Case law

Norton v. Whitehead

84 Cal. 263 · California Supreme Court · Jun 2, 1890

(Frink v. Roe, 70 Cal. 309 ; Hunt v. Rousmanier, 8 Wheat. 175 .) … Counsel for appellants further contend, on the authority of Hunt v.

Hastings v. City of San Francisco

18 Cal. 49 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1861

The case of Hunsacker v. Borden ( 5 Cal. 288 ) is not in conflict with this view. … In the case of Burgoyne v.

Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior Court

9 Cal. 4th 559 · California Supreme Court · Feb 16, 1995

(Shaped Industries, Inc. v. Governing Board, supra, 1 Cal.App.4th 218, 232 .) … Gilroy City Council, supra, 222 Cal.App.3d 30, 40-41 ; McQueen v. Board of Directors (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 1136, 1144 [ 249 Cal.Rptr. 439 ]; Western Mun. Water Dist. v.

Thompson v. Williams

76 Cal. 153 · California Supreme Court · May 15, 1888

board on the 8th did not fix the hour at all. … (See Manufacturing Co. v. Vassault, 50 Cal. 534 .) The judgment must be affirmed. So ordered. McFarland, J., and Sharpstein, J., concurred.

In Re Powell

45 Cal. 3d 894 · California Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1988

It is indisputable, of course, that the board could not have based its rescission on the Gravitt allegation without giving Powell an opportunity to confront and cross-examine witnesses. (See Morrisey v. … (See People v. Powell, supra, 67 Cal.2d 32 ; People v. Powell, supra, 40 Cal.App.3d 107 .) We refer to Powell’s imprisonment following his arrest in this case.

Nolan v. Reese

32 Cal. 484 · California Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1867

Such are the methods pointed out by the Act for reviewing the decisions of the Board and the acts, of the Superintendent, and they exclude all others by positive provision. (Secs. 4 and 6 ; Gonlin v. … The testimony offered, to prove that the resolution of the Board ordering the work to be done was not signed by the Mayor was properly excluded. (Acts 1862, p. 392, Sec. 3 ; Taylor v. Palmer, 31 Cal. 240 .)

Lamberson v. Jefferds

118 Cal. 363 · California Supreme Court · Sep 25, 1897

It was said in Lassen County v. … And in McFarland v.

Directors of Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Abila

106 Cal. 365 · California Supreme Court · Mar 11, 1895

(People v. Seale, 52 Cal. 71 .) … This act of the clerk was unauthorized, and did not make the inserted words a part of the records of the board. In Dyer v.

Schwiesau v. Mahon

128 Cal. 114 · California Supreme Court · Mar 17, 1900

(Citing Bolton v. Gilleran, 105 Cal. 244 ; 45 Am. St. Rep. 33 ; San Jose Imp. Co. v. Auzerais, 106 Cal. 498 .) … The resolution is the initial step, and by it alone the board acquired jurisdiction to subsequently order the work done. (Bolton v. Gilleran, supra.)

People ex rel. Finigan v. Perkins

85 Cal. 509 · California Supreme Court · Sep 5, 1890

(People v. Taylor, 57 Cal. 620 ; Payne v. San Francisco, 3 Cal. 122 ; People v. Brite, 55 Cal. 79 ; Hull v. Superior Court, 63 Cal. 174 ; People v. Hartwell, 67 Cal. 11 . See also Ball v. … Kenfield , 55 Cal 320; People v. Whitman, 10 Cal. 38 ; Conger v. Gilmer, 32 Cal. 80 ; Marbury v.

Schwartz v. Wilson

75 Cal. 502 · California Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1888

In San Francisco v. … Were the ques *506 tion discussed in San Francisco v.

Agnew v. City of Los Angeles

51 Cal. 2d 1 · California Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1958

XI, §11; Tolman v. Underhill, 39 Cal.2d 708, 712 [4] [ 249 P.2d 280 ]; Pipoly v. Benson, 20 Cal.2d 366, 370 [ 125 P.2d 482 , 147 A.L.R. 515 ] ; Atlas Mixed Mortar Co. v. … In City & County of San Francisco v.

Bienfield v. Van Ness

176 Cal. 585 · California Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1917

(Mardis v. McCarthy, 162 Cal. 98 , [ 121 Pac. 389 ] ; Hayne v. San Francisco, 174 Cal. 185 , [ 162 Pac. 625 ].) … (San Francisco v. Certain Real Property, 50 Cal. 188 ; G illis v. Cleveland, 87 Cal. 219 , [ 25 Pac. 351 ].) 8.

Merrill v. Department of Motor Vehicles

71 Cal. 2d 907 · California Supreme Court · Sep 3, 1969

Jockey Club, Inc. v. Caliornia etc. Racing Board, supra, Cal.2d 167, 175; McDonough v. … (See Stewart v. State Personnel Board (1967) 250 Cal.App.2d 445, 447-448 [ 58 Cal.Rptr. 280 ]; Sweeney v. State Personnel Board (1966) 245 Cal.App.2d 246, 251 [ 53 Cal.Rptr. 766 ]; Forstner v.

People v. Thompson

115 Cal. 160 · California Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1896

(People v. Thompson, 111 Cal. 242 .) … This precise question has, I think, been decided by this court, after most mature consideration, in Sharon v. Sharon, 79 Cal. 633 .

Meyerfeld v. South San Joaquin Irrigation District

3 Cal. 2d 409 · California Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1935

(McDonald v. Hovey, 110 U. S. 619, 629 [4 Sup. Ct. 142, 28 L. Ed. 269 ]; Pacific G. & E. Co. v. Industrial. Acc. Com., 124 Cal. App. 303 [ 12 Pac. (2d) 649 ] ; McCarthy v. Board of Fire Commrs., 37 Cal. … Although the purchasers of said bonds were charged with notice of the limitations of the power of the board (McCoy v.

Felt v. Waughop

193 Cal. 498 · California Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1924

Brown, who has likewise complied with all of said requirements. … This conclusion finds some support in the case of State v. Marks, 30 La. Ann. 97 , cited and quoted from in the recent case of People v. La Barre, ante, p. 388 [ 224 Pac. 750 ].

Smithers v. Fitch

82 Cal. 153 · California Supreme Court · Dec 20, 1889

(Potter v. Ames, 43 Cal. 75 -80.) … (Quinn v. Anderson, 70 Cal. 456 .) “The question of highway or no highway was one of fact, to be passed upon as such by the court, and was properly determined as such.” (Tait v. Hall, 71 Cal. 152 ; citing Harding v.

Avila v. CITRUS COMMUNITY

7 Cal. Rptr. 3d 777 · California Supreme Court · Dec 10, 2003

7 Cal.Rptr.3d 777 (2003) 81 P.3d 222 AVILA v. CITRUS COMMUNITY. No. S119575. Supreme Court of California December 10, 2003. Petition for review granted. GEORGE, C.J., BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN, and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Boskowitz v. Thompson

144 Cal. 724 · California Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1904

(Thompson v. Allen County, 115 U. S. 550 ; People v. Biggins, 96 Ill. 481 ; Corbin v. Young, 24 Kan. 201 ; Grand Rapids etc. v. Trustees, 102 Ky. 556 ; Board of Commrs. v. King, 67 Fed. 202 .) 2. … (Hughson v. Crane, 115 Cal. 404 .)