Case law

Eustace v. Jahns

38 Cal. 3 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1869

(Crayton v. Munger, 9 Texas, 292 ; Able v. Chandler, 12 Id. 92.) … Lane, 1 Sand. 216, note 1; People v. Gibbs, 9 Wend. 29 .)

Williams v. City of Los Angeles

47 Cal. 3d 195 · California Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1988

Healthy City Board of Ed. v. Doyle (1977) 429 U.S. 274, 283-287 [ 50 L.Ed.2d 471, 481-484 , 97 S.Ct. 568 ]; Bekiaris v. Board of Education (1972) 6 Cal.3d 575, 592-594 [ 100 Cal.Rptr. 16 , 493 P.2d 480 ]; Allen v. … Healthy City Board of Ed. v. Doyle, supra, 429 U.S. at pp. 285-286 [ 50 L.Ed.2d at p. 483 ].)

Mitton v. State Bar

71 Cal. 2d 525 · California Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1969

The burden is upon one seeking a review of a recommendation of the disciplinary board to show that its findings are not supported by the evidence or that its recom *527 mendation is erroneous or unlawful. (Corn v. … In one proceeding, this court suspended petitioner for three months (Mitton v. State Bar, 49 Cal.2d 686 [ 321 P.2d 13]); in the other he was privately reproved by the Board of Governors.

Estate of Cornelious

35 Cal. 3d 461 · California Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1984

(See Kusior v. Silver, supra, 54 Cal.2d 603 ; County of San Diego v. Brown, supra, 80 Cal. App.3d 297 ; In re Marriage of B. (1981) 124 Cal. App.3d 524 [ 177 Cal. Rptr. 429 ]; Vincent B. v. Joan R. (1981) 126 Cal. … This pronouncement is apparently based on two decisions of the Court of Appeal: County of San Diego v. Brown, supra, 80 Cal. App.3d 297 and S.D.W. v. Holden, supra, 275 Cal. App.2d 313 .

People v. Robinson

36 Cal. Rptr. 3d 760 · California Supreme Court · Dec 15, 2005

Brown (2004) 33 Cal.4th 382, 396-398 [ 15 Cal.Rptr.3d 624 , 93 P.3d 244 ] (Brown II); People v. Pollock (2004) 32 Cal.4th 1153, 1181 [ 13 Cal.Rptr.3d 34 , 89 P.3d 353 ] (Pollock); People v. … (See, e.g., People v. Brown, supra, 31 Cal.4th at pp. 567-568; People v. Lawley, supra, 27 Cal.4th at p. 166; People v. Hines, supra, 15 Cal.4th at p. 1068; People v. Sanchez, supra, 12 Cal.4th at p. 77 .) b.

Kelson v. State Bar

17 Cal. 3d 1 · California Supreme Court · May 27, 1976

The board adopted both the committee’s findings of fact and its recommendation for discipline. … , the ultimate determination rests with this court (Toll v.

Hamilton v. State Bar

23 Cal. 3d 868 · California Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1979

(Sodikoff v. State Bar (1975) 14 Cal.3d 422, 431 [ 121 Cal.Rptr. 467 , 535 P.2d 311 ].) Discipline The unanimous recommendation of the disciplinary board is that petitioner be disbarred. … In making its recommendation the disciplinary board properly considered petitioner’s record of three prior disciplinary proceedings.

Warfield v. Peninsula Golf & Country Club

10 Cal. 4th 594 · California Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1995

In Tillman v. … Rotary Club of Duarte v. Board of Directors, supra, 178 Cal. App.3d 1035, 1055-1058 ; United States Jaycees v. McClure, supra, 305 N.W.2d 764, 768-769 .)

Dillon v. Municipal Court

4 Cal. 3d 860 · California Supreme Court · May 17, 1971

In Hague v. … (Blumenthal v. Board of Medical Examiners (1962) 57 Cal.2d 228, 238 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 501 , 368 P.2d 101 ].)

Brainard v. De La Montanya

18 Cal. 2d 502 · California Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1941

(First National Bank v. Frazier, 143 Ore. 662 [ 19 Pac. (2d) 1091 , 22 Pac. (2d) 325 ]; National Bank v. Puget Sound Biscuit Co., 61 Wash. 192 [ 112 Pac. 265 ]; Longmont Supply Ditch Co. v. … Coffman, 11 Colo. 551 [ 19 Pac. 508 ]; Miller v. South Hills Lumber & Supply Co., 334 Pa. 293 [6 Atl. (2d) 92]; Baker v. Smith, 41 R.

