Case law

In Re Means

14 Cal. 2d 254 · California Supreme Court · Aug 24, 1939

Chenu, 188 Cal. 734 [ 207 Pac. 251 ] ; Balthazar v. Pacific Elec. Ry. Co., 187 Cal. 302 [ 202 Pac. 37 , 19 A. L. R. 452]; Mayrhofer v. Board of Education, 89 Cal. 110 [ 26 Pac. 646 , 23 Am. St. Rep. 451 ].) … (Young v. Superior Court, 216 Cal. 512 [ 15 Pac. (2d) 163 ]; Civic Center Assn. v. Railroad Com., 175 Cal. 441 [ 166 Pac. 351 ] ; Key System Transit Co. v. City of Oakland, 124 Cal. App. 733 [ 13 Pac. (2d) 979 ].)

County of Orange v. County of Los Angeles

114 Cal. 390 · California Supreme Court · Sep 28, 1896

(San Francisco v. Dunn, 69 Cal. 73 ; County of Tolo v. Dunn, 77 Cal. 133 .) … In Sedgwick County v.

Johnson v. Simonton

43 Cal. 242 · California Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1872

It is objected that the ordinance was one beyond the authority of the Board to enact. … (Jackson v. Shawl, 29 Cal. 267 .) Besides the ordinance here contains express words of prohibition, and the prohibited acts became thereby unlawful acts. 3.

People v. Crovedi

65 Cal. 2d 199 · California Supreme Court · Sep 14, 1966

Brown in the opinion prepared by him for the District Court of Appeal in People v. Crovedi (Cal.App.) 49 Cal.Rptr. 724 .

Fall v. Cty. of Sutter

21 Cal. 237 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1862

Ever since the great case of the Charles River Bridge Company v. … (See, also, Hartford v. East Hartford, 11 Pet. 534 ; Bank of Ohio v. Knapp, 16 How. 369 ; Bush v. Peru Bridge Co., 3 Ind. 21 ; Indian Cañon Road v.

People v. Clough

73 Cal. 348 · California Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1887

(Rex v. Atwood, 1 Lea Ch. 464; Rex v. Durham, 1 Lea Ch. 478, and other cases cited in Roscoe; Case of Brown et al., 2 Rog. C. R. 38; People v. Wheeler, 1 Wheel. C. C. 448; McDowell’s Case, 5 Rog. C. R. 94; People v. … Costello, 1 Denio, 83 ; State v. Brown, 3 Strob. 508 ; Stocking v. State, 7 Ind. 326 ; Dick v. State, 30 Miss. 593 ; State v. Stebbins, 29 Conn. 463 ; State v. Watson, 31 Mo. 361 ; Steinham v.

City of Barstow v. Mojave Water Agency

78 Cal. Rptr. 2d 184 · California Supreme Court · Aug 26, 1998

78 Cal.Rptr.2d 184 (1998) 961 P.2d 398 CITY OF BARSTOW et al., Respondents v. MOJAVE WATER AGENCY et al., Respondents, Jess Ranch Water Company, Appellant. No. S071728. Supreme Court of California. August 26, 1998. … GEORGE, C.J., and MOSK, KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Lady v. State Bar

28 Cal. 2d 497 · California Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1946

The deception indulged on July 25th was not found to constitute a contempt of court nor did it affect the outcome of the ease of Lady v. Sunderland. … (Pickering v. State Bar, 24 Cal.2d 141, 145 [ 148 P.2d 1 ] ; Utz v. State Bar, 21 Cal.2d 100, 105 [ 130 P.2d 377 ].)

Boggs v. Fowler & Hargrave

16 Cal. 559 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1860

(Darvin v. Halfield, 4 Sand. Sup. Ct. 468; Kohler v. Kohler, 2 Edw. Ch. 69 ; Post v. Leet, 8 Paige, 337 ; Seaman v. Hicks, 8 Id. 655; Brown v. Frost, 10 Id. 243; Shively’s Ad’mr v. Jones, 6 B. Monroe, 275.) … Strode, 1 Sim. & Stu. 381; Bequa v. Rea, 2 Paige, 339 ; Brown v. Frost, 10 Id. 243; Kohler v. Kohler, 2 Edw. Ch. 69 .)

