Case law

Arden v. State Bar

52 Cal. 2d 310 · California Supreme Court · Jun 19, 1959

The precise wording of the findings is not of vital importance because this court is not bound by the board’s *316 findings (Higgins v. … In Petty v.

Modern Barber Colleges, Inc. v. California Employment Stabilization Commission

31 Cal. 2d 720 · California Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1948

The petitioner relies strongly on Laisne v. State Board of Optometry, 19 Cal.2d 831 [ 123 P.2d 457 ]. … State Board of Equal., supra, 6 Cal.2d 562 ).

People v. Sehorn

116 Cal. 503 · California Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1897

It was admitted that at the time of the publication of that article the deceased was a member of the board of town trustees and was the chairman of that board. … The article is about the said board, and particularly about the “ chief” of the board; and we cannot say, as a matter of law, that the article could not be fairly construed as containing a threat against the deceased.

Harvey v. Fresno Traction Co.

175 Cal. 489 · California Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1917

(Ja cquette v. Capital Traction Co., 34 App. D. C. 41, [25 L. R A. (N. S.) 407].) … (Berry v. St. Louis Transit Co., 211 Mo. 88 , [ 109 S. W. 661 ]; Burger v. Omaha & C. B. St. R. R. Co., 139 Iowa, 645 , [ 130 Am. St. Rep. 343 , 117 N. W. 35 ].)

Schullman v. State Bar

59 Cal. 2d 590 · California Supreme Court · May 21, 1963

(Rock v. State Bar (1962) 57 Cal.2d 639, 642 [1,2] [ 21 Cal.Rptr. 572 , 371 P.2d 308 ]; Best v. State Bar (1962) 57 Cal.2d 633, 635 [1, 2] [ 21 Cal.Rptr. 589 , 371 P.2d 325 ] ; Black v. … (Magee v. State Bar (1962), supra, at p. 429 [3].)

Middlebrook v. Superior Court

21 Cal. 2d 579 · California Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1943

Lime Co. v. Superior Court, 143 Cal. 170 [ 76 P. 973 ] ; Goodrich v. Superior Court, 92 Cal.App. 695 [ 268 P. 669 ] ; James v. Police Court, 39 Cal.App. 362 [ 178 P. 867 ].) … (Borchard v. Board of Supervisors, 144 Cal. 10 [77 P. 708]; Stumpf v. Board of Supervisors, 131 Cal. 364 [ 63 P. 663 , 82 Am.St.Rep. 350 ] ; Goodrich v. Superior Court, supra; Donovan v.

Huggins v. Longs Drug Stores California, Inc.

6 Cal. 4th 124 · California Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1993

Dummit, Faber & Brown, Gregory P. Matzen, Donahue & Callaham and Stephen J. Mackey for Defendant and Respondent. Thelen, Marrin, Johnson & Bridges, Curtis A. Cole, Steven J. … Bernheim, Dicaro, Highman, D'Antony, Dillard, Fuller & Gregor, Kimberly Brown and Brian S. Letofsky as Amici Curiae on behalf of Defendant and Respondent. OPINION BAXTER, J.

Dowhal v. Smithkline Beecham Consumer Healthcare

12 Cal. Rptr. 3d 262 · California Supreme Court · Apr 15, 2004

He relies on the United States Supreme Court decisions in Food and Drug Admin, v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. (2000) 529 U.S. 120 [ 146 L.Ed.2d 121 , 120 S.Ct. 1291 ] (Brown & Williamson) and Thompson v. … (Brown & Williamson, supra, 529 U.S. at p. 142.)

Birch v. Phelan

127 Cal. 49 · California Supreme Court · Nov 24, 1899

(Hilton v. Curry, 124 Cal. 84 .) … (See County of Modoc v. Spencer, 103 Cal. 498, 500 .)

Ahearn v. Davis

184 Cal. 579 · California Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1920

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment of the superior court denying him a writ of mandate directing the board of fire commissioners, the Civil Service Commission, and the auditor of San Francisco to recognize … The only reason advanced why we should refuse to do so is certain language from the opinion of this court in Maxwell v.