Peterson v. Superior Court

31 Cal. 3d 147 · California Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1982

Morez, for example, the court retroactively applied Brown v. … (See Conti v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners (1969) 1 Cal.3d 351, 359 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 337 , 461 P.2d 617 ]; Gerhard v. Stephens (1968) 68 Cal.2d 864, 904 [ 69 Cal.Rptr. 612 , 442 P.2d 692 ].)

Committee on Children's Television, Inc. v. General Foods Corp.

35 Cal. 3d 197 · California Supreme Court · Dec 22, 1983

Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown & Baerwitz (1976) 57 Cal.App.3d 104, 109 [ 128 Cal.Rptr. 901 ]; Lavine v. Jessup (1958) 161 Cal.App.2d 59, 69 [ 326 P.2d 238 ].) 17 The specificity requirement serves two purposes. … (Lavine v. Jessup, supra, 161 Cal.App.2d 59, 69 ; see Roberts v. Ball, Hunt, Hart, Brown & Baerwitz, supra, 57 Cal.App.3d 104, 109 ; Scafidi v. Western Loan & Bldg. Co. (1946) 72 Cal.App.2d 550, 553 [ 165 P.2d 260 ].)

Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.

24 Cal. 3d 458 · California Supreme Court · May 31, 1979

Cir. 1969) 417 F.2d 1161 ; Society for Individual Rights, Inc. v. Hampton (N.D. Cal. 1973) 63 F.R.D. 399 ; Saal v. Middendorf (N.D. Cal. 1977) 427 F.Supp. 192, 199-203 ; Martinez v. Brown (N.D. … (See, e.g., Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board (1941) 313 U.S. 177, 191-192 [ 85 L.Ed. 1271, 1281-1282 . 61 S.Ct. 845 , 133 A.L.R. 1217 ]: and N.L.R.B. v.

Williams v. Chino Valley Independent Fire District

61 Cal. 4th 97 · California Supreme Court · May 4, 2015

(Brown v. Lucky Stores, Inc., supra, 246 F.3d at p. 1190.) In Martin v. … (Brown v. Lucky Stores, Inc., supra, 246 F.3d at p. 1190.)

Hildebrand v. State Bar

36 Cal. 2d 504 · California Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1950

State Bar, 217 Cal. 47 [ 17 P.2d 112 ]; Burke v. State Bar, 218 Cal. 143 [ 21 P.2d 577 ]; Herrscher v. … (Hildebrand v. State Bar, 18 Cal.2d 816 [ 117 P.2d 860 ]; Ryan v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 268 Ill.App. 364 ; In re Seidman, 228 App.Div. 515 [ 240 N.Y.S. 592 ].)

Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.

61 Cal. 2d 659 · California Supreme Court · Aug 20, 1964

Chase Lumber Co. v. Railroad Com. (1931) 212 Cal. 691, 706 [ 300 P. 12 ]; Bacich v. Board of Control (1943) 23 Cal.2d 343, 349 [ 144 P.2d 818 ].) … (See Rose v. State, supra, 19 Cal.2d 713 ; Bacich v. Board of Control, supra, 23 Cal.2d 343 .)

People v. Villatoro

54 Cal. 4th 1152 · California Supreme Court · Jul 30, 2012

(See Isobe v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Board (1974) 12 Cal.3d 584, 590-591 [ 116 Cal.Rptr. 376 , 526 P.2d 528 ].) … (See Isobe v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Board, supra, 12 Cal.3d at pp. 590-591.)

Banks v. Civil Service Commission

10 Cal. 435 · California Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1937

Their objection was overruled and plaintiffs now assign this action of the court as erroneous, relying upon the case of King v. Leavy, 124 Cal. … In the case of Francis v. Leavy, 131 Cal.

Kim v. Reins Internat. Cal., Inc.

California Supreme Court · Mar 12, 2020

(Arias, at p. 986; Brown v. Ralphs Grocery Co. (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 489, 501 (Brown).) … (Common Cause v. Board of Supervisors (1989) 49 Cal.3d 432, 439.) When, as here, a cause of action is based on statute, standing rests on the provision’s language, its underlying purpose, and the legislative intent.

In Re the Estate of Stewart

174 Cal. 547 · California Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1917

(Hart v. Taber, 161 Cal. 20 , [118 Pac. 252]; Humboldt Sav, Bank v. McCleverty, 161 Cal. 285 , [ 119 Pac. 82 ]; Wall v. Brown, 162 Cal. 307 , [ 122 Pac. 478 ].)