Case law

People v. Santa Fe Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n

28 Cal. 2d 675 · California Supreme Court · Aug 9, 1946

Skinner, 18 Cal.2d 349 [ 115 P.2d 488 , 149 A.L.R. 299 ], and cases therein cited; State Tax Commissioner v. Board of Supervisors, 43 Ariz. 156 [ 29 P.2d 733, 739 ]; Powell v. … V. Co. v.

Warner v. Santa Catalina Island Co.

44 Cal. 2d 310 · California Supreme Court · Apr 19, 1955

Eeldey, Thomas Browne. *312 Gene Nordlund and Edward Nagle. … The issue of proximate cause is essentially one of fact (Fennessey v. Pacific Gas & Elec. Co., 20 Cal.2d 141 [ 124 P.2d 51 ]; Mosley v. Arden Farms Co., supra, 26 Cal.2d 213, 219 ; Crowe v.

San Francisco & Fresno Land Co. v. Hartung

138 Cal. 223 · California Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1902

(LeRoy v. Cunningham, 44 Cal. 599 ; Dupond v. Barstow, 45 Cal. 446 ; McCreery v. Sawyer, 62 Cal. 257.) … (Campe v. Lassen, 67 Cal. 139 ; Weller v. Dickinson, 93 Cal. 110 ; Clark v. Nordholt, 121 Cal. 26 .) The ease of Judah v.

Woods v. Varnum

83 Cal. 46 · California Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1890

On October 5th, following, the board of supervisors appointed Henry Weineke to fill the vacancy caused by the removal of defendant, and on October 7th the court below made an order directing the sheriff to put Weineke in … In the case of Covarrubias v.

Musick Consolidated Oil Co. v. Chandler

158 Cal. 7 · California Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1910

Brown, and on December 26, 1899, Brown conveyed the same to Jacob Stone. This interest still remains in the heirs of Stone and no controversy has arisen over it. … E. 764 ]; Daingerfield v. Caldwell, 151 Fed. 558 , [ 81 C. C. A. 400 ]; Smelting Co. v. Rucher, 28 Fed. 223; Conant v. Smith, 1 Aiken, (Vt.) 67, [ 15 Am. Dec. 669 ]; Lenfers v. Henke, 73 Ill. 410 , [ 24 Am.

Nicholl v. City of San Francisco

201 Cal. 470 · California Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1927

This argument is persuasive, but not conclusive, and the case of O’Connell v. Retirement Board of the City of Boston et al., 254 Mass. 404 [ 150 N. E. 2 ], to the contrary, likewise is not conclusive. … In Anderson v. Lewis, 29 Cal.

Boyce v. San Diego High School District

215 Cal. 293 · California Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1932

This is an action for damages for personal injuries, brought by plaintiff and respondent against defendant San Diego High School District and the members of its board of education. … (See Dobbie v. Pacific Gas *295 & Elec. Co., 95 Cal. App. 781 [ 273 Pac. 830 ]; Bush v. Weed Lumber Co., 63 Cal. App. 426 [ 218 Pac. 618 ]; Madigan v. O. A. Hale & Co., 90 Cal. App. 151 [ 265 Pac. 574 ].)

People v. Avena

13 Cal. 4th 394 · California Supreme Court · Jun 10, 1996

(People v. Brown, supra, 46 Cal.3d at pp. 446-449; see People v. Wright, supra, 52 Cal.3d at p. 438 [applying the Brown “reasonable possibility” standard].) … Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512 [ 220 Cal.Rptr. 637 , 709 P.2d 440 ] (hereafter Brown) revd. on another issue, California v. Brown, supra, 479 U.S. 538 ; CALJIC No. 8.84.1 (4th ed. 1979); § 190.3.)

Hall v. State Bar

12 Cal. 2d 462 · California Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1938

(See People v. Zimmer, 23 Cal. App. (2d) 581 [ 73 Pac. (2d) 923 ].) … The board of governors adopted the findings with certain amendments, but recommended disbarment for both. Meanwhile the prosecution of Feinstein resulted in his conviction (see People v. Humphrey, 27 Cal.

Adams v. City of Modesto

53 Cal. 2d 833 · California Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1960

Tevis v. … (See Knight v. Board etc. Employees’ Retirement (1948), 32 Cal.2d 400, 402-405 [1-3] [ 196 P.2d 547 ].)

