Case law

California Pac. Title Trust Co. v. Boyle

209 Cal. 398 · California Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1930

In Smilie v. … They are Chester v. Carmichael, 187 Cal. 287 [ 201 Pac. 925, 928 ], San Francisco v. Boyle, 195 Cal. 426 [ 233 Pac. 965, 969 ], and Mahoney v.

C. J. Kubach Co. v. McGuire

199 Cal. 215 · California Supreme Court · Aug 9, 1926

(Marin Mutual Water Dist. v. Chenu, 188 Cal. 734 [ 207 Pac. 251 ]; Balthasar v. Pacific Elec. Ry. Co., 187 Cal. 302 [19 A. L. R. 452, 202 Pac. 37 ]; Mayrhofer v. Board of Education, 89 Cal. 110 [ 23 Am. St. … Rep. 451 , 26 Pac. 646 ]; Whittaker v. County of Tuolumne, 96 Cal. 100 [ 30 Pac. 1016 ].)

People v. Hendrix

192 Cal. 441 · California Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1923

. *448 In People v. … [Evidence], sec. 575; Lawson v. The State, 32 Ark. 220 ; State v. Lanier, 79 N. C. 622 ; People v.

People v. Russel

69 Cal. 2d 187 · California Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1968

Presiding Justice Brown in the opinion prepared by him for the Court of Appeal, Fourth Appellate District, Division One (People v. Russel, 4 Crim. 2841, filed December 13, 1967, certified for nonpublieation).

Allen v. Los Angeles County District Council of Carpenters

51 Cal. 2d 805 · California Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1959

Board of Public Works, 216 Cal. 546, 552 [ 15 P.2d 156 ] ; see also Merchant etc. Assn. v. Kellogg E. & D. Co., 28 Cal.2d 594, 599 [ 170 P.2d 923 ] ; People v. Murray, 135 Cal.App.2d 600, 603 [ 287 P.2d 775 ]; McVey v. … (Parker v. Bowron, 40 Cal. 2d 344 [ 254 P.2d 6 ]; Bartholomae Oil Corp. v. Superior Court, 18 Cal.2d 726 [ 117 P.2d 674 ] ; Rogers v. Board of Directors of Pasadena, 218 Cal. 221 [ 22 P.2d 509 ]; El Camino L. Corp. v.

Carpenteria School District v. Heath

56 Cal. 478 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1880

In Bryant v. … Corp. § 510; Klinkener v. School District, 11 Pa. St. 444.)

McCue v. State Bar

4 Cal. 2d 79 · California Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1935

Thereafter the case had the full consideration of the Board of Governors of The State Bar and petitioner appeared before them and made a statement. … (In re McCue, 77 Mont. 47 [ 248 Pac. 187 ]; In re McCue, 80 Mont. 537 [ 261 Pac. 341 ]; In re McCue, 211 Cal. 57 [ 293 Pac. 47 ]; Marsh v. State Bar, 2 Cal. (2d) 75 [ 39 Pac. (2d) 403 ].)

C.A. v. William S. Hart Union High School District

53 Cal. 4th 861 · California Supreme Court · Mar 8, 2012

(See id., § 44934 [dismissal proceedings may be initiated by a governing board formulating charges or by a person filing written and verified charges against the employee]; see, e.g., California Teachers Assn. v. … ]; Johnson v.

Hilton v. Oliver

204 Cal. 535 · California Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1928

On these boards the tules and weeds had apparently fastened themselves. … (Dobbins v. City of Arcadia, 44 Cal. App. 181 [ 186 Pac. 190 ]; Baisley v. Henry, 55 Cal. App. 760 [ 204 Pac. 399 ].)

Leeman v. Perris Irrigation District

140 Cal. 540 · California Supreme Court · Oct 9, 1903

It was held in Hughson v. … The board of directors has only such powers as are expressly given or implied as necessary to carry out the main purpose of the act. (Stimson v. Alessandro Irrigation Dist., 135 Cal. 389 .)

