Case law

Farrar v. the State Bar

1 Cal. 2d 359 · California Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1934

This is a proceeding to review the action of the board of governors of The State Bar of California recommending suspension of the petitioner Mercer H. … (Ring v. State Bar, 218 Cal. 747 [ 24 Pac. (2d) 821 ].)

Ex parte Kearny

55 Cal. 212 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1880

As was said by Campbell, J., in Jackson v. … (Jolley v. Foltz, 34 Cal. 321 .)

Hoffman-Marks Co. v. Spires

154 Cal. 111 · California Supreme Court · Aug 8, 1908

Third payment, the sum of $1227.45, when the building is inclosed, brown coated and rough plumbed. … MeKown & Co. commenced to build said house and progressed to the point when said building was inclosed, brown coated, and rough plumbed.

Markwort v. McGee

36 Cal. 2d 592 · California Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1951

But doubt was cast thereon by McGregor v. Board of Trustees, 159 Cal. 441 [ 114 P. 566 ] and Carter v. … Board of Trustees, supra; Dawson v. Superior Court, 13 Cal.App. 582 [ 110 P. 479 ]).

Richey v. Autonation, Inc.

60 Cal. 4th 909 · California Supreme Court · Jan 29, 2015

(See, e.g., Board of Education v. … Name of Opinion Richey v.

Dillard v. City of Los Angeles

20 Cal. 2d 599 · California Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1942

(Casserly v. City of Oakland, 215 Cal. 600, 603 [ 12 P. (2d) 425 ]; Klench v. Board of Pension Fund Commrs., 79 Cal. App. 171 [ 249 Pac. 46 ]; O’Dea v. Cook, 176 Cal. 659 [ 169 Pac. 366 ]; Aitken v. Roche, 48 Cal. … (Buckley v. Roche, 214 Cal. 241 [ 4 P. (2d) 929]; Peters v. Sacramento City E. R. System, 27 Cal. App. (2d) 10 [ 80 P. (2d) 179 ]; Naughton v. Retirement Board of S. F., 43 Cal. App. (2d) 254 [ 110 P. (2d) 714 ].)

Becker v. Becker

36 Cal. 2d 324 · California Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1950

(Codorniz v. Codorniz, 34 Cal.2d 811 [ 215 P.2d 32 ]; Leupe v. Leupe, 21 Cal.2d 145 [ 130 P.2d 697 ]; Adams v. Adams, 29 Cal.2d 621 [ 177 P.2d 265 ]; Dupont v. Dupont, 4 Cal.2d 227 [ 48 P.2d 677 ]; Ettlinger v. … (Green v. Green, 66 Cal.App.2d 50, 57 [ 151 P.2d 679 ]; Lorraine v. Lorraine, supra; Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 1 [ 147 P. 1168 ].) For the foregoing reasons the order appealed from is reversed. Gibson, C.

Moore v. State Bar

62 Cal. 2d 74 · California Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1964

(Schullman v. State Bar (1963) 59 Cal.2d 590, 599-600 [3, 4] [ 30 Cal.Rptr. 834 , 381 P.2d 658 ].) … Code, §§ 6106, 6067; see Call v. State Bar (1955) 45 Cal.2d 104, 109 [2-3], 111 [6] [ 287 P.2d 761 ]; Rock v. State Bar (1962) 57 Cal.2d 639, 643-644 [3] [ 21 Cal.Rptr. 572 , 371 P.2d 308 , 96 A.L.R.2d 818 ].)

Holland v. Hotchkiss

162 Cal. 366 · California Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1912

Millikan, 99 Ind. 355 ; Knox v. Dunn, 22 Kan. 683 ; Brown v. Finley, 51 Neb. 468 , [ 71 N. W. 34 ] ; Dillon v. Merrian, 22 Neb. 152 , [ 34 N. W. 344 ]; Wood v Helmer, 10 Neb. 65 , [ 4 N. W. 968 ]; Boeck v. … (Jamison v. Jamison, 3. Whart. 471, [ 31 Am. Dec. 536 ]; McIntire v. Board, 5 Binn. 296 , [ 6 Am. Dec. 417 ]; Halls v. Thompson, 1 Sm. & M. (Miss.) 443, 489; Davar v. Cardwell, 27 Ind. 478 ; Woodruff v.