Taxpayers to Limit Campaign Spending v. Fair Political Practices Commission

51 Cal. 3d 744 · California Supreme Court · Nov 1, 1990

Proc., § 1859; Select Base Materials v. Board of Equal. (1959) 51 Cal.2d 640, 645 [ 335 P.2d 672 ]; Hogya v. … (See, e.g., Brosnahan v. Brown (1982) 32 Cal.3d 236, 252 [ 186 Cal.Rptr. 30 , 651 P.2d 274 ]; Fair Political Practices Com. v.

Los Carneros Community Associates v. Penfield & Smith Engineers, Inc.

79 Cal. Rptr. 2d 407 · California Supreme Court · Oct 21, 1998

Further action in this matter is deferred pending consideration and disposition of a related issue in Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope and Opportunity, S062156 (see Cal. … GEORGE, C.J., and MOSK, KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Seven Up Bottling Co. v. Grocery Drivers Union Local 848

40 Cal. 2d 368 · California Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1953

Alliance v. Wisconsin Emp. Relations Board, supra, 315 U.S. 437; Thomas v. Collins, supra, 323 U.S. 516 .) Following those expressions the subsequent decisions have dealt with various situations. Giboney v. … Board, supra, 341 U.S. 694, 705 .)

Weringer v. Rutledge

180 Cal. 566 · California Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1919

The law has been the subject of many decisions and will be found fully stated in Schwab v. Donovan, 165 Cal. 363 , [ 132 Pac. 447 ]; Price v. De Reyes, 161 Cal. 486 , [ 119 Pac. 893 ]; Loustalot v. … Brown, 168 Cal. 459 , [ 143 Pac. 754 ].

Rexstrew v. City of Huntington Park

20 Cal. 2d 630 · California Supreme Court · Jul 30, 1942

(Livingstone v. MacGillivray, 1 Cal. (2d) 546, 553 [ 36 P. (2d) 622 ]; Childress v. Peterson, 18 Cal. (2d) 636 [ 117 P. (2d) 336 ]; Winslow v. Bull, 97 Cal. App. 516, 523 [ 275 Pac. 974 ].) … (Wiles v. State Personnel Board, 19 Cal. (2d) 344 [ 121 P. (2d) 673 ]; State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court, ante, p. 467, 474 [ 127 P. (2d) 4 ].)

Bowen v. County of Los Angeles

39 Cal. 2d 714 · California Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1952

We held in Pockman v. … Fraser v. Regents of University of Califor *716 nia, post, p. 717 [ 249 P.2d 283 ]; Tolman v. Underhill, ante, p. 708 [ 249 P.2d 280 ].)

Endler v. Schutzbank

68 Cal. 2d 162 · California Supreme Court · Jan 26, 1968

Board of etc. Education (1956) 350 U.S. 551 [ 100 L.Ed. 692 , 76 S.Ct. 637 ] ; Wieman v. Undegraff (1952) 344 U.S. 183 [ 97 L.Ed. 216 , 73 S.Ct. 215 ] • BUmenthal v. … Board of Medical Examiners (1967) 66 Cal.2d 381 [ 58 Cal.Rptr. 7 , 426 P.2d 167 ]; Doyle v. Board of Barter Examiners (1963) 219 Cal.App.2d 504 [33 Cal.Rptr. 349] ; Presto v. Alcoholic Beverage Control etc.

Williams, Belser & Co. v. Rowell

145 Cal. 259 · California Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1904

It appears from the complaint that the board of trustees of the town of Emeryville adopted a plan or system of sewers for the town, and that the plaintiffs entered into a written contract with the defendant and other lotowners … (Taylor v. Palmer, 31 Cal. 254 .)

Broadway-Hale Stores, Inc. v. Retail Clerks Union

55 Cal. 2d 754 · California Supreme Court · May 8, 1961

(See Grunwald-Marx, Inc. v. Los Angeles Joint Board (1959), 52 Cal.2d 568, 589 [29] [ 343 P.2d 23 ].) American Stores Co. v. Johnston (1959), 171 F.Supp. 275 ; United States Steel Corp. v. … Thus, Flores v.

People v. Central Pacific Railroad

83 Cal. 393 · California Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1890

Board of Education, 55 Cal. 489 . In Miller v. … (San Francisco v. S. V. W. W., 48 Cal. 493 .) The same doctrine has since been laid down and adhered to in Waterloo Turnpike Road Co. v. Cole, 51 Cal. 381 ; Spring V. W. W. v.