Case law

Bellman v. County of Contra Costa

54 Cal. 2d 363 · California Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1960

v. … Com. v. Payne (1947), 31 Cal.2d 210, 213-214 [1] [ 187 P.2d 702 ] ; Board of Soc. Welfare v. County of Los Angeles (1945), 27 Cal.2d 90, 97 [3] [ 162 P.2d 635 ].) We point out that Wilson v.

Brunton v. Superior Court

20 Cal. 2d 202 · California Supreme Court · Apr 21, 1942

(Mattos v. Superior Court, 30 Cal. App. (2d) 641 [ 86 P. (2d) 1056 ] ; Jones v. Superior Court, 88 Cal. App. 253 [ 262 Pac. 1098 ]. See Times Mirror Co. v. … (Ingels v. Riley, 5 Cal. (2d) 154 [ 53 P. (2d) 939 , 103 A. L. R. 1]; Aircraft Co. Inc. v. Johnson, 13 Cal. (2d) 545 [90 P. (2d) 572]; Kaiser Land & Fruit Co. v.

Spring Street Co. v. City of Los Angeles

170 Cal. 24 · California Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1915

(Reclamation District v. Birks, 159 Cal. 233, 241 , [ 113 Pac. 170 ].) … Trout, 146 Ca1. 350, [ 80 Pac. 81 ], and reaffirmed in Schaffer v. Smith, 169 Cal. 764 , [ 147 Pac. 976 ], and that the assessment here in question does not come within the principle of Lambert v.

People v. Hard

4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 103 · California Supreme Court · Aug 27, 2003

4 Cal.Rptr.3d 103 (2003) 75 P.3d 29 PEOPLE v. HARD. No. S117391. Supreme Court of California August 27, 2003. … GEORGE, C.J., and KENNARD, BAXTER, CHIN, BROWN and MORENO, JJ., concur. WERDEGAR, J., was absent and did not participate.

In Re Duggan

17 Cal. 3d 416 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1976

These are consolidated proceedings to review recommendations of the Disciplinary Board of the State Bar (Board) in L.A. … Rptr. 600 , 535 P.2d 728 ]; Yokozeki v. State Bar (1974) 11 Cal.3d 436, 450 [ 113 Cal.

Loder v. City of Glendale

14 Cal. 4th 846 · California Supreme Court · Jan 6, 1997

Baxter, J., and Brown, J., concurred. BROWN, J., Concurring and Dissenting. I join in Justice Chin’s concurring and dissenting opinion. … (United States v. Davis (9th Cir. 1973) 482 F.2d 893, 913 (maj. opn. by Browning, J.); see also United States v. Edwards (2d Cir. 1974) 498 F.2d 496 (maj. opn. by Friendly, J.); cf.

Bruns v. State Bar

18 Cal. 2d 667 · California Supreme Court · Oct 1, 1941

(Bruns v. State Bar, 213 Cal. 151 [ 1 Pac. (2d) 989 ].) Upon reviewing these records the board adopted the findings of the local committee, but recommended that petitioner be disbarred. … (Marsh v. State Bar, 210 Cal. 303 [ 291 Pac. 583 ]; Marsh v. State Bar, 2 Cal. (2d) 75 [ 39 Pac. (2d) 403 ]; Waterman v. State Bar, 8 Cal. (2d) 17 [ 63 Pac. (2d) 1133]; Trusty v. State Bar, supra.)

Finch v. State Bar

28 Cal. 3d 659 · California Supreme Court · Jan 8, 1981

(See Fitzpatrick v. State Bar (1977) 20 Cal.3d 73, 88 [ 141 Cal.Rptr. 169 , 569 P.2d 763 ].) In Inniss v. … (see Hamilton v.

People v. Flint, Irvine & Co.

39 Cal. 670 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1870

(See People v. Pico, 20 Cal. 596 ; People v. Mariposa Company, 31 Cal. 198 .) The complaint of the District Attorney, filed with the Board of Equalization, is insufficient, under the authority of People v. … Reynolds ( 28 Cal. 111 ), to give the Board jurisdiction to increase the assessment.

Thomasson v. Grace Methodist Episcopal Church

113 Cal. 558 · California Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1896

Codington, secretary board of trustees.” There was nothing in the charter or by-laws of the corporation giving any authority to the secretary to enter into contracts without the order of the board of trustees. … Code, sec. 1589; Borel v. Rollins, 30 Cal. 409 ; Gribble v. Columbus Brewing Co., 100 Cal. 67 , and cases there cited.)

Hobart Estate Co. v. Waters

220 Cal. 669 · California Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1934

Co. v. … Co. v.

Knowles v. Yeates

31 Cal. 82 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1866

In Conant v. … The provision of the Constitution which the Court in Conant v.

In Re Visciotti

14 Cal. 4th 325 · California Supreme Court · Dec 9, 1996

BROWN, J. I respectfully dissent. … (People v. Visciotti, supra, 2 Cal.4th at p. 74 .) Agajanian’s abysmal across-the-board performance rendered the penalty phase of the trial a complete and utter farce.

Fall v. Paine

23 Cal. 302 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1863

(Waugh v. Chauncey, 13 Cal. 11 ; Thomas v. Armstrong, 7 Id. 287.) … The judgments and orders of the board, in proper cases, where their action is not final and conclusive, can be reviewed by certiorari. (People v. El Dorado Co., 8 Cal. 58 ; People v. Marin Co., 10 Id. 344.)

Los Angeles City School District v. Griffin

3 Cal. 2d 651 · California Supreme Court · May 24, 1935

They seek writ of mandate to compel the secretary of the Los Angeles board of education, their governing board, to execute a contract between said board and the public school teachers’ retirement salary fund board (see. 5.940 … (Grigsby v. King, 202 Cal. 299 [ 260 Pac. 789 ].)

O'Melveney v. Griffith

178 Cal. 1 · California Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1918

That is to say, one of the boards created by the people seeks to take from another board, also created by the people through its charter, a power expressly vested by *5 the people in the latter board. … (Wheeler v. Herbert, 152 Cal. 224 , [ 92 Pac. 353 ].)

People v. Walker

47 Cal. 3d 605 · California Supreme Court · Dec 27, 1988

(Compare People v. Brown, supra, 40 Cal.3d at pp. 536-537, vacated sub nom. California v. … (People v. Brown, supra, 40 Cal.3d at p. 544, fn. 17 .)

Ex parte Chin Yan

60 Cal. 78 · California Supreme Court · Feb 4, 1882

The Traylor Act, declared unconstitutional in Earle v. The Board of Education ( 55 Cal. 489 ), was an act of the Legislature. Desmond v. Dunn, 55 Cal. 242 , and McDonald v. … (See Peoria v. Calhoun, 29 Ill. 317 ; St. Paul v. Colter, 12 Minn. 41 ; Brooklyn v. Breslin, 57 N. Y. 591 ; State v. Clark, 54 Mo. 17,36 .)

Mahoney v. City of San Diego

198 Cal. 388 · California Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1926

Co. v. County of Los Angeles, 162 Cal. 164 -168 [9 A. L. … Co. v.

Wheatley v. Superior Court

207 Cal. 722 · California Supreme Court · Jul 31, 1929

(Imperial Water Co. v. Board of Supervisors, 162 Cal. 14 [ 120 Pac. 780 ]; Miller & Lux v. Board of Supervisors, 189 Cal. 254 [ 208 Pac. 304 ]; Fallbrook Irr. Dist. v. Bradley, 164 U. S. 112 [ 41 L. Ed. 369 , 17 Sup. … In the case of Doyle v.