Case law

People ex rel. Budd v. Holden

28 Cal. 123 · California Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1865

Sub *130 stantially the same point was made in the case of The People v. Jones, 20 Cal. 50 , without success. … (Searcy v. Grow, 15 Cal. 119 .)

People v. Hernandez

82 Cal. Rptr. 2d 814 · California Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1999

The cause is transferred to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division Two, with directions to vacate its decision and to reconsider the cause in light of Idaho v. … GEORGE, C.J, KENNARD, CHIN and BROWN, JJ, concur.

California Educational Facilities Authority v. Priest

12 Cal. 3d 593 · California Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1974

(Board of Education v. Allen (1968) 392 U.S. 236, 247-248 [ 20 L.Ed.2d 1060, 1067-1068 , 88 S.Ct. 1923 ].) … (Gordon v. Board of Education (1947) supra, 78 Cal.App.2d 464, 472-473 .)

McBean v. City of Fresno

112 Cal. 159 · California Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1896

(State v. Medbery, 7 Ohio St. 526 ; Davenport v. Kleinschmidt, Mont. 502; Salem Water Co. v. Salem, 5 Or. 29 ; Atlantic City Water Works Co. v. Read, 50 N. J. L. 665.) … which shall extend for more than one year, or even beyond the term of office of the board which makes it.

Deleon v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District

33 Cal. 3d 456 · California Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1983

Steele v. … Smith v.

Foerst v. Kelso

131 Cal. 376 · California Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1901

(Alexander v. Central etc. Mill Co., 104 Cal. 532 .) … Such were the cases of Grandona v. Lovdal, 70 Cal. 161 , Jacob v. Lorenz, 98 Cal. 332 , and Mallory v. Thomas, 98 Cal. 644 , with which cases this is identical in principle.

Chaffin v. Doub

14 Cal. 384 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1859

The plaintiffs, at the time of the mortgage, boarded with Buckelew, who lived on the farm; but, after the mortgage, they ceased to board with him. … This case is wholly different, in fact and principle, from Richards v. Schroeder, ( 10 Cal. 434 .) In that case, no change of possession of the brick was contemplated. The case is more like the case of Pacheco v.

City Carpet Beating Etc. Works v. Jones

102 Cal. 506 · California Supreme Court · May 26, 1894

As was said by this court in Brown v. … The case of Brown v.

People v. Clark

5 Cal. 4th 950 · California Supreme Court · Aug 30, 1993

Brown, as an officer of the court, was in the best position to assess whether a conflict of interest existed or was likely to arise. (E.g., People v. … Allen also represented to the court that Brown’s conflict would not affect his cross-examination of the witness. Allen was in the best position to make this determination. (People v.

Hickox v. Lowe

10 Cal. 197 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1858

In Kelleran v. Brown, ( 4 Mass., 443 ,) the plaintiff read in evidence an absolute conveyance. … (Brown v. Dewey, 1 Sand. Ch., 69 , and cases there cited; opinion of Kennedy, J., in Kerr v. Gilmore, 6 Watts, 405 .)

City of Anaheim v. PACIFIC BELL CO.

4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 69 · California Supreme Court · Aug 20, 2003

Orloff v. Pacific Bell (S099131) (See Cal. Rules of Court, rule 28.2(c)), or pending further order of the court. … GEORGE, C.J., and KENNARD, CHIN, BROWN and MORENO, JJ., concur. BAXTER, J., was absent and did not participate.

Griffith v. Lewin

129 Cal. 596 · California Supreme Court · Sep 4, 1900

(Griffith v. Lewin, 125 Cal. 618 .) … (Hall v. Superior Court, 69 Cal. 79 ; Davis v. Browning, 91 Cal. 604 ; Warren v. McGill, 103 Cal. 155; Landis v. Woodman, 126 Cal. 455 .)

Sav-On Drugs, Inc. v. Superior Court

15 Cal. 3d 1 · California Supreme Court · Aug 8, 1975

(Burke v. Superior Court, 71 Cal.2d 276, 284-285 [ 78 Cal.Rptr. 481 , 455 P.2d 409 ]; Southern Pac. Co. v. … Since the policy upon which Webb v.

French v. County of Santa Clara

69 Cal. 519 · California Supreme Court · May 17, 1886

In 1882, French was again voted for, and elected a justice of the peace for said township,—the board of supervisors of the county having meanwhile provided, pursuant to statute, for the election of but one justice for that … Showers v. Taylor, 57 Cal. 621 .)

Lentz v. McMahon

49 Cal. 3d 393 · California Supreme Court · Aug 17, 1989

Commission on Judicial Competence (1983) 146 Cal.App.3d 964, 980 [ 194 Cal.Rptr. 672 ] [failure to assert estoppel before board precludes raising the defense in court]; Mount Vernon Memorial Park v. … See Herndon v. Colorado Board of Social Services (Colo.Ct.App. 1974) 528 P.2d 395 , 398; Matter of Bryson v. Blum (1983) 97 A.D.2d 514 [ 467 N.Y.S.2d 884, 885 ]; but see West v.

People v. Castro

38 Cal. 3d 301 · California Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1985

Board of Chiropractic, etc. (1937) 20 Cal. App.2d 76 [ 66 P.2d 705 ]; Morrison v. State Board of Education, supra, 1 Cal.3d 214 (revocation of teacher's certificates); Board of Trustees v. Judge (1975) 50 Cal. … Board of Medical Examiners (1962) 204 Cal. App.2d 378 [ 22 Cal. Rptr. 419 ]; Hollingsworth v. Board of Medical Examiners (1961) 188 Cal. App.2d 172 [ 10 Cal. Rptr. 343 ]; Hallinan v.

City of Pasadena v. Chamberlain

192 Cal. 275 · California Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1923

Board of Supervisors, 109 Cal. 152 [ 41 Pac. 864 ]; Morgan v. City of Los Angeles, 182 Cal. 301 [ 187 Pac. 1050 ]). In the case of Law. v. … We must, however, look at the substance rather than the form, and the situation presented here is no different in substance from those considered in Law v. San Francisco, supra, and City of Long Beach v.

People v. Rodriguez

42 Cal. 3d 730 · California Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1986

Hence, there was no prejudice of the kind identified in Brown. In People v. … The United States Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Brown to consider the propriety of a penalty-phase “no-sympathy” instruction. (California v.

Abbey Land & Improvement Co. v. County of San Mateo

167 Cal. 434 · California Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1914

The plaintiffs’ action is a suit in equity to enjoin the enforcement of an ordinance passed by the board of supervisors of San Mateo County. The members of the board are joined as defendants. … Rep. 315 ]; Barnes v. Hathorn, 54 Me. 124 ; New Orleans v. Wardens, 11 La. Ann. 244 ; Clark v. Lawrence, 6 Jones Eq. (N. C.) 86, [ 78 Am. Dec. 241 ]; Lakeview v. Rose Hill Cem. Assoc., 70 Ill. 191 , [ 22 Am.

Washington v. Washington

47 Cal. 2d 249 · California Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1956

As I have heretofore pointed out in my dissents (Zaragosa v. Craven, supra; Flores v. Brown, 39 Cal.2d 622, 633 [ 248 P.2d 922 ]; and Kesler v. … (Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 1 [ 147 P. 1168 ].) Such a cause of action was held to be community property in Zaragosa v.