Spinks v. City of Los Angeles

220 Cal. 366 · California Supreme Court · Mar 26, 1934

Miller v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 477 [ 234 Pac. 381 , 38 A. L. R. 1479], and Jardine v. City of Pasadena, 199 Cal. 64 [ 248 Pac. 225 , 48 A. L. R. 509], are leading cases in this state on that subject. … (Reichelderfer v. Quinn, 287 U. S. 315 [53 Sup. Ct. 177, 77 L. Ed. 331 ]; Polack v. Trustees, etc., 48 Cal. 490 ; Seattle Land Imp. Co. v. City of Seattle, 37 Wash. 274 [ 79 Pac. 780 ].)

People v. Jurado

41 Cal. Rptr. 3d 319 · California Supreme Court · Apr 6, 2006

(See Brown v. Sanders (2006) 546 U.S. 212 [ 163 L.Ed.2d 723 , 126 S.Ct. 884 ]; People v. Combs, supra, 34 Cal.4th 821, 869 .) Since I expressed concern about the lying-in-wait special circumstance in People v. … Brown (2005) 546 U.S. 935 [ 163 L.Ed.2d 320 , 126 S.Ct. 420 ]; People v. Earp (1999) 20 Cal.4th 826, 904-905 [ 85 Cal.Rptr.2d 857 , 978 P.2d 15 ]; People v.

People v. Bank of Shasta County

172 Cal. 507 · California Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1916

(Williams v. Carver, 171 Cal. 658 , [ 154 Pac. 472 ].) Such contributions are not to be counted in ascertaining the value of the shares. … (Williams v. Carver, supra.)

Santa Barbara County Water Agency v. All Persons & Parties

47 Cal. 2d 699 · California Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1957

Brown, Attorney General, B. Abbott Goldberg and Adolphus Moskovitz, Deputy Attorneys General, J. Lee Rankin, Solicitor General of the United States, Perry W. Morton, Assistant Attorney General, David R. … App. 399 [ 105 P. 277 ], and Peterson v. Board of Supervisors, 65 Cal. App. 670 [ 225 P. 28 ] [reclamation districts]; Barber v.

People ex rel. San Francisco v. County Judge

40 Cal. 479 · California Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1871

(Wilson v. Sacramento, 3 Cal. 386 ; Lynde v. Noble, 20 John. 80 ; Noble v. Board of Pilots, 37 Barb. 126 ; Devlin v. Platt, 20 How. Pr. 167 ; Bac. Abridg. Title Certiorari.) Tbe action is improperly entitled. … (People v. Pacheco, 29 Cal. 210 .) Judgment affirmed.

Symington v. City of Albany

5 Cal. 3d 23 · California Supreme Court · May 27, 1971

Neither the city nor the Workmen’s Compensation Appeals Board could allow any credit if the contract of employment fails so to provide. (See City of Oakland v. Workmen’s Comp. App. … (Lyons v.

Stockton Savings & Loan Bank v. Mello

201 Cal. 194 · California Supreme Court · May 4, 1927

The. petitioner also relies upon Brown v. … v.

People v. Simmons

119 Cal. 1 · California Supreme Court · Nov 2, 1897

Two of the persons elected as members of said board were not such qualified electors. … (People v. Roberts, 6 Cal. 214 ; People v. Gatewood, 20 Cal. 146 ; People v. Hunter, supra.) We advise that the judgment and orders appealed from be affirmed. Chipman, C., and Britt, C., concurred.

Hooper v. Wells, Fargo & Co.

27 Cal. 11 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1864

(Aiery v. Merrill, 2 Curtis, 11.) And Mr. Chief Justice Gibson, in Atkoood v. … Justice Gardiner, referring to Alexander v.

Lufkin v. Lufkin

209 Cal. 710 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1930

Defendant relies upon McKay v. … In McKay v. McKay, supra, the care, custody and control of the minor children was awarded to the wife.