People v. Lewis

14 Cal. Rptr. 3d 566 · California Supreme Court · Jun 24, 2004

(People v. Brown (1993) 6 Cal.4th 322, 336 [ 24 Cal.Rptr.2d 710 , 862 P.2d 710 ]; see People v. Sakarias (2000) 22 Cal.4th 596, 648 [ 94 Cal.Rptr.2d 17 , 995 P.2d 152 ]; People v. … (People v. Brown, supra, 6 Cal.4th at p. 337 ; see People v. Ramos (1997) 15 Cal.4th 1133, 1183-1184 [ 64 Cal.Rptr.2d 892 , 938 P.2d 950 ].)

Washington v. Washington

47 Cal. 2d 249 · California Supreme Court · Oct 30, 1956

(Brown v. Brown, 170 Cal. 1 [ 147 P. 1168 ].) Such a cause of action was held to be community property in Zaragosa v.

Hard v. County of Plumas

35 Cal. 2d 577 · California Supreme Court · Jun 29, 1950

(Hard v. County of Plumas, 210 P.2d 58 .) EDMONDS, J. … They directly negate any intention to give the county boards of supervisors the power to determine the qualifications of a civil engineer for any purpose, or to divest the State Board of Registration for Civil Engineers of

Ward v. Crowell

142 Cal. 587 · California Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1904

In Palmer v. … In People v.

Manduley v. SAN DIEGO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

106 Cal. Rptr. 2d 269 · California Supreme Court · Apr 25, 2001

106 Cal.Rptr.2d 269 (2001) 21 P.3d 1188 Morgan Victor MANDULEY et al., Petitioners, v. SAN DIEGO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, Respondent; People, Real Party in Interest and Companion Case. No. S095992. … GEORGE, C.J., MOSK, J., KENNARD, J., BAXTER, J, CHIN, J., BROWN, J, concur.

Howe v. Southrey

144 Cal. 767 · California Supreme Court · Sep 21, 1904

In this case it can go no farther than to compel the board to issue its requisition for the exact amount of the judgment. … (Barber v. Mulford, 117 Cal. 356 .) *770 We advise that the judgment be reversed, with directions to the court below to issue the writ in accordance with the foregoing opinion. Harrison, C., and Cooper,-C., concurred.

Imlay v. Carpentier

14 Cal. 173 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1859

(See Alcott v. Avery, 1 Barb. Ch. 347 ; Johnson v. Fitzhugh, 3 Id. 360 ; Clark v. Rowling, 3 Com. 216.) And these cases are supported by numerous authorities in other States. (Ewing v. Peck, Ala. 339; Brown v. … In Brown v.

Dierkes v. City of Los Angeles

25 Cal. 2d 938 · California Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1945

(Gibson v. City of San Diego (1945), ante, p. 930 at p. 935 [ 156 P.2d 737, 740 ].) … Board of Supervisors (1941), 18 Cal.2d 193, 199 [ 114 P.2d 569 ]; People ex rel. Happell v.

City of Grass Valley v. Walkinshaw

34 Cal. 2d 595 · California Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1949

(Reuter v. Board of Supervisors, 220 Cal. 314, 323 [ 30 P.2d 417 ].) … (See Montgomery v. Board of Administration (1939), supra.)

Griset v. Fair Political Practices Commission

107 Cal. Rptr. 2d 149 · California Supreme Court · May 24, 2001

(See Leone v. Medical Board (2000) 22 Cal.4th 660, 666 [ 94 Cal.Rptr.2d 61 , 995 P.2d 191 ]; Powers v. City of Richmond (1995) 10 Cal.4th 85, 92-93 [ 40 Cal.Rptr.2d 839 , 893 P.2d 1160 ] (plur. opn. of Kennard, J.).) … (See California Teachers Assn. v. Board of Education (1980) 109 Cal.App.3d 738, 751 [ 167 Cal.Rptr. 429 ]; Elmore v. Imperial Irrigation Dist. (1984) 159 Cal.App.3d 185, 190-191 [ 205 Cal.Rptr. 433 ]; Bullock v.