C. J. Kubach Co. v. McGuire

199 Cal. 215 · California Supreme Court · Aug 9, 1926

(Marin Mutual Water Dist. v. Chenu, 188 Cal. 734 [ 207 Pac. 251 ]; Balthasar v. Pacific Elec. Ry. Co., 187 Cal. 302 [19 A. L. R. 452, 202 Pac. 37 ]; Mayrhofer v. Board of Education, 89 Cal. 110 [ 23 Am. St. … Rep. 451 , 26 Pac. 646 ]; Whittaker v. County of Tuolumne, 96 Cal. 100 [ 30 Pac. 1016 ].)

Hilton v. Oliver

204 Cal. 535 · California Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1928

On these boards the tules and weeds had apparently fastened themselves. … (Dobbins v. City of Arcadia, 44 Cal. App. 181 [ 186 Pac. 190 ]; Baisley v. Henry, 55 Cal. App. 760 [ 204 Pac. 399 ].)

Bixler's Appeal

59 Cal. 550 · California Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1881

(Parsons v. Tuolumne Water Co., 5 Cal. 43 . See, also, Saunders v. Haynes, 13 id. 145 ; Dorsey v. Barry, 24 id. 449; Jacks v. Day, 15 id. 91.) … Houghton , were subsequently modified in De Witt v. Duncan, 46 Cal. 345 , and Spencer Creek Water Company v. Vallejo, 48 id. 73. But De Witt v.

Biggins v. Champlin

59 Cal. 113 · California Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1881

(Columbet v. Pacheco, 48 Cal. 395 ; Sneed v. Osborn, 25 id. 626; Baldwin v. Brown, 16 N. Y. 359 ; Reed v. Farr, 35 id. 113.) Judgment and order affirmed. McKinstby, J., and McKee, J., concurred.

California Pac. Title Trust Co. v. Boyle

209 Cal. 398 · California Supreme Court · Apr 25, 1930

In Smilie v. … They are Chester v. Carmichael, 187 Cal. 287 [ 201 Pac. 925, 928 ], San Francisco v. Boyle, 195 Cal. 426 [ 233 Pac. 965, 969 ], and Mahoney v.

Allen v. Los Angeles County District Council of Carpenters

51 Cal. 2d 805 · California Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1959

Board of Public Works, 216 Cal. 546, 552 [ 15 P.2d 156 ] ; see also Merchant etc. Assn. v. Kellogg E. & D. Co., 28 Cal.2d 594, 599 [ 170 P.2d 923 ] ; People v. Murray, 135 Cal.App.2d 600, 603 [ 287 P.2d 775 ]; McVey v. … (Parker v. Bowron, 40 Cal. 2d 344 [ 254 P.2d 6 ]; Bartholomae Oil Corp. v. Superior Court, 18 Cal.2d 726 [ 117 P.2d 674 ] ; Rogers v. Board of Directors of Pasadena, 218 Cal. 221 [ 22 P.2d 509 ]; El Camino L. Corp. v.

Falltrick v. Sullivan

119 Cal. 613 · California Supreme Court · Jan 18, 1898

In support of his contention respondent cites Keller v. Chapman, 34 Cal. 640 ; Norwood v. Kenfield, 34 Cal. 332 ; English v. Dickey, 128 Ind. 174 ; McCrary on Elections, sec. 421. In Keller v. … This ballot was counted for Sullivan by the election board and also by the court.

People v. Bibby

91 Cal. 470 · California Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1891

In Commonwealth v. … In People v.

Olson v. Biola Cooperative Raisin Growers Assn.

33 Cal. 2d 664 · California Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1949

(Bogardus v. Santa Ana W. G. Ass’n., 41 Cal.App.2d 939 [ 108 P.2d 52 ]; San Joaquin V. P. Producers’ Ass’n. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev., 136 F.2d 382, 385 ; Texas Certified Cottonseed Breeders’ Ass'n v. … (Churchill v. Peters, 57 Cal.App. 2d 521 [ 134 P.2d 841 ]; Estate of Brown, 22 Cal.App.2d 480 [ 71 P.2d 345 ]; Overell v. Overell, 78 Cal.App. 251 [ 248 P. 310 ].)

C.A. v. William S. Hart Union High School District

53 Cal. 4th 861 · California Supreme Court · Mar 8, 2012

(See id., § 44934 [dismissal proceedings may be initiated by a governing board formulating charges or by a person filing written and verified charges against the employee]; see, e.g., California Teachers Assn. v. … ]; Johnson v.

People v. Wheeler

60 Cal. 581 · California Supreme Court · Jun 21, 1882

These views are reaffirmed in Washburn v. Cuddihy, 8 Gray, 431 , and in Commonwealth v. Brown, 121 Mass., 81 . So, also, it was held in Commonwealth v. … In Yoe v.