Case law

Wilson v. Castro

31 Cal. 420 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1866

In Whaley v. … In Scott v.

Furman v. State Bar

12 Cal. 2d 212 · California Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1938

In the case entitled Fish v. … Clark v.

McCormack v. McCormack

175 Cal. 292 · California Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1917

Water Co. v. Redlands, 121 Cal. 365 , [ 53 Pac. 843 ]; Estate of Brown, 143 Cal. 450 , [ 77 Pac. 160 ].) … Griffith, 153 Cal. 502 , [ 95 Pac. 873 , 96 Pac. 323 ]; Fox v. Mick, 20 Cal.

Knight v. City of Eureka

123 Cal. 192 · California Supreme Court · Dec 29, 1898

The correct principle is stated in Scollay v. … There are numerous cases where it has been held that the county boards of supervisors may authorize the employment of an attorney other than the district attorney under certain circumstances, as in Scollay v.

Eastlick v. City of Los Angeles

29 Cal. 2d 661 · California Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1947

(Kelso v. Board of Education, 42 Cal.App.2d 415, 418 [ 109 P.2d 29 ] ; see, also, Wilkes v. City and County of San Francisco, supra, 44 Cal.App.2d 393, 395-396 .) … The boards of the fence were spaced two inches or more apart.

Ex parte Keeney

84 Cal. 304 · California Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1890

Section 3007 provides for the appointment, by the board, of a health officer, and section 3008 makes him the executive officer of' the health department. … So much of section 3005 as prescribed the term of five years for the officers of the board appointed by the governor has been declared to be unconstitutional. (People v. Perry, 79 Cal. 105 .)

Valenta v. County of Los Angeles

61 Cal. 2d 669 · California Supreme Court · Aug 20, 1964

No. 9 v. Farmer (1894) 101 Cal. 178 [ 35 P. 569 , 23 L.R.A. 388 ], and Swift v. … Board of Supervisors (1911) 16 Cal.App. 72 [ 116 P. 317 ], the respective plaintiffs unsuccessfully sought injunctive relief against county boards in order to prevent proposed abandonments of county roads.

In Re Maas

219 Cal. 422 · California Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1933

Assn. v. … In People v. Velarde, 45 Cal. App. 520, 524 [ 188 Pac. 59 ], the following appears: “Thus there is vested in every county police power by direct grant under the Constitution.

Falk v. Reis

88 Cal. 514 · California Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1891

(Schmitt v. Dunn, 55 Cal. 651 .) … In Falk v.

Wright v. Perry Byrne

129 Cal. 614 · California Supreme Court · Sep 4, 1900

(Brown v. Olmsted, 50 Cal. 162 .) Said indebtedness was not owing from defendant Byme, and is not a good consideration in law for her promissory note. … (Comstock v. Breed, 12 Cal. 286 ; Leverone v. Hildreth, 80 Cal. 139 ; Chaffee v. Browne, 109 Cal. 211 .)

Murphy v. Bucke's Department Store

199 Cal. 194 · California Supreme Court · Aug 3, 1926

In behalf of his creditors the business was taken over by the San Francisco Board of Trade and was conducted for a brief period by a representative of that board. Mrs. I. M. Bueke, wife of John Bucke, J. J. … Beckman, 64 Cal. 117 [ 28 Pac. 110 ]; Cortelyou v. Imperial Land Co., 156 Cal. 373 [ 104 Pac. 695 ]; 6 Cal. Jur. 754, and cases cited).

In Re Sturm

11 Cal. 3d 258 · California Supreme Court · Apr 18, 1974

Conti v. Board of Civil Service Commissioners (1969) 1 Cal.3d 351 [ 82 Cal.Rptr. 337 , 461 P.2d 617 ].) … In Monks v. NJ.

People v. Royce

106 Cal. 173 · California Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1895

In Commonwealth v. … People v.

Lukens v. Nye

156 Cal. 498 · California Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1909

In People v. Board, 75 N. Y. 42 , the salary of the police surgeon was fixed by law at twenty-two hundred and fifty dollars. … In Board of Education v. Common Council, 128 Cal. 369 , [ 60 Pac. 976 ], a tax had been levied and had been paid by many of the taxpayers.

Gomez v. Superior Court

54 Cal. 4th 293 · California Supreme Court · Jun 18, 2012

(See, e.g., Dare v. Board of Medical Examiners (1943) 21 Cal.2d 790, 797.) … (Coleman v.

Hale v. Akers

69 Cal. 160 · California Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1886

(Teschmacher v. Thompson, 18 Cal. 27 .) … This was said in Henshaw v.

Hughes v. Ewing

93 Cal. 414 · California Supreme Court · Feb 18, 1892

(Bates v. Gregory, 89 Cal. 387 .) … The case of Richards v.

Abbott v. Hartley

143 Cal. 484 · California Supreme Court · Jun 8, 1904

(Minor v. Kidder, 43 Cal. 229 .) … McKune, 12 Cal. 352 ; Sprague v. Norway, 31 Cal. 173 ; Hayes v. Kirkwood, 136 Cal. 400 , and Kenworthy v. Mast, 141 Cal. 268 , in which cases it was held that the specific irregularities did not vitiate the election.

San Buenaventura Commercial Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Vassault

50 Cal. 534 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1875

By the Court: The general question to be determined concerns the validity of the election of Yassault and others as members of the board of trustees of the corporation plaintiff. … The opinion of the court, sent up in the record, refers to the case of Warren v. Mower (11 Vermont, 385), as an authority in support of its conclusion in this respect.

People v. Guzman

45 Cal. 3d 915 · California Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1988

Rptr. 849 , 729 P.2d 115 ], our concern in People v. Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512 [ 220 Cal. … In People v. Brown (1985) 40 Cal.3d 512 [ 220 Cal. Rptr. 637 , 709 P.2d 440 ] and People v. Allen (1986) 42 Cal.3d 1222 [ 232 Cal.