Case law

People v. Berve

51 Cal. 2d 286 · California Supreme Court · Dec 5, 1958

Brown, Attorney General, Elizabeth Miller and Albert Bianchi, Deputy Attorneys General, for Respondent. CARTER, J. … A confession made to two sheriffs one day after a beating by other persons was struck down in Brown v. Mississippi, supra, 297 U.S. 278 .

Schaffer v. Smith

169 Cal. 764 · California Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1915

In Fox v. … In Perine v.

Rozewski v. Simpson

9 Cal. 2d 515 · California Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1937

The doctrine was apparently repudiated in the case of Sutliff v. … Rep. 30 ]; Kall v. Carruthers, 59 Cal. App. 555 [ 211 Pac. 43 ]; Nola v. Orlando, 119 Cal. App. 518 [ 6 Pac. (2d) 984 ]; and in the late case of Green v. General Petroleum Co., 205 Cal. 328 [ 270 Pac. 952 , 60 A. L.

Storke v. Goux

129 Cal. 526 · California Supreme Court · Aug 16, 1900

He failed to qualify as such district attorney, and thereafter was ap *527 pointed to the office by the board of supervisors. … This question upon principle is not to be distinguished from that decided in Larew v.

Moore v. Wilkinson

13 Cal. 478 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1859

The grant bears date on the twelfth of Juno, 1846; the claim under it was presented for confirmation to the Board of United States Land Commissioners in March, 1852, and was confirmed by that Board to the claimants in July … See Waterman et al. v. Smith, (ante) ; Yount v. Howell, (14 Cal.)

People v. Turner

20 Cal. Rptr. 3d 182 · California Supreme Court · Nov 1, 2004

(People v. Brown (2004) 33 Cal.4th 382, 401 [ 15 Cal.Rptr.3d 624 , 93 P.3d 244 ] (Brown).) (3) No written findings are required. … (Brown, supra, 33 Cal.4th at p. 402 .) (11) The death penalty statute does not violate the equal protection clause and we decline to overrule People v.

Mandracio v. Bartenders Union, Local 41

41 Cal. 2d 81 · California Supreme Court · May 19, 1953

Dotson v. International Alliance etc., Employes, 34 Cal.2d 362 [ 210 P.2d 5 ] ; James v. Marinship Corp., 25 Cal.2d 721 [ 155 P.2d 329 , 160 A.L.R. 900 ].) … (Bagdasarian v. Gragnon, 31 Cal.2d 744, 752 [ 192 P.2d 935 ] .)

Frantz v. Harper

6 Cal. Unrep. 560 · California Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1900

The complaint alleged “that the said defendant is indebted to said estate in the sum of $568.75 for toll, rent of stable, and blacksmith-shop, and boarding men from July 1, 1898, to January 1, 1899, at the agreed price of … A party cannot claim error in the failure of the court to find upon an issue if the finding must have been against him: People v. Centre, 66 Cal. 564 , 5 Pac. 263 , 6 Pac. 481 ; Demartin v.

Ward v. Flood

48 Cal. 36 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1874

Flood as Principal thereof, appointed thereto byj and holding office as such under the said Board of Education. “ On or about the 1st day of July, A. … A question similar to this came before the Supreme Judicial Court of the State of Massachusetts in 1849 (Roberts v.

People v. Billa

6 Cal. Rptr. 3d 425 · California Supreme Court · Nov 24, 2003

J., Kennard, J., Baxter, J., Werdegar, J., Brown, J., and Moreno, J., concurred. 6 1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code. 2 Although the prosecution proceeded on a felony-murder theory with arson the underlying … As in Pulido , we need not reconcile or choose between these lines because the result here would be the same under either. 6 We note that Chief Justice George was outside California (attending a board meeting of the national

Shupe v. Rodolf

185 Cal. 371 · California Supreme Court · Mar 28, 1921

As was said in Karr v. … the westerly way, so that the direction of the sign-board was without authority, so to speak.

Mitchell v. Colgan

122 Cal. 296 · California Supreme Court · Oct 18, 1898

reference to the board of examiners. … Cochran v. Los Angeles Countly, 117 Cal. 534 , was an action to recover for the care and keeping of children committed from defendant county.

People v. Carrillo

70 Cal. 643 · California Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1886

(People v. Brown, 56 Cal. 405 ; People v. Kerrick, 52 Cal. 446 ; People y. Padillia, 42 Cal. 585 ; People v. Phipps, 39 Cal. 326 .) … (People v. Kersey, 53 Cal. 575 , and cases there cited.) Judgment and order reversed, and cause remanded for a new trial. Boss, J., and Myrick, J., concurred.

Roth v. Moeller

185 Cal. 415 · California Supreme Court · Mar 29, 1921

Code, sec. 2356; Flanagan v. Brown, 70 Cal. 254 , [ 11 Pac. 706 ]; Parke v. Frank, 75 Cal. 364 , [ 17 Pac. 427 ]; Blumenthal v. Goodall, 89 Cal. 251 , [ 26 Pac. 906 ]; 1 Cal. … Goodall, supra), and comes within the decision in Brown v. Pforr, 38 Cal. 550 .

Kuciemba v. Victory Woodworks, Inc.

California Supreme Court · Jul 6, 2023

(Brown v. USA Taekwondo (2021) 11 Cal.5th 204, 214 (Brown).) As we recently explained, the rule of Civil Code section 1714, though broad, “has limits.” (Brown, supra, 11 Cal.5th at p. 214.) … (Davidson v. City of Westminster (1982) 32 Cal.3d 197, 203.)” (Regents, at p. 619; see Brown, at p. 214.)

Aday v. Superior Court

55 Cal. 2d 789 · California Supreme Court · May 11, 1961

“Minutes of the board of directors.” 13. “Stockholder records.” 14. “Corporate records” of the corporate petitioners. 15. … Brown, 354 U.S. 436, 440 [ 77 S.Ct. 1325 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1469 ]; see Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568, 571-572 [ 62 S.Ct. 766 , 86 L.Ed. 1031 ]; Near v.

City of West Hollywood v. Beverly Towers, Inc.

52 Cal. 3d 1184 · California Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1991

Rent Control Board (1984) 35 Cal.3d 858 [ 201 Cal.Rptr. 593 , 679 P.2d 27 ] (hereafter Santa Monica Pines ); it found Griffin Development Co. v. … Board of Supervisors, supra, 22 Cal.3d at p. 655 ; § 66474.1; Great Western Sav. Loan Assn. v.

Farney v. Stockton Port District

12 Cal. 2d 653 · California Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1939

the board shall be during the pleasure of the board”. … This decision was referred to with approval in People v. Abbott, 16 Cal. 358 , and Spreckels v. Graham, 194 Cal. 516, 528 [ 228 Pac. 1040 ].

Marine Forests Society v. California Coastal Commission

132 Cal. Rptr. 2d 527 · California Supreme Court · Apr 9, 2003

132 Cal.Rptr.2d 527 (2003) 65 P.3d 1285 MARINE FORESTS SOCIETY et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION et al., Defendants and Appellants. No. S113466. Supreme Court of California. En Banc. … GEORGE, C.J, and KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN and MORENO, JJ, concur.

In re Brown

62 Cal. 2d 902 · California Supreme Court · Mar 5, 1965

In People v. Brown, ante, p. 901 [ 42 Cal.Rptr. 837 , 399 P.2d 373 ], filed this day/ it is concluded that petitioner is entitled to appeal. No other basis appears for issuance of the writ.