Case law

Miller v. Newton

23 Cal. 554 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1863

Sec. 1400; Peacock v. Monk, 2 Ves. Sr. 190; Huline v. Tenant, 1 Brown, 17; Owen v. Dickenson, 1 Craig & Phillips, 48 ; Murray v. Barlee, 3 Mylne & Kune, 208, 223; Jaques v. Methodist Episcopal Church, 17 J. … (Jaques v. M. E. Church, 17 Johns. 579 ; Evans v. Llewellyn, 2 Brown’s C. C. 150.)

In Re the Estate of Peabody

154 Cal. 173 · California Supreme Court · Aug 19, 1908

(Estate of Sanford, 136 Cal. 98 , [ 68 Pac. 494 ]; Sacramento Bank v. Montgomery, 146 Cal. 745 , [ 81 Pac. 138 ]; Estate of Dixon, 143 Cal. 513 , [77 Pac. 412]; Hofsas v. … See, also, Estate of Bennett, 134 Cal. 322 , [ 66 Pac. 370 ]; Richardson v. Noyes, 2 Mass. 60 , [3 Am. Dec. 24]; Homer v. Shelton, 43 Mass. 198 ; Brimmer v. Sohier, 55 Mass. 129 ; Carr v. Green, 2 McCord (S.

Schaefer v. State Bar

212 Cal. 367 · California Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1931

Besides, in the recent ease of In re Herron v. … After questioning petitioner, the board of governors recommended the increased penalty of six months’ suspension.

Cotton-Macauley Co. v. Deshields

188 Cal. 102 · California Supreme Court · Feb 2, 1922

'(Cotton-Macauley Co. v.. DeShields et al., 52 Cal. App. 469 [ 198 Pac. 1026 ].) … Whether or not the contract of July 6, 1920, was made by the board of supervisors without authority, and is therefore void, is not a problem in the case.

Watson v. City of Alameda

219 Cal. 331 · California Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1933

See, e. g., Dawson v. Tulare Union High School, 98 Cal. App. 138 [ 276 Pac. 424 ] ; Boyce v. San Diego High School District, 215 Cal. 293 [ 10 Pac. (2d) 62 ] ; see, also, Benton v. City of Santa Monica, 106 Cal. … (See Benton v. City of Santa Monica, supra; Crone v. City of El Cajon, 133 Cal. App. 624 [ 24 Pac. (2d) 846 ].)

Metropolitan Water District v. Superior Court

2 Cal. 2d 4 · California Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1934

(He nshaw v. Foster, 176 Cal. 507 [ 169 Pac. 82 ] ; City of Pasadena v. Chamberlain, 204 Cal. 643 [ 269 Pac. 630 ] ; Wheatley v. Superior Court, 207 Cal. 722 [ 279 Pac. 989 ].) … Under the cases of Tocque v. Superior Court, supra, and City of San Diego v.

Hotaling v. Montieth

128 Cal. 556 · California Supreme Court · May 9, 1900

(Daw v. Niles, 104 Cal. 106 ; Harrelson v. Tomich, 107 Cal. 627 .) … In Woodward v. Brown, 119 Cal. 309 , 63 Am. St.

Blood v. La Serena Land & Water Co.

113 Cal. 221 · California Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1896

of the corporation, its board of directors. … (Gashwiler v. Willis, 33 Cal. 12 ; 91 Am. Dec. 607 ; Alta Silver Min. Co. v. Alta Placer Min. Co., 78 Cal. 629 .)

Dyer v. Hudson

2 Cal. Unrep. 149 · California Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1882

The point decided in Beveridge v. Livingstone, 54 Cal. 54 , will not be considered on this appeal: Code Civ. Proc., sec. 659, subd. 3. … The time for doing the work may be extended by the board, but the board may not anticipate the extension when the original award is made.

Holland v. Hotchkiss

162 Cal. 366 · California Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1912

Millikan, 99 Ind. 355 ; Knox v. Dunn, 22 Kan. 683 ; Brown v. Finley, 51 Neb. 468 , [ 71 N. W. 34 ] ; Dillon v. Merrian, 22 Neb. 152 , [ 34 N. W. 344 ]; Wood v Helmer, 10 Neb. 65 , [ 4 N. W. 968 ]; Boeck v. … (Jamison v. Jamison, 3. Whart. 471, [ 31 Am. Dec. 536 ]; McIntire v. Board, 5 Binn. 296 , [ 6 Am. Dec. 417 ]; Halls v. Thompson, 1 Sm. & M. (Miss.) 443, 489; Davar v. Cardwell, 27 Ind. 478 ; Woodruff v.

