Case law

Industrial Welfare Commission v. Superior Court

27 Cal. 3d 690 · California Supreme Court · Jul 10, 1980

In California Hotel & Motel Assn. v. … In Modern Plastics Corporation v.

Seal of Gold Mining Co. v. Slater

161 Cal. 621 · California Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1911

But it appears to be settled in this state that a notice of a special meeting of the board of directors need not specify the purpose of the meeting. (Granger v. Orig. Emp. M. & M. Co., 59 Cal. 678 ; Bell v. Standard Q. … A Soc. v. Tubbessing, 87 Iowa, 138 , [ 54 N. W. 68 ]; Perkins v. Morse, 78 Me. 17 , [ 57 Am. Rep. 780 , 2 Atl. 130 ] ; Sullivan v. Barry, 46 N. J. L. 1, 5; Edwards v. Perkins, 7 Or. 149 .)

Orosi Public Utility District v. McCuaig

196 Cal. 43 · California Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1925

{Miller & Lux v. Board of Supervisors, supra, p. 267.) … (Union Stone Co. v. Board of Freeholders of Hudson Co., 71 N. J. Eq. 657, 664 [ 65 Atl. 466, 469 ]. See, also, Wilson v. Board of Trustees, 133 111. 443, 464 [ 27 N. E. 203 ].)

People v. Burgos

California Supreme Court · Jun 3, 2024

Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314, 324 (Brown) [same]; People v. … Consider People v. Brown (2012) 54 Cal.4th 314 (Brown), which similarly 5  PEOPLE v.

In Re Holmes

187 Cal. 640 · California Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1921

The case of Eastman v. … In Gaylord v.

Anton v. San Antonio Community Hospital

19 Cal. 3d 802 · California Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1977

Turner v. Board of Trustees (1976) 16 Cal.3d 818 [ 129 Cal.Rptr. 443 , 548 P.2d 1115 ].) … State Board of Education (1955) 45 Cal.2d 255 [ 288 P.2d 862 ] (suspension of teaching credential on conviction of specified crimes); Patton v.

Lynn v. Duckel

46 Cal. 2d 845 · California Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1956

(Un ited States v. Superior Court, 19 Cal.2d 189 at 194 [1] [ 120 P.2d 26 ]; Abelleira v. District Court of Appeal, 17 Cal.2d 280 at 291 [5] [ 109 P.2d 942 , 132 A.L.R. 715 ]; Myers v. … Lindell Co. v. Board of Permit Appeals, 23 Cal.2d 303, at 314 [ 144 P.2d 4 ].)

People ex rel. Davidson v. Perry

79 Cal. 105 · California Supreme Court · May 1, 1889

Without reference, therefore, to the numerous “particular cases,” in which this court has assumed and exercised appellate jurisdiction, or the cases (such as Patache v. … Unlike the commissioners of the funded debt, who in People v.

Delano Farms Co. v. Cal. Table Grape Commission

233 Cal. Rptr. 3d 45 · California Supreme Court · May 24, 2018

(Board of Regents of Univ. of Wis. System v. … In Board of Education v.

People ex rel. Young v. Babcock

114 Cal. 559 · California Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1896

XXII, sec. 1; In re Stuart, 53 Cal. 746 ; Wood v. Board of Election Commrs., 58 Cal. 561 ; In re Guerrero, 69 Cal. 88 .) Consolidated city and county governments are subject to the control of general laws. … (Ex parte Keeney, 84 Cal. 304 ; Thomason v. Ashworth, 73 Cal. 73 .)

Martin v. State Bar

20 Cal. 3d 717 · California Supreme Court · Mar 13, 1978

Ordinarily, we attach great weight to the disciplinary recommendations of the board. (Silver v. State Bar (1974) 13 Cal.3d 134, 147 [ 117 Cal.Rptr. 821 , 528 P.2d 1157 ].) … (Ridley v. State Bar, supra, 6 Cal.3d 551 [disbarment]; Alkow v. State Bar (1971) 3 Cal.3d 924 [ 92 Cal.Rptr. 278 , 479 P.2d 638 ] [same]; Grove v. State Bar, supra, 66 Cal.2d 680 [same]; Rock v.

Weir v. State Bar

23 Cal. 3d 564 · California Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1979

(See Allen v. State Bar, supra, 20 Cal.3d 172, 178-179 ; Codiga v. State Bar (1978) 20 Cal.3d 788, 793 [ 144 Cal.Rptr. 404 , 575 P.2d 1186 ]; Sullins v. … State Bar (1976) 15 Cal.3d 893, 904 [ 126 Cal.Rptr. 785 , 544 P.2d 921 ]), although we attach great weight to the disciplinary recommendations of the board. (Inniss v.

Shuggart v. Lycoming Fire Insurance Co.

55 Cal. 408 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1880

In Security Insurance Co. v. … Co. v. Riker, 10 Mich. 279 .” In Viele v. Germania Ins.

Hayes v. County of Los Angeles

99 Cal. 74 · California Supreme Court · Jul 21, 1893

Y. 372 ; Corbin v. City of Davenport, 9 Iowa, 239 .) In S. C. V. Peat Fuel Co. v. … In Supervisors v. United States, 4 Wall. 436, a statute of Illinois provided that the board of supervisors “ may, if deemed advisable, levy a special tax,” etc. Mr.

Rosner v. Eden Township Hospital District

58 Cal. 2d 592 · California Supreme Court · Oct 24, 1962

The refusal of access to a district hospital could, as a practical matter, have the effect of denying to a licensed doctor qualified to practice in California the right to fully exercise his profession, (gee Wyatt v. … The determination of the board that Dr.

Sullivan v. Triunfo Gold & Silver Mining Co.

29 Cal. 585 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1866

People v. Johnson

8 Cal. Rptr. 3d 761 · California Supreme Court · Jan 29, 2004

In People v. … (Dix v. Superior Court (1991) *266 53 Cal.3d 442, 463 [ 279 Cal.Rptr. 834 , 807 P.2d 1063 ]; People v. Hill (1986) 185 Cal.App.3d 831, 834 [ 230 Cal.Rptr. 109 ] [recall of sentence under § 1170, subd.

Clark v. City of Manhattan Beach

175 Cal. 637 · California Supreme Court · Jul 17, 1917

This very point was raised in McCarthy v. … See, also, as declaring this same principle, People v. Prewitt, 124 Cal. 7 , [ 56 Pac. 619 ]; Davis v. Grunig, 143 Cal. 342 , [ 76 Pac. 1102 ].

Kern County Union High School District v. McDonald

180 Cal. 7 · California Supreme Court · Feb 25, 1919

Co. v. … Co. v.

Doughterty v. Austin

94 Cal. 601 · California Supreme Court · May 30, 1892

The supreme court of that state, in State v. Field, 17 Mo. 529 , 59 Am. … such board that the salary as thus fixed is insufficient to pay him a reasonable compensation for his services.