Case law

Lockhart v. Wolden

17 Cal. 2d 628 · California Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1941

(General Pipe Line Company of California v. State Board of Equalization, 5 Cal. (2d) 253, 256 [ 54 Pac. (2d) 18 ].) … (Dufton v. Daniels, 190 Cal. 577, 581 [ 213 Pac. 949 ]; San Diego etc. Ry. Co. v. State Board, 165 Cal. 560, 564 [ 132 Pac. 1044 ]; Scott v. Boyle, 164 Cal. 321, 323 [ 128 Pac. 941 ]; Grand Lodge, etc., v.

Diggins v. Hartshorne

108 Cal. 154 · California Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1895

It was held in Whiting v. … In Warren v.

In Re Jones

5 Cal. 3d 390 · California Supreme Court · Aug 5, 1971

(Feinstein v. State Bar, supra, 39 Cal.2d p. 547.) … The board struck this finding and made a general finding that “The record reflects no mitigating circumstances.” 6 Bordner v.

Caruthers v. Hensley

90 Cal. 559 · California Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1891

In Brown v. Johnson, 45 Cal. 76 , judgment was ren *561 dered in favor of the plaintiff for the value of the property, and damages for the wrongful taking, but without any judgment for its return. … In Claudius v.

Levy v. Scott

115 Cal. 39 · California Supreme Court · Nov 21, 1896

The cases of Godchaux v. Mulford, 26 Cal. 316 , 85 Am. Dec. 178 , Ford v. Chambers, 28 Cal. 13 , and Porter v. Bucher, 98 Cal. 454 , are to the same effect. … Code, sec. 3336; Cassin v. Marshall, 18 Cal. 689 ; Angell v. Hopkins, 79 Cal. 181 .)

In re Hayes

70 Cal. 2d 604 · California Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1969

(People v. Brown (1958) 49 Cal.2d 577, 591 [ 320 P.2d 5 ].) … Brown, supra, 49 Cal.2d 577, 590 (defendant cannot be sentenced both for criminal abortion and for murder caused by the same act), and People v.

Bates v. Gregory

89 Cal. 387 · California Supreme Court · Jun 1, 1891

In Von Hoffman v. … (See also Amy v. Selma, 77 Ala. 103 ; Milner's Adm’r v. Pensacola, 2 Woods, 632; Hill v. City of Kahoka, 35 Fed. Rep. 32; Amy v. Watertown, 130 U. S. 320 .)

Woodcock v. Dick

36 Cal. 2d 146 · California Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1950

(Fidler v. Board of Trustees, 112 Cal.App. 296, 302-303 [ 296 P. 912 ]; McKann v. Town of Irvington, 133 N.J.L. 63 [ 42 A.2d 391 ]; Buckbee v. … Board of Education, 115 App.Div. 366 [ 100 N.Y.S. 943, 949 ], affd. 187 N.Y. 544 [ 80 N.E. 1106 ]; Abrams v. La Guardia, 174 Misc. 421 [ 21 N.Y.S.2d 891 ].)

People v. Bank of San Luis Obispo

152 Cal. 261 · California Supreme Court · Nov 8, 1907

A proceeding was brought against the board of supervisors of San Francisco under the act, entitled Fitch v. … Packard v.

People ex rel. Stratton v. Oulton

28 Cal. 44 · California Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1865

In Spencer v. … Reference is made, on behalf of respondent, to Miller v. The Board of Supervisors of Sacramento County, 25 Cal., and People *58 ex rel. Dorsey v. Smyth, 28 Cal.21.

Moore v. Wilkinson

13 Cal. 478 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1859

The grant bears date on the twelfth of Juno, 1846; the claim under it was presented for confirmation to the Board of United States Land Commissioners in March, 1852, and was confirmed by that Board to the claimants in July … See Waterman et al. v. Smith, (ante) ; Yount v. Howell, (14 Cal.)

Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.

189 Cal. 335 · California Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1922

(Kessler v. Washburne, 157 Ill. App. 532 ; Zarzana v. Neve Drug Co., 180 Cal. 32 [15 A. L. R. 401, 179 Pac. 203 ].) … (Mann v. Scott, supra.)

Kash Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

19 Cal. 3d 294 · California Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1977

by the Board of Public Works Commissioners. … (Callie v. Board of Supervisors (1969) 1 Cal.App.3d 13, 18 [ 81 Cal.Rptr. 440 ]; see, e.g., Complete Serv. Bur. v. San Diego Med. Soc. (1954) 43 Cal.2d 201, 207 [ 272 P.2d 497 ]; Cal-Dak Co. v.

In Re Caudillo

26 Cal. 3d 623 · California Supreme Court · Mar 24, 1980

Caudillo is not entitled to any relief under Morrissey v. Brewer (1972) 408 U.S. 471 . … Pursuant to a statutory revision effective January 1, 1980, the Community Release Board has been renamed the Board of Prison Terms. (Stats. 1979, ch. 255, § 1 et seq.)

People v. Frazer

88 Cal. Rptr. 2d 312 · California Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1999

Warden v. State Bar (1999) 21 Cal.4th 628, 660 [ 88 Cal.Rptr.2d 283 , 982 P.2d 154 ] (dis. opn. of Brown, J.) [state equal protection provisions should be interpreted independently of federal guaranty].) … (See Cowan, supra, 14 Cal.4th at pp. 383-393 (conc. and dis. opn. of Brown, J.).)

Himes v. Somatics, LLC

California Supreme Court · Jun 20, 2024

(T.H., supra, 4 Cal.5th at p. 164; Brown v. Superior Court (1988) 44 Cal.3d 1049, 1062, fn. 9 (Brown).) … (Brown, supra, 44 Cal.3d at p. 1061.)

Medoff v. State Bar

71 Cal. 2d 535 · California Supreme Court · Jun 30, 1969

(Zitny v. State Bar, 64 Cal.2d 787, 790 [4, 5] [ 51 Cal.Rptr. 825 , 415 P.2d 521 ].) … Petitioner cites Werner v.

People v. Superior Court of Orange Cnty.

241 Cal. Rptr. 3d 1 · California Supreme Court · Dec 13, 2018

Brown, Assistant Public Defenders, for Real Party in Interest. … Brown Assistant Public Defender 14 Civic Center Plaza Santa Ana, CA 92701-4029 (714) 834-2144

Berson v. Nunan

63 Cal. 550 · California Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1883

(Heyland v. Badger, 35 Cal. 404 ; Hackett v. Manlove, 14 Cal. 85 .) … Code; Moore v. Murdock, 26 Cal. 515 ; Swanston v. Sublette, 1 Cal. 124 .)

City of West Hollywood v. Beverly Towers, Inc.

52 Cal. 3d 1184 · California Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1991

Rent Control Board (1984) 35 Cal.3d 858 [ 201 Cal.Rptr. 593 , 679 P.2d 27 ] (hereafter Santa Monica Pines ); it found Griffin Development Co. v. … Board of Supervisors, supra, 22 Cal.3d at p. 655 ; § 66474.1; Great Western Sav. Loan Assn. v.