People v. Robinson

36 Cal. Rptr. 3d 760 · California Supreme Court · Dec 15, 2005

Brown (2004) 33 Cal.4th 382, 396-398 [ 15 Cal.Rptr.3d 624 , 93 P.3d 244 ] (Brown II); People v. Pollock (2004) 32 Cal.4th 1153, 1181 [ 13 Cal.Rptr.3d 34 , 89 P.3d 353 ] (Pollock); People v. … (See, e.g., People v. Brown, supra, 31 Cal.4th at pp. 567-568; People v. Lawley, supra, 27 Cal.4th at p. 166; People v. Hines, supra, 15 Cal.4th at p. 1068; People v. Sanchez, supra, 12 Cal.4th at p. 77 .) b.

Petaluma Paving Co. v. Singley

136 Cal. 616 · California Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1902

(Martin v. Matfield, 49 Cal. 42 ; Bode v. Lee, 102 Cal. 586 ; Evans v. Paige, 102 Cal. 132 ; Pierce v. Willis, 103 Cal. 93 ; Hall v. Susskind, 120 Cal. 559 .) … (Finlayson’s Street Law, pp. 116-117; Fanning v. Leviston, 93 Cal. 188 ; Warren v. Riddell, 106 Cal. 352 ; Perine v. Forbush, 97 Cal. 162 .) We advise that the order appealed from be reversed.

Kelson v. State Bar

17 Cal. 3d 1 · California Supreme Court · May 27, 1976

The board adopted both the committee’s findings of fact and its recommendation for discipline. … , the ultimate determination rests with this court (Toll v.

Morgan v. State Bar

51 Cal. 3d 598 · California Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1990

(People v. Merchants Protective Corp. (1922) 189 Cal. 531, 535 [ 209 P. 363 ], quoting Eley v. Miller (1893) 7 Ind.App. 529 [ 34 N.E. 836 ]; see also Arm v. … He was a founder of the Challengers Boys’ Club, an organization designed to serve underprivileged boys, and served on its board of directors.

Muzzy Ranch Co. v. Solano County Airport Land Use Commission

41 Cal. 4th 372 · California Supreme Court · Jun 21, 2007

(Fullerton Joint Union High School Dist. v. State Bd. of Education (1982) 32 Cal.3d 779, 794-795 [ 187 Cal.Rptr. 398 , 654 P.2d 168 ], questioned on another point in Board of Supervisors v. … (Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 564, fn. 3 [ 276 Cal.Rptr. 410 , 801 P.2d 1161 ].)

Richey v. Autonation, Inc.

60 Cal. 4th 909 · California Supreme Court · Jan 29, 2015

(See, e.g., Board of Education v. … Name of Opinion Richey v.

Farrar v. the State Bar

1 Cal. 2d 359 · California Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1934

This is a proceeding to review the action of the board of governors of The State Bar of California recommending suspension of the petitioner Mercer H. … (Ring v. State Bar, 218 Cal. 747 [ 24 Pac. (2d) 821 ].)

Pacific Rock & Gravel Co. v. City of Upland

67 Cal. 2d 666 · California Supreme Court · Nov 14, 1967

Dean v. Board of Supervisors (1898) 122 Cal. 421, 423 [ 55 P. 131 ] ; Truchee & Tahoe T. Road Co. v. Campbell (1872) 44 Cal. 89 , 91 ; Fall v. County of Sutter (1862) 21 Cal. 237 , 252-253 ; Monarch Cablevision, Inc. v. … City Council (1966) 239 Cal.App.2d 206, 210 [2b] [ 48 Cal.Rptr. 550 ] ; see also Newsom v. Board of Supervisors (1928) 205 Cal. 262, 271 [ 270 P. 676 ].)

Catholic Charities of Sacramento, Inc. v. Superior Court

10 Cal. Rptr. 3d 283 · California Supreme Court · Mar 1, 2004

Dissenting Opinion by BROWN, J. … In National Labor Relations Board v.

Moore v. State Bar

62 Cal. 2d 74 · California Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1964

(Schullman v. State Bar (1963) 59 Cal.2d 590, 599-600 [3, 4] [ 30 Cal.Rptr. 834 , 381 P.2d 658 ].) … Code, §§ 6106, 6067; see Call v. State Bar (1955) 45 Cal.2d 104, 109 [2-3], 111 [6] [ 287 P.2d 761 ]; Rock v. State Bar (1962) 57 Cal.2d 639, 643-644 [3] [ 21 Cal.Rptr. 572 , 371 P.2d 308 , 96 A.L.R.2d 818 ].)