Case law

Moody v. Shuffleton

203 Cal. 100 · California Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1928

The case of Adams v. … The case of Foster v. City of Cape May, 60 N. J.

McGregor v. Bd. of Trs. of Burlingame

159 Cal. 441 · California Supreme Court · Mar 8, 1911

(Erdman v. Barrett, 89 Pa. St. 321; Nicholls v. Barrick, 27 Colo. 432 , [ 62 Pac. 202 ]; Bowker v. Eisenhood, 1 S. D. 577, [ 48 N. W. 136 , 12 L. R. A. 705]; People v. Robertson, 27 Mich. 116 ;. Shepard v. … In Carter v.

Hersh v. State Bar

7 Cal. 3d 241 · California Supreme Court · May 22, 1972

(People v. Righthouse (1937) 10 Cal.2d 86 [ 72 P.2d 867 ].) … (Krause v. Rarity (1930) 210 Cal. 644, 655 [ 293 P. 62 , 77 A.L.R. 1327 ]; DiGenova v. State Board of Education (1962) 57 Cal.2d 167, 172-173 [ 18 Cal.Rptr. 369 , 367 P.2d 865 ]; Aetna Cas. & Surety Co. v. Ind. Acc.

Mathys v. Turner

46 Cal. 2d 364 · California Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1956

(Schubert v. Reich, 36 Cal.2d 298, 299 [ 223 P.2d 242 ]; Giometti v. Etienne, 5 Cal.2d 411 , 413 et seq. [ 55 P.2d 216 ]; Preluzsky v. Pacific Co-op. … (See Gudelj v. Gudelj, 41 Cal.2d 202, 214 [ 259 P.2d 656 ]; Estate of Hubbell, 216 Cal. 574 [15 P.2d 503]; Browning v. Browning, 208 Cal. 518 [ 282 P. 503 ]; Coffman v.

People v. Marshall

114 Cal. Rptr. 2d 227 · California Supreme Court · Nov 28, 2001

114 Cal.Rptr.2d 227 (2001) 35 P.3d 416 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Phillip Cameron MARSHALL, Defendant and Appellant. No. S091666. Supreme Court of California. November 28, 2001. … GEORGE, C.J., KENNARD, J., BAXTER, J., WERDEGAR, J., BROWN, J., and MORENO, J., concur.

Dengler v. Michelssen

76 Cal. 125 · California Supreme Court · May 12, 1888

(Johnson v. Sherman, 15 Cal. 290 ; 76 Am. Dec. 481 ; Taylor on Landlord and Tenant, sec. 452.) … Moreover, the failure of plaintiffs to put defendants or their assignor in possession of the leased land justified the defendants in abandoning the premises (Skaggs v. Emerson, 50 Cal. 6 ; Camarillo v.

Oliver v. State Bar

12 Cal. 3d 318 · California Supreme Court · Aug 14, 1974

(Bradpiece v. State Bar (1974) 10 Cal.3d 742, 747 [ 111 Cal.Rptr. 905 , 518 P.2d 337 ]; Resner v. State Bar (1960) 53 Cal.2d 605, 612-613 [ 2 Cal. Rptr. 461 , 349 P.2d 67 ].) … (See Haley v. State Bar (1963) 60 Cal.2d 404 [ 33 Cal.Rptr. 609 , 385 P.2d 1 ] (one year actual suspension); see also Demain v.

Vermont Marble Co. v. Declez Granite Co.

135 Cal. 579 · California Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1902

(Sawyer v. Hoag, 17 Wall. 610 ; Upton v. Tribilcock, 91 U. S. 48 ; Scovill v. Thayer, 105 U. S. 143 ; Sanger v. Upton, 91 U. … In the subsequent ease of Camden v. Stuart, 144 U. S. 104 , Mr. Justice Brown, who wrote the opinion in Handly v. Stutz, 139 U. S. 417 , took occasion to explain the position of that court upon this subject.

Schultz v. State Bar

15 Cal. 3d 799 · California Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1975

Although in matters of discipline, as opposed to factual findings, the board’s recommendation is weighed more heavily than that of the local administrative committee (Toll v. … wrongdoing (Hallinan v.

County of Colusa v. County of Glenn

117 Cal. 434 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1897

The court also cited Mayrhofer v. Board of Education, 89 Cal. 110 ; 23 Am. St. Rep. 451 . … In Argenti v.

Livingston Rock & Gravel Co. v. County of Los Angeles

43 Cal. 2d 121 · California Supreme Court · Jun 25, 1954

(Zahn v. Board of Public Works, 195 Cal. 497, 512 [ 234 P. 388 ].) … Assn. v. Hillside etc. Park, 70 Cal.App.2d 609, 616 [ 161 P.2d 618 ]; Cantrell v. Board of Supervisors, supra, 87 Cal.App.2d 471, 475 .)

Grummet v. Fresno Glazed Cement Pipe Co.

181 Cal. 509 · California Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1919

(Freese v. Hibernia S. & L. … Co. v.

Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. County of Alameda

12 Cal. 3d 773 · California Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1974

(See Braniff Airways v. Nebraska Board (1954) supra, 347 U.S. at p. 593, fn. 4 [ 98 L.Ed. at p. 973 ].) … I, § 10, cl. 2; Brown v. Maryland (1827) 25 U.S. (12 Wheat.) 419 [ 6 L.Ed. 678 ].) This contention is likewise without merit.

Grove v. State Bar

66 Cal. 2d 680 · California Supreme Court · May 15, 1967

(Stephens v. State Bar (1942) 19 Cal.2d 580 [ 122 P.2d 549 ]; Herron v. State Bar (1944) 24 Cal.2d 53 [ 147 P.2d 543 ].) … (Richardson v. State Bar (1942) 19 Cal.2d 707 [ 122 P.2d 889 ].)

Tomlinson v. State Bar

13 Cal. 3d 567 · California Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1975

(See Himmel v. … (Resner v.

Panther v. Park

130 Cal. Rptr. 2d 656 · California Supreme Court · Jan 15, 2003

130 Cal.Rptr.2d 656 (2003) 63 P.3d 215 James PANTHER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. William K. PARK et al., Defendants and Respondents. and related actions No. S110025. Supreme Court of California, En Banc. … GEORGE, C.J., and KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, BROWN, and MORENO, JJ, concur.

People v. Wallace

101 Cal. 281 · California Supreme Court · Feb 7, 1894

On March 8th, the following entry was made in the minutes: “ The People of the State of California v. John Wallace. “ Defendant and his counsel are present and the district attorney is present. … This ruling seems to be warranted by the case of People v.

Granger v. Original Empire Mill & Mining Co.

59 Cal. 678 · California Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1881

This question was presented in Sargent v. Webster, 13 Metc. 497 . … (Sargent v. Webster, 13 Metc. 504 .) But it does appear in this case, from the record of the meeting, which differentiates it from Sargent v. Webster , that written notice had been served on each Director.

Heald v. Hendy

89 Cal. 632 · California Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1891

(Jones v. Clark, 42 Cal. 180 ; Stuart v. Adams, ante, p. 367.) … (Bank of California v. Northam, 51 Cal. 387 . See also Brady v. Wilcoxson, 44 Cal. 245 .)

United States Borax & Chemical Corp. v. Mitchell

27 Cal. 3d 84 · California Supreme Court · May 8, 1980

The early case of Southwest Land Co. v. … (See, e.g., Southwest Land Co. v.