Case law

Resner v. State Bar

67 Cal. 2d 799 · California Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1967

The recommendation of the board is advisory, and the final determination rests with this court. The burden of establishing rehabilitation is upon the person seeking reinstatement. (Werner v. … Com. v.

Roy v. Pos

183 Cal. 359 · California Supreme Court · Jul 26, 1920

In the case of Moore v. … (Morrison v. Land, 169 Cal. 580, 590 , [ 147 Pac. 259 ]; Noyes v. Noyes, 224 Mass. 125 , [ 112 N. E. 850 ]; Dilger v. McQuade’s Estate, 158 Wis. 328 , [ 148 N. W. 1085 ]; Day v. Washburn, 76 N.

Sears v. Tuolumne County

132 Cal. 167 · California Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1901

Respondent relies upon the provisions of the section as they now are as conclusive of the rights of plaintiff; citing People v. Davidson, 79 Cal. 166 ; McMullin v. Leitch, 83 Cal. 239 ; and Blood v. Woods, 95 Cal. 78 . … The case cited in support of the text is State v. Lawrence etc.

People v. Cook

58 Cal. Rptr. 3d 340 · California Supreme Court · May 17, 2007

(See, e.g., People v. Brown (2003) 31 Cal.4th 518, 569-570 [ 3 Cal.Rptr.3d 145 , 73 P.3d 1137 ].) … (E.g., People v. Brown, supra, 33 Cal.4th at pp. 403-404; People v. Hillhouse (2002) 27 Cal.4th 469, 511 [ 117 Cal.Rptr.2d 45 , 40 P.3d 754 ]; People v. Jenkins, supra, 22 Cal.4th at p. 1055 .) L.

Patterson v. Hanley

136 Cal. 265 · California Supreme Court · Apr 12, 1902

In Farnham v. Boland, 134 Cal. 151 , this court made an even stricter application of the principle of Lauer v. Estes . … Our election law seems to have been copied as to the form of the ballot from the New York statute, and in May, 1898, before its adoption here, the case of People v. Board of Canvassers, 156 N.

Whitehead v. Davie

189 Cal. 715 · California Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1922

Supp. 123 ; People v. Abbott, 274 111. 380 [Ann. Cas. 1918D, 450, 113 N. E. 696 ]; State v. Love, 89 Neb. 149 [Ann. Cas. 1912C, 542, 34 L. R. A. (N. S.) 607, 131 N. W. 196 ].) … The decision of the district court of appeal, first district, division two, in Rumetsch v. Davie, 47 Cal.

California Physicians' Service v. Garrison

28 Cal. 2d 790 · California Supreme Court · Aug 27, 1946

(See, also, Brock v. Superior Court, 11 Cal.2d 682 [ 81 P.2d 931 ] ; City of Oakland v. Brock, 8 Cal.2d 639 [ 67 P.2d 344 ]; U’Ren v. State Board of Control, 31 Cal.App. 6 [ 159 P. 615 ]; Kingsbury v. … Co. v. Carpenter, supra; Painless Parker v. Board of Dental Exam., 216 Cal. 285, 296 [ 14 P.2d 67 ] ; 52 Harv.L. Rev. 811; 53 Yale L.J. 170 .)

Kirkwood v. Soto

87 Cal. 394 · California Supreme Court · Jan 4, 1891

For this amount he presented a claim to the board of supervisors, properly itemized and verified, for allowance. … The question now presented for decision does not appear to have been ever passed upon by the supreme court of this state, but a similar question was before the supreme court of Illinois in Briscoe v.

Wells v. State Bar

15 Cal. 3d 367 · California Supreme Court · Oct 3, 1975

(Yokozeki v. State Bar (1974) 11 Cal.3d 436, 443-444 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 602 , 521 P.2d 858 ]; Taylor v. State Bar (1974) 11 Cal.3d 424, 429 [ 113 Cal.Rptr. 478 , 521 P.2d 470 ].) … (Bernstein v. State Bar (1972) 6 Cal.3d 909, 919 [ 101 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 495 P.2d 1289 ].)

People v. Gallego

52 Cal. 3d 115 · California Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1990

(People v. Brown (1988) 46 Cal.3d 432, 446-448 [ 250 Cal.Rptr. 604 , 758 P2d 1135 ].) 6. … (See Brown, supra, 46 Cal.3d 432, 460.) 19.

Bankers Life Co. v. Canterbury

5 Cal. 2d 782 · California Supreme Court · Jan 28, 1936

This is contrary to our decision in Brown v. Ferdon, L. A. … For the reasons advanced in Brown v. Ferdon, supra, and upon the authority thereof, the judgment herein is reversed.

County of Los Angeles v. Superior Court

13 Cal. 3d 721 · California Supreme Court · Mar 12, 1975

and the executive officer-clerk of the board of supervisors. … (United States v.

McIntosh v. Funge

210 Cal. 592 · California Supreme Court · Oct 28, 1930

And in Humboldt Lumber Mill Co. v. Crisp, supra, and Watson v. … In *602 Johnson v. Smith, 97 Cal.

Davis v. Pacific Improvement Co.

137 Cal. 245 · California Supreme Court · Sep 10, 1902

In Klumpke v. … In Wells, Fargo & Co. v.

Libertarian Party v. Eu

28 Cal. 3d 535 · California Supreme Court · Dec 18, 1980

Brown, supra, 415 U.S. 724 ; Bullock v. Carter (1972) 405 U.S. 134 [ 31 L.Ed.2d 92 , 92 S.Ct. 849 ]; Williams v. Rhodes, supra, 393 U.S. 23 ) or deny the franchise itself (Dunn v. … (Storer v. Brown, supra, 415 U.S. 724, 733 [ 39 L.Ed.2d 714, 725 ].)

Stanislaus County Dairymen's Protective Ass'n v. County of Stanislaus

8 Cal. 2d 378 · California Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1937

Lim., p. 228; School District No. 7, etc., v. Hunnicutt, *390 (D. C. Okl.) 51 Fed. (2d) 528; People v. Kuder, 93 Cal. … It is said in the case of Martin v.

Crane v. Pacific Bank

106 Cal. 64 · California Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1895

in People v. … In People v.

City Street Improvement Co. v. Quigley

191 Cal. 149 · California Supreme Court · May 12, 1923

(Bienfield v. Van Ness, 176 Cal. 585 [ 169 Pac. 225 ] ; City Street Improvement Co. v. Pearson, 181 Cal. 640 [20 A. L. R. 1317, 185 Pac. 962 ]; Federal Const. Co. v. … Co. v. Newhouse, 186 Cal. 284 [ 199 Pac. 519 ].)

Citizens Against Forced Annexation v. Local Agency Formation Commission

32 Cal. 3d 816 · California Supreme Court · Dec 2, 1982

The City, ironically itself the product of litigation (see Curtis v. Board of Supervisors (1972) 7 Cal.3d 942 [ 104 Cal. … Board of Supervisors, supra, 7 Cal.3d 942, 951-952 .)

Wells v. Wood

114 Cal. 255 · California Supreme Court · Sep 16, 1896

If it was assessed for more than its lawful proportion, the defendant waived the error by failing to appeal to the board of supervisors, and the error cannot be corrected on this appeal. (Perine v. … Forbush, 97 Cal. 305 ; McDonald v. Conniff, 99 Cal. 386 ; Dowling v. Conniff, 103 Cal. 75 ; Warren v. Riddell, 106 Cal. 352 .) 3.