People v. Robertson

17 Cal. Rptr. 3d 604 · California Supreme Court · Aug 19, 2004

Reluctantly, I conclude the merger doctrine (People v. … it may be ripe for reexamination, as Justice Panelli (People v.

Mills v. Sargent

36 Cal. 379 · California Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1868

term of two years from the first Monday of March, 1868, against Sargent, who, at the same election was regularly elected Treasurer and' ex officio Tax Collector for a similar term, in pursuance of a proclamation of the Board … (Rynerson v. Kelsey, 34 Cal. 470 .) It is now claimed by appellant, that the necessary result is, that the whole Act is unconstitutional.

American Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Leeds

68 Cal. 2d 611 · California Supreme Court · May 27, 1968

Mills v. Brown (1928) 205 Cal. 38, 40 [ 269 P. 636 ]), or upon pleading and proof that the security is valueless. (See Roseleaf Corp. v. … (Bargioni v. Hill (1963) 59 Cal.2d 121, 123 [ 28 Cal.Rptr. 321 , 378 P.2d 593 ] ; Roseleaf v. Chicrighino, supra, 59 Cal.2d 35, 42 ; Brown v. Jensen (1953) 41 Cal.2d 193, 197-198 [ 259 P.2d 425 ].)

Moore v. Regents of University of California

51 Cal. 3d 120 · California Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1990

For example, in Brown v. … (Brown v. Superior Court, supra, 44 Cal.3d at pp. 1054-1055.)

People v. Williams

44 Cal. 3d 1127 · California Supreme Court · Apr 11, 1988

As we held in People v. … Brown The jury was given the unadorned former CALJIC No. 8.84.2 instructions on its weighing and decisionmaking process. As we explained in Allen , our concern in People v.

Hughes v. City of Los Angeles

168 Cal. 764 · California Supreme Court · Dec 11, 1914

Rep. 881] ; Crutcher v. Kentucky, 141 U. S. 47 , [ 35 L. Ed. 649 , 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 851]; Leloup v. Port of Mobile, 127 U. S. 640 , [ 32 L. Ed. 311 , 8 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1383] ; Robbins v. … Rep. 592]; Brennan v. Titusville, 153 U. S. 289 , [ 38 L. Ed. 719 , 14 Sup. Ct. Rep. 829]; Brown v. Maryland, 25 U. S. (12 Wheat.) 444 , [ 6 L. Ed. 678 ]; State v. Scott, 98 Tenn. 254 , [36 L. R. A. 461, 39 *766 S.

Bakkenson v. Superior Court

197 Cal. 504 · California Supreme Court · Dec 1, 1925

Co. v. … In the case of Signal Hill v.

Visalia & Tulare Railroad v. Hyde

110 Cal. 632 · California Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1895

(Morawetz on Corporations, sec. 159; Cook on Stock and Stockholders, sec. 256; Hall v. United States Ins. Co., 5 Gill, 484 ; Hartford etc. R. R. Co. v. Boorman, 12 Conn. 530 ; Upton v. … Co. v. Bagley, 14 Mich. 501 .)

Lyle v. WARNER BROTHERS TELEVISION PRODUCTION

16 Cal. Rptr. 3d 331 · California Supreme Court · Jul 21, 2004

16 Cal.Rptr.3d 331 (2004) 94 P.3d 476 LYLE v. WARNER BROTHERS TELEVISION PRODUCTION et al. No. S125171. Supreme Court of California. July 21, 2004. … GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN, and MORENO, JJ., concur.

Parker v. Colburn

196 Cal. 169 · California Supreme Court · May 21, 1925

Board, 242 Mass. 194 [136 N. E. *177 245]; Storer v. Downey, 215 Mass. 273 [ 102 N. E. 321 ].) … Zoning regulations are promulgated in the exercise of that power (Miller v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 477 [38 A. L. R. 1479, 234 Pac. 381 ]).

People v. Proctor

4 Cal. 4th 499 · California Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1992

(People v. Hamilton, supra, 45 Cal.3d at pp. 370-371; People v. Brown, supra, 40 Cal.3d at pp. 540-544.) … (People v. Hamilton, supra, 45 Cal.3d 351, 371 ; People v. Brown, supra, 40 Cal.3d at p. 544, fn. 17 .)