 305 U.S. 337, 351 [ 59 S.Ct. 232 , 83 L.Ed. 208 ]; Sipuel v. Board of Regents, 332 U.S. 631 [ 68 S.Ct. 299 , 92 L.Ed. -].) … (Sipuel v. Board of Regents, 332 U.S. 631 [ 68 S.Ct. 299 , 92 L.Ed. -], [16 U.S. Law Week 4090]; Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada, 305 U.S. 337, 350-351 [ 59 S.Ct. 232 , 83 L.Ed. 208 ].)

People v. Ruster

16 Cal. 3d 690 · California Supreme Court · Apr 14, 1976

Proc., § 1859; Mercer v. Perez (1968) 68 Cal.2d 104, 112 [ 65 Cal.Rptr. 315 , 436 P.2d 315 ]; Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ].) … (Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal., supra; Stafford v. L. A. etc. Retirement Board (1954) 42 Cal.2d 795, 799 [ 270 P.2d 12 ]; County of Los Angeles v. Frisbie (1942) 19 Cal.2d 634, 639 [ 122 P.2d 526 ].)

Aguilar v. Avis Rent a Car System, Inc.

87 Cal. Rptr. 2d 132 · California Supreme Court · Aug 2, 1999

“This court has declared that policy to be ‘fundamental.’ ” (Brown v. Superior Court (1984) 37 Cal.3d 477, 485 [ 208 Cal.Rptr. 724 , 691 P.2d 272 ].) … (Brown v. Superior Court, supra, 37 Cal.3d at p. 486 .) One form of employment discrimination is harassment on the basis of race